Stability of human binocular alignment in the dark and under conditions of nonfixation

Jaeho Jung, Lindsay Klaehn, Michael C. Brodsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the stability of human binocular alignment under conditions of altered fixation and luminance. Methods Horizontal binocular alignment in 8 healthy orthotropic subjects was measured using infrared video-oculography (VOG) under conditions of binocular fixation and luminance change. Each testing condition was preceded by a binocular fixation period in room light (475 lux) to define the baseline binocular alignment. Binocular alignment was then measured in darkness without fixation, in room light through a semitranslucent filter that precluded fixation, and in darkness with a distant fixational target. We used the signed rank test to determine statistically whether these experimental conditions induced significant binocular alignment change from each baseline binocular alignment. Results The mean horizontal binocular alignment in the dark without fixation was similar to baseline binocular alignment (0.2° ± 2.8° P = 0.4). The mean horizontal binocular alignment without fixation in room light was also similar to baseline binocular alignment (−1.4° ± 1.6° P = 0.08). The mean horizontal binocular alignment in the dark when a fixational target was provided showed an exodrift compared to baseline alignment (2.3° ± 1.0° P = 0.0004). Conclusions The human brain does not require visual input to maintain binocular alignment on a short-term basis. The resilience of binocular alignment probably reflects the presence of phoria adaptation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-357
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stability of human binocular alignment in the dark and under conditions of nonfixation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this