TY - JOUR
T1 - SNOMED CT
T2 - utility for a general medical evaluation template.
AU - Brown, Steven H.
AU - Elkin, Peter L.
AU - Bauer, Brent A.
AU - Wahner-Roedler, Dietlind
AU - Husser, Casey S.
AU - Temesgen, Zelalem
AU - Hardenbrook, Shawn P.
AU - Fielstein, Elliot M.
AU - Rosenbloom, S. Trent
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - BACKGROUND: The U.S. government has licensed SNOMED CT to permit broad-based evaluation and use of the terminology. We evaluated the ability of SNOMED CT to represent terms used for interface objects (e.g., labels and captions) and concepts used for data and branching logic in a general medical evaluation template in use within the Department of Veterans Affairs. METHODS: The general medical evaluation form definition, report definition, and script files were parsed and 1573 expressions were mapped into SNOMED CT. Compositional expressions required to represent 1171 concepts. Double independent reviews were conducted. Exact concept level matches were used to evaluate reference coverage. Exact term level matches were required for interface terms. Semantics were analyzed for a randomly selected subset of 20 terms. RESULTS: Sensitivity of SNOMED CT as a reference terminology was 63.8% , ranging from 29.3% for history items to 92.4% for exam items. SNOMED CT's sensitivity as an "interface terminology" was 55.0%. 80% of the necessary linking semantics for the subset were present. Subgroup statistics are presented. DISCUSSION: SNOMED CT is promising as a terminology for knowledge representation underlying a large general medical evaluation. Its performed less well as an interface terminology.
AB - BACKGROUND: The U.S. government has licensed SNOMED CT to permit broad-based evaluation and use of the terminology. We evaluated the ability of SNOMED CT to represent terms used for interface objects (e.g., labels and captions) and concepts used for data and branching logic in a general medical evaluation template in use within the Department of Veterans Affairs. METHODS: The general medical evaluation form definition, report definition, and script files were parsed and 1573 expressions were mapped into SNOMED CT. Compositional expressions required to represent 1171 concepts. Double independent reviews were conducted. Exact concept level matches were used to evaluate reference coverage. Exact term level matches were required for interface terms. Semantics were analyzed for a randomly selected subset of 20 terms. RESULTS: Sensitivity of SNOMED CT as a reference terminology was 63.8% , ranging from 29.3% for history items to 92.4% for exam items. SNOMED CT's sensitivity as an "interface terminology" was 55.0%. 80% of the necessary linking semantics for the subset were present. Subgroup statistics are presented. DISCUSSION: SNOMED CT is promising as a terminology for knowledge representation underlying a large general medical evaluation. Its performed less well as an interface terminology.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34748883028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34748883028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 17238311
AN - SCOPUS:34748883028
SN - 1559-4076
SP - 101
EP - 105
JO - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
JF - AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium
ER -