TY - JOUR
T1 - Simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors
T2 - an updated perspective
AU - Nunez-Nateras, Rafael
AU - Reddy, Kunam S.
AU - Aqel, Bashar A.
AU - Heilman, Raymond
AU - Morgan, Paige
AU - Mathur, Amit K.
AU - Hewitt, Winston
AU - Heimbach, Julie
AU - Rosen, Charles
AU - Moss, Adyr A.
AU - Taner, Timucin
AU - Jadlowiec, Caroline C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Outcomes of both donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver and kidney transplants are improving. Experience in simultaneous liver–kidney transplant (SLK) using DCD donors, however, remains limited. In an updated cohort (2010-2018), outcomes of 30 DCD SLK and 131 donation after brain death (DBD) SLK from Mayo Clinic Arizona and Mayo Clinic Minnesota were reviewed. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was lower in the DCD SLK group (23 vs 29, P =.01). Kidney delayed graft function (DGF) rates were similar between the 2 groups (P =.11), although the duration of DGF was longer for DCD SLK recipients (20 vs 4 days, P =.01). Liver allograft (93.3% vs 93.1%, P =.29), kidney allograft (93.3% vs 93.1%, P =.91), and patient (96.7% vs 95.4%, P =.70) 1-year survival rates were similar. At 1 year, there were no differences in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (57.