Static and dynamic validation of inertial measurement units

Leah Taylor, Emily Miller, Kenton R Kaufman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Optical motion capture systems are used to assess human motion. While these systems provide a reliable analysis, they limit collection to a laboratory based setting. Devices such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have been developed as alternative tools. Commercially available IMUs are utilized for a variety of applications; however limited work has been done to determine the reliability of these devices. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of a commercially available IMU, containing tri-axial accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers, under controlled static and dynamic conditions. The sensor output was validated against the gold standard measures of custom made mechanical testing apparatuses. The IMUs provide an accurate (within 0.6°) and precise (within 0.1°) measurement of static sensor orientation and an accurate (within 4.4° per second) and precise (within 0.2° per second) representation of angular velocity. The sensors are more accurate at lower velocities, but the percent error remains relatively constant across all angular velocities. Inclusion of IMUs as an appropriate measurement tool should be based on the application, specific demands and necessary reliability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-84
Number of pages5
JournalGait and Posture
Volume57
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Angular velocity
  • Inertial measurement units
  • Orientation
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Static and dynamic validation of inertial measurement units. / Taylor, Leah; Miller, Emily; Kaufman, Kenton R.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 57, 01.09.2017, p. 80-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Taylor, Leah ; Miller, Emily ; Kaufman, Kenton R. / Static and dynamic validation of inertial measurement units. In: Gait and Posture. 2017 ; Vol. 57. pp. 80-84.
@article{758444c87f8c4f58ab606304c2fbfe8a,
title = "Static and dynamic validation of inertial measurement units",
abstract = "Optical motion capture systems are used to assess human motion. While these systems provide a reliable analysis, they limit collection to a laboratory based setting. Devices such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have been developed as alternative tools. Commercially available IMUs are utilized for a variety of applications; however limited work has been done to determine the reliability of these devices. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of a commercially available IMU, containing tri-axial accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers, under controlled static and dynamic conditions. The sensor output was validated against the gold standard measures of custom made mechanical testing apparatuses. The IMUs provide an accurate (within 0.6°) and precise (within 0.1°) measurement of static sensor orientation and an accurate (within 4.4° per second) and precise (within 0.2° per second) representation of angular velocity. The sensors are more accurate at lower velocities, but the percent error remains relatively constant across all angular velocities. Inclusion of IMUs as an appropriate measurement tool should be based on the application, specific demands and necessary reliability.",
keywords = "Angular velocity, Inertial measurement units, Orientation, Validation",
author = "Leah Taylor and Emily Miller and Kaufman, {Kenton R}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "80--84",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Static and dynamic validation of inertial measurement units

AU - Taylor, Leah

AU - Miller, Emily

AU - Kaufman, Kenton R

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Optical motion capture systems are used to assess human motion. While these systems provide a reliable analysis, they limit collection to a laboratory based setting. Devices such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have been developed as alternative tools. Commercially available IMUs are utilized for a variety of applications; however limited work has been done to determine the reliability of these devices. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of a commercially available IMU, containing tri-axial accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers, under controlled static and dynamic conditions. The sensor output was validated against the gold standard measures of custom made mechanical testing apparatuses. The IMUs provide an accurate (within 0.6°) and precise (within 0.1°) measurement of static sensor orientation and an accurate (within 4.4° per second) and precise (within 0.2° per second) representation of angular velocity. The sensors are more accurate at lower velocities, but the percent error remains relatively constant across all angular velocities. Inclusion of IMUs as an appropriate measurement tool should be based on the application, specific demands and necessary reliability.

AB - Optical motion capture systems are used to assess human motion. While these systems provide a reliable analysis, they limit collection to a laboratory based setting. Devices such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have been developed as alternative tools. Commercially available IMUs are utilized for a variety of applications; however limited work has been done to determine the reliability of these devices. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of a commercially available IMU, containing tri-axial accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers, under controlled static and dynamic conditions. The sensor output was validated against the gold standard measures of custom made mechanical testing apparatuses. The IMUs provide an accurate (within 0.6°) and precise (within 0.1°) measurement of static sensor orientation and an accurate (within 4.4° per second) and precise (within 0.2° per second) representation of angular velocity. The sensors are more accurate at lower velocities, but the percent error remains relatively constant across all angular velocities. Inclusion of IMUs as an appropriate measurement tool should be based on the application, specific demands and necessary reliability.

KW - Angular velocity

KW - Inertial measurement units

KW - Orientation

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020030850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020030850&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.026

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.05.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 28578138

AN - SCOPUS:85020030850

VL - 57

SP - 80

EP - 84

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

ER -