Single-pass CT of hepatic tumors: Value of globular enhancement in distinguishing hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases

D. F. Leslie, C. Daniel Johnson, R. L. MacCarty, E. M. Ward, D. M. Ilstrup, W. S. Harmsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of globular enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases on single-pass, contrast-enhanced CT scans. Globular enhancement was defined as enhancing nodules less than 1 cm seen within a lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated in a blinded fashion by two independent reviewers. The CT studies were done with nonhelical technique after the IV injection of 150 ml of contrast material. The series included 25 patients with histologically proven hypervascular hepatic metastases (carcinoid, islet cell carcinoma, and leiomyosarcoma) and 25 patients with clinically proven hepatic hemangiomas. Patients with hemangiomas were clinically stable for at least 2 years after the CT studies. A single lesion was isolated from the first-pass, contrast-enhanced portion of each examination; the remainder of the examination was excluded from the review to minimize reviewer bias. Each lesion was evaluated for (1) the presence or absence of globular enhancement (defined as enhancing nodules less than 1 cm seen within a lesion), (2) the density of globular enhancement relative to that of the aorta, (3) the degree of border definition (well or poorly marginated), and (4) the presence or absence of a hypodense halo. A diagnostic impression was then recorded for each lesion. RESULTS. Globular enhancement was 88% sensitive and 84-100% specific for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases (p < .001). A mean of 62% of hemangiomas showed globular enhancement isodense relative to that of the aorta; none of the metastases showed globular, isodense enhancement. The majority of the metastases showed nonglobular enhancement (mean, 92%). The reviewers showed 84% agreement in the identification of (1) globular enhancement in hemangiomas, (2) lack of globular enhancement in metastases, and (3) globular enhancement in the combined set of all lesions. Neither the presence of a hypodense halo nor the degree of border definition was significant in distinguishing between the two groups of lesions. The reviewers showed 96% agreement in the categorization of matastases and 76% agreement in the categorization of hemangiomas. There was 86% agreement in the categorization of all lesions. Overall, reviewers diagnosed a mean of 89% of lesions correctly. A mean of 98% of metastases and a mean of 80% of hemangiomas were diagnosed correctly. CONCLUSION. Globular enhancement is highly sensitive (88%) and specific (84100%) for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases on single- pass, contrast-enhanced CT scans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1403-1406
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume165
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Hemangioma
Neoplasm Metastasis
Liver
Neoplasms
Aorta
Islet Cell Carcinoma
Leiomyosarcoma
Carcinoid Tumor
Contrast Media
Sensitivity and Specificity
Injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Single-pass CT of hepatic tumors : Value of globular enhancement in distinguishing hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases. / Leslie, D. F.; Johnson, C. Daniel; MacCarty, R. L.; Ward, E. M.; Ilstrup, D. M.; Harmsen, W. S.

In: American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 165, No. 6, 01.01.1995, p. 1403-1406.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leslie, D. F. ; Johnson, C. Daniel ; MacCarty, R. L. ; Ward, E. M. ; Ilstrup, D. M. ; Harmsen, W. S. / Single-pass CT of hepatic tumors : Value of globular enhancement in distinguishing hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases. In: American Journal of Roentgenology. 1995 ; Vol. 165, No. 6. pp. 1403-1406.
@article{7539018bc9a04a3eaf51093d3961cd87,
title = "Single-pass CT of hepatic tumors: Value of globular enhancement in distinguishing hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of globular enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases on single-pass, contrast-enhanced CT scans. Globular enhancement was defined as enhancing nodules less than 1 cm seen within a lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated in a blinded fashion by two independent reviewers. The CT studies were done with nonhelical technique after the IV injection of 150 ml of contrast material. The series included 25 patients with histologically proven hypervascular hepatic metastases (carcinoid, islet cell carcinoma, and leiomyosarcoma) and 25 patients with clinically proven hepatic hemangiomas. Patients with hemangiomas were clinically stable for at least 2 years after the CT studies. A single lesion was isolated from the first-pass, contrast-enhanced portion of each examination; the remainder of the examination was excluded from the review to minimize reviewer bias. Each lesion was evaluated for (1) the presence or absence of globular enhancement (defined as enhancing nodules less than 1 cm seen within a lesion), (2) the density of globular enhancement relative to that of the aorta, (3) the degree of border definition (well or poorly marginated), and (4) the presence or absence of a hypodense halo. A diagnostic impression was then recorded for each lesion. RESULTS. Globular enhancement was 88{\%} sensitive and 84-100{\%} specific for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases (p < .001). A mean of 62{\%} of hemangiomas showed globular enhancement isodense relative to that of the aorta; none of the metastases showed globular, isodense enhancement. The majority of the metastases showed nonglobular enhancement (mean, 92{\%}). The reviewers showed 84{\%} agreement in the identification of (1) globular enhancement in hemangiomas, (2) lack of globular enhancement in metastases, and (3) globular enhancement in the combined set of all lesions. Neither the presence of a hypodense halo nor the degree of border definition was significant in distinguishing between the two groups of lesions. The reviewers showed 96{\%} agreement in the categorization of matastases and 76{\%} agreement in the categorization of hemangiomas. There was 86{\%} agreement in the categorization of all lesions. Overall, reviewers diagnosed a mean of 89{\%} of lesions correctly. A mean of 98{\%} of metastases and a mean of 80{\%} of hemangiomas were diagnosed correctly. CONCLUSION. Globular enhancement is highly sensitive (88{\%}) and specific (84100{\%}) for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases on single- pass, contrast-enhanced CT scans.",
author = "Leslie, {D. F.} and Johnson, {C. Daniel} and MacCarty, {R. L.} and Ward, {E. M.} and Ilstrup, {D. M.} and Harmsen, {W. S.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484574",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "165",
pages = "1403--1406",
journal = "American Journal of Roentgenology",
issn = "0361-803X",
publisher = "American Roentgen Ray Society",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single-pass CT of hepatic tumors

T2 - Value of globular enhancement in distinguishing hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases

AU - Leslie, D. F.

