TY - JOUR
T1 - Small (< 4 cm) renal mass
T2 - Differentiation of oncocytoma from renal cell carcinoma on biphasic contrast-enhanced CT
AU - Sasaguri, Kohei
AU - Takahashi, Naoki
AU - Gomez-Cardona, Daniel
AU - Leng, Shuai
AU - Schmit, Grant D.
AU - Carter, Rickey E.
AU - Leibovich, Bradley C.
AU - Kawashima, Akira
PY - 2015/11
Y1 - 2015/11
N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether small (< 4 cm) oncocytomas can be differentiated from renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) on biphasic contrast-enhanced CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-three patients with 53 oncocytomas and 123 patients with 128 RCCs (24 papillary subtype and 104 clear cell and other subtypes) who underwent biphasic contrast-enhanced CT were included in the study. Patient demographics and CT tumor characteristics were evaluated in each case. A multinomial logistic regression model was then constructed for differentiating oncocytoma from clear cell and other subtype RCCs, oncocytoma from papillary RCCs, and clear cell and other subtype RCCs from papillary RCCs. The probability of each group was calculated from the model. Diagnostic performance among three pairwise diagnoses and between oncocytoma and any RCC (clear cell and other subtypes and papillary) were assessed by AUC values. RESULTS. Patient age, tumor CT attenuation values and skewness (i.e., histogram analysis of CT values) in both the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases, and subjective tumor heterogeneity were statistically significant variables in the multinomial logistic regression analysis. The logistic regression model using the variables yielded AUCs of 0.82, 0.95, 0.91, and 0.84 for differentiating oncocytomas from clear cell and other subtype RCCs, oncocytomas from papillary RCCs, clear cell and other subtype RCCs from papillary RCCs, and oncocytomas from any RCC (clear cell and other subtypes and papillary), respectively. CONCLUSION. A combination of imaging features on biphasic CT, including tumor CT attenuation values and tumor texture (heterogeneity and skewness), can help differentiate oncocytoma from RCC.
AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether small (< 4 cm) oncocytomas can be differentiated from renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) on biphasic contrast-enhanced CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-three patients with 53 oncocytomas and 123 patients with 128 RCCs (24 papillary subtype and 104 clear cell and other subtypes) who underwent biphasic contrast-enhanced CT were included in the study. Patient demographics and CT tumor characteristics were evaluated in each case. A multinomial logistic regression model was then constructed for differentiating oncocytoma from clear cell and other subtype RCCs, oncocytoma from papillary RCCs, and clear cell and other subtype RCCs from papillary RCCs. The probability of each group was calculated from the model. Diagnostic performance among three pairwise diagnoses and between oncocytoma and any RCC (clear cell and other subtypes and papillary) were assessed by AUC values. RESULTS. Patient age, tumor CT attenuation values and skewness (i.e., histogram analysis of CT values) in both the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases, and subjective tumor heterogeneity were statistically significant variables in the multinomial logistic regression analysis. The logistic regression model using the variables yielded AUCs of 0.82, 0.95, 0.91, and 0.84 for differentiating oncocytomas from clear cell and other subtype RCCs, oncocytomas from papillary RCCs, clear cell and other subtype RCCs from papillary RCCs, and oncocytomas from any RCC (clear cell and other subtypes and papillary), respectively. CONCLUSION. A combination of imaging features on biphasic CT, including tumor CT attenuation values and tumor texture (heterogeneity and skewness), can help differentiate oncocytoma from RCC.
KW - CT
KW - Differential diagnosis
KW - Kidney
KW - Renal cell carcinoma
KW - Renal oncocytoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944880826&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944880826&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/AJR.14.13966
DO - 10.2214/AJR.14.13966
M3 - Article
C2 - 26496547
AN - SCOPUS:84944880826
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 205
SP - 999
EP - 1007
JO - The American journal of roentgenology and radium therapy
JF - The American journal of roentgenology and radium therapy
IS - 5
ER -