Sonographic evaluation of the iliotibial band at the lateral femoral epicondyle: Does the iliotibial band move?

Elena J. Jelsing, Jonathan T. Finnoff, Andrea L Cheville, Bruce A Levy, Jay Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives-The purpose of this study was to determine whether the iliotibial band (ITB) moves relative to the lateral femoral epicondyle (LFE) as a function of knee flexion in both non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing positions in asymptomatic recreational runners. Methods-Five male and 15 female asymptomatic recreational runners (10-30 miles/wk) aged 18 to 40 years were examined with sonography to assess the distance between the anterior fibers of the ITB and the LFE in full extension, 30° of knee flexion, and 45° of knee flexion. Measurements were obtained on both knees in the supine (non- weight-bearing) and standing (weight-bearing) positions. Results-The distance between the anterior fibers of the ITB and the LFE decreased significantly from full extension to 45° of knee flexion in both supine (0.38-cm average decrease; P< .001) and standing (0.71-cm average decrease; P< .001) positions. These changes reflect posterior translation of the ITB during the 0° to 45° flexion arc of motion in both the supine and standing positions. Conclusions-Sonographic evaluation of the ITB in our study population clearly revealed anteroposterior motion of the ITB relative to the LFE during knee flexionextension. Our results indicate that the ITB does in fact move relative to the femur during the functional ranges of knee motion. Future investigations examining ITB motion in symptomatic populations may provide further insight into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of ITB syndrome and facilitate the development of more effective treatment strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1199-1206
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Fingerprint

Thigh
Knee
Weight-Bearing
Iliotibial Band Syndrome
Supine Position
Articular Range of Motion
Posture
Femur
Population
Ultrasonography

Keywords

  • Iliotibial band
  • Iliotibial band syndrome
  • Sonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sonographic evaluation of the iliotibial band at the lateral femoral epicondyle : Does the iliotibial band move? / Jelsing, Elena J.; Finnoff, Jonathan T.; Cheville, Andrea L; Levy, Bruce A; Smith, Jay.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 32, No. 7, 01.07.2013, p. 1199-1206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1e77b7c6b0c42a784953282946d14c5,
title = "Sonographic evaluation of the iliotibial band at the lateral femoral epicondyle: Does the iliotibial band move?",
abstract = "Objectives-The purpose of this study was to determine whether the iliotibial band (ITB) moves relative to the lateral femoral epicondyle (LFE) as a function of knee flexion in both non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing positions in asymptomatic recreational runners. Methods-Five male and 15 female asymptomatic recreational runners (10-30 miles/wk) aged 18 to 40 years were examined with sonography to assess the distance between the anterior fibers of the ITB and the LFE in full extension, 30° of knee flexion, and 45° of knee flexion. Measurements were obtained on both knees in the supine (non- weight-bearing) and standing (weight-bearing) positions. Results-The distance between the anterior fibers of the ITB and the LFE decreased significantly from full extension to 45° of knee flexion in both supine (0.38-cm average decrease; P< .001) and standing (0.71-cm average decrease; P< .001) positions. These changes reflect posterior translation of the ITB during the 0° to 45° flexion arc of motion in both the supine and standing positions. Conclusions-Sonographic evaluation of the ITB in our study population clearly revealed anteroposterior motion of the ITB relative to the LFE during knee flexionextension. Our results indicate that the ITB does in fact move relative to the femur during the functional ranges of knee motion. Future investigations examining ITB motion in symptomatic populations may provide further insight into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of ITB syndrome and facilitate the development of more effective treatment strategies.",
keywords = "Iliotibial band, Iliotibial band syndrome, Sonography",
author = "Jelsing, {Elena J.} and Finnoff, {Jonathan T.} and Cheville, {Andrea L} and Levy, {Bruce A} and Jay Smith",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.7863/ultra.32.7.1199",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1199--1206",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sonographic evaluation of the iliotibial band at the lateral femoral epicondyle

T2 - Does the iliotibial band move?

AU - Jelsing, Elena J.

AU - Finnoff, Jonathan T.

AU - Cheville, Andrea L

AU - Levy, Bruce A

AU - Smith, Jay

PY - 2013/7/1

Y1 - 2013/7/1

N2 - Objectives-The purpose of this study was to determine whether the iliotibial band (ITB) moves relative to the lateral femoral epicondyle (LFE) as a function of knee flexion in both non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing positions in asymptomatic recreational runners. Methods-Five male and 15 female asymptomatic recreational runners (10-30 miles/wk) aged 18 to 40 years were examined with sonography to assess the distance between the anterior fibers of the ITB and the LFE in full extension, 30° of knee flexion, and 45° of knee flexion. Measurements were obtained on both knees in the supine (non- weight-bearing) and standing (weight-bearing) positions. Results-The distance between the anterior fibers of the ITB and the LFE decreased significantly from full extension to 45° of knee flexion in both supine (0.38-cm average decrease; P< .001) and standing (0.71-cm average decrease; P< .001) positions. These changes reflect posterior translation of the ITB during the 0° to 45° flexion arc of motion in both the supine and standing positions. Conclusions-Sonographic evaluation of the ITB in our study population clearly revealed anteroposterior motion of the ITB relative to the LFE during knee flexionextension. Our results indicate that the ITB does in fact move relative to the femur during the functional ranges of knee motion. Future investigations examining ITB motion in symptomatic populations may provide further insight into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of ITB syndrome and facilitate the development of more effective treatment strategies.

AB - Objectives-The purpose of this study was to determine whether the iliotibial band (ITB) moves relative to the lateral femoral epicondyle (LFE) as a function of knee flexion in both non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing positions in asymptomatic recreational runners. Methods-Five male and 15 female asymptomatic recreational runners (10-30 miles/wk) aged 18 to 40 years were examined with sonography to assess the distance between the anterior fibers of the ITB and the LFE in full extension, 30° of knee flexion, and 45° of knee flexion. Measurements were obtained on both knees in the supine (non- weight-bearing) and standing (weight-bearing) positions. Results-The distance between the anterior fibers of the ITB and the LFE decreased significantly from full extension to 45° of knee flexion in both supine (0.38-cm average decrease; P< .001) and standing (0.71-cm average decrease; P< .001) positions. These changes reflect posterior translation of the ITB during the 0° to 45° flexion arc of motion in both the supine and standing positions. Conclusions-Sonographic evaluation of the ITB in our study population clearly revealed anteroposterior motion of the ITB relative to the LFE during knee flexionextension. Our results indicate that the ITB does in fact move relative to the femur during the functional ranges of knee motion. Future investigations examining ITB motion in symptomatic populations may provide further insight into the pathophysiologic mechanisms of ITB syndrome and facilitate the development of more effective treatment strategies.

KW - Iliotibial band

KW - Iliotibial band syndrome

KW - Sonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880262203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880262203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7863/ultra.32.7.1199

DO - 10.7863/ultra.32.7.1199

M3 - Article

C2 - 23804342

AN - SCOPUS:84880262203

VL - 32

SP - 1199

EP - 1206

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 7

ER -