Standards for reporting qualitative research

A synthesis of recommendations

Bridget C. O'Brien, Ilene B. Harris, Thomas J. Beckman, Darcy A. Reed, David Allan Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

564 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods. METHOD: The authors identified guidelines, reporting standards, and critical appraisal criteria for qualitative research by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google through July 2013; reviewing the reference lists of retrieved sources; and contacting experts. Specifically, two authors reviewed a sample of sources to generate an initial set of items that were potentially important in reporting qualitative research. Through an iterative process of reviewing sources, modifying the set of items, and coding all sources for items, the authors prepared a near-final list of items and descriptions and sent this list to five external reviewers for feedback. The final items and descriptions included in the reporting standards reflect this feedback. RESULTS: The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) consists of 21 items. The authors define and explain key elements of each item and provide examples from recently published articles to illustrate ways in which the standards can be met. CONCLUSIONS: The SRQR aims to improve the transparency of all aspects of qualitative research by providing clear standards for reporting qualitative research. These standards will assist authors during manuscript preparation, editors and reviewers in evaluating a manuscript for potential publication, and readers when critically appraising, applying, and synthesizing study findings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1245-1251
Number of pages7
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume89
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Qualitative Research
qualitative research
Manuscripts
quantitative research
PubMed
search engine
transparency
Publications
coding
flexibility
editor
Guidelines
expert
paradigm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Standards for reporting qualitative research : A synthesis of recommendations. / O'Brien, Bridget C.; Harris, Ilene B.; Beckman, Thomas J.; Reed, Darcy A.; Cook, David Allan.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 89, No. 9, 2014, p. 1245-1251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Brien, Bridget C. ; Harris, Ilene B. ; Beckman, Thomas J. ; Reed, Darcy A. ; Cook, David Allan. / Standards for reporting qualitative research : A synthesis of recommendations. In: Academic Medicine. 2014 ; Vol. 89, No. 9. pp. 1245-1251.
@article{245bfa64968c4edc8a70ff0345888907,
title = "Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods. METHOD: The authors identified guidelines, reporting standards, and critical appraisal criteria for qualitative research by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google through July 2013; reviewing the reference lists of retrieved sources; and contacting experts. Specifically, two authors reviewed a sample of sources to generate an initial set of items that were potentially important in reporting qualitative research. Through an iterative process of reviewing sources, modifying the set of items, and coding all sources for items, the authors prepared a near-final list of items and descriptions and sent this list to five external reviewers for feedback. The final items and descriptions included in the reporting standards reflect this feedback. RESULTS: The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) consists of 21 items. The authors define and explain key elements of each item and provide examples from recently published articles to illustrate ways in which the standards can be met. CONCLUSIONS: The SRQR aims to improve the transparency of all aspects of qualitative research by providing clear standards for reporting qualitative research. These standards will assist authors during manuscript preparation, editors and reviewers in evaluating a manuscript for potential publication, and readers when critically appraising, applying, and synthesizing study findings.",
author = "O'Brien, {Bridget C.} and Harris, {Ilene B.} and Beckman, {Thomas J.} and Reed, {Darcy A.} and Cook, {David Allan}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "1245--1251",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standards for reporting qualitative research

T2 - A synthesis of recommendations

AU - O'Brien, Bridget C.

AU - Harris, Ilene B.

AU - Beckman, Thomas J.

AU - Reed, Darcy A.

AU - Cook, David Allan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - PURPOSE: Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods. METHOD: The authors identified guidelines, reporting standards, and critical appraisal criteria for qualitative research by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google through July 2013; reviewing the reference lists of retrieved sources; and contacting experts. Specifically, two authors reviewed a sample of sources to generate an initial set of items that were potentially important in reporting qualitative research. Through an iterative process of reviewing sources, modifying the set of items, and coding all sources for items, the authors prepared a near-final list of items and descriptions and sent this list to five external reviewers for feedback. The final items and descriptions included in the reporting standards reflect this feedback. RESULTS: The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) consists of 21 items. The authors define and explain key elements of each item and provide examples from recently published articles to illustrate ways in which the standards can be met. CONCLUSIONS: The SRQR aims to improve the transparency of all aspects of qualitative research by providing clear standards for reporting qualitative research. These standards will assist authors during manuscript preparation, editors and reviewers in evaluating a manuscript for potential publication, and readers when critically appraising, applying, and synthesizing study findings.

AB - PURPOSE: Standards for reporting exist for many types of quantitative research, but currently none exist for the broad spectrum of qualitative research. The purpose of the present study was to formulate and define standards for reporting qualitative research while preserving the requisite flexibility to accommodate various paradigms, approaches, and methods. METHOD: The authors identified guidelines, reporting standards, and critical appraisal criteria for qualitative research by searching PubMed, Web of Science, and Google through July 2013; reviewing the reference lists of retrieved sources; and contacting experts. Specifically, two authors reviewed a sample of sources to generate an initial set of items that were potentially important in reporting qualitative research. Through an iterative process of reviewing sources, modifying the set of items, and coding all sources for items, the authors prepared a near-final list of items and descriptions and sent this list to five external reviewers for feedback. The final items and descriptions included in the reporting standards reflect this feedback. RESULTS: The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) consists of 21 items. The authors define and explain key elements of each item and provide examples from recently published articles to illustrate ways in which the standards can be met. CONCLUSIONS: The SRQR aims to improve the transparency of all aspects of qualitative research by providing clear standards for reporting qualitative research. These standards will assist authors during manuscript preparation, editors and reviewers in evaluating a manuscript for potential publication, and readers when critically appraising, applying, and synthesizing study findings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908022244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908022244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 1245

EP - 1251

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 9

ER -