AU - Johnson, C. Daniel

AU - MacCarty, R. L.

AU - Ward, E. M.

AU - Ilstrup, D. M.

AU - Harmsen, W. S.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of globular enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases on single-pass, contrast-enhanced CT scans. Globular enhancement was defined as enhancing nodules less than 1 cm seen within a lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated in a blinded fashion by two independent reviewers. The CT studies were done with nonhelical technique after the IV injection of 150 ml of contrast material. The series included 25 patients with histologically proven hypervascular hepatic metastases (carcinoid, islet cell carcinoma, and leiomyosarcoma) and 25 patients with clinically proven hepatic hemangiomas. Patients with hemangiomas were clinically stable for at least 2 years after the CT studies. A single lesion was isolated from the first-pass, contrast-enhanced portion of each examination; the remainder of the examination was excluded from the review to minimize reviewer bias. Each lesion was evaluated for (1) the presence or absence of globular enhancement (defined as enhancing nodules less than 1 cm seen within a lesion), (2) the density of globular enhancement relative to that of the aorta, (3) the degree of border definition (well or poorly marginated), and (4) the presence or absence of a hypodense halo. A diagnostic impression was then recorded for each lesion. RESULTS. Globular enhancement was 88% sensitive and 84-100% specific for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases (p < .001). A mean of 62% of hemangiomas showed globular enhancement isodense relative to that of the aorta; none of the metastases showed globular, isodense enhancement. The majority of the metastases showed nonglobular enhancement (mean, 92%). The reviewers showed 84% agreement in the identification of (1) globular enhancement in hemangiomas, (2) lack of globular enhancement in metastases, and (3) globular enhancement in the combined set of all lesions. Neither the presence of a hypodense halo nor the degree of border definition was significant in distinguishing between the two groups of lesions. The reviewers showed 96% agreement in the categorization of matastases and 76% agreement in the categorization of hemangiomas. There was 86% agreement in the categorization of all lesions. Overall, reviewers diagnosed a mean of 89% of lesions correctly. A mean of 98% of metastases and a mean of 80% of hemangiomas were diagnosed correctly. CONCLUSION. Globular enhancement is highly sensitive (88%) and specific (84100%) for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases on single- pass, contrast-enhanced CT scans.

AB - OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of globular enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases on single-pass, contrast-enhanced CT scans. Globular enhancement was defined as enhancing nodules less than 1 cm seen within a lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Fifty CT examinations were retrospectively evaluated in a blinded fashion by two independent reviewers. The CT studies were done with nonhelical technique after the IV injection of 150 ml of contrast material. The series included 25 patients with histologically proven hypervascular hepatic metastases (carcinoid, islet cell carcinoma, and leiomyosarcoma) and 25 patients with clinically proven hepatic hemangiomas. Patients with hemangiomas were clinically stable for at least 2 years after the CT studies. A single lesion was isolated from the first-pass, contrast-enhanced portion of each examination; the remainder of the examination was excluded from the review to minimize reviewer bias. Each lesion was evaluated for (1) the presence or absence of globular enhancement (defined as enhancing nodules less than 1 cm seen within a lesion), (2) the density of globular enhancement relative to that of the aorta, (3) the degree of border definition (well or poorly marginated), and (4) the presence or absence of a hypodense halo. A diagnostic impression was then recorded for each lesion. RESULTS. Globular enhancement was 88% sensitive and 84-100% specific for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases (p < .001). A mean of 62% of hemangiomas showed globular enhancement isodense relative to that of the aorta; none of the metastases showed globular, isodense enhancement. The majority of the metastases showed nonglobular enhancement (mean, 92%). The reviewers showed 84% agreement in the identification of (1) globular enhancement in hemangiomas, (2) lack of globular enhancement in metastases, and (3) globular enhancement in the combined set of all lesions. Neither the presence of a hypodense halo nor the degree of border definition was significant in distinguishing between the two groups of lesions. The reviewers showed 96% agreement in the categorization of matastases and 76% agreement in the categorization of hemangiomas. There was 86% agreement in the categorization of all lesions. Overall, reviewers diagnosed a mean of 89% of lesions correctly. A mean of 98% of metastases and a mean of 80% of hemangiomas were diagnosed correctly. CONCLUSION. Globular enhancement is highly sensitive (88%) and specific (84100%) for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases on single- pass, contrast-enhanced CT scans.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028803547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028803547&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484574

DO - 10.2214/ajr.165.6.7484574

M3 - Article

C2 - 7484574

AN - SCOPUS:0028803547

VL - 165

SP - 1403

EP - 1406

JO - American Journal of Roentgenology

JF - American Journal of Roentgenology

SN - 0361-803X

IS - 6

ER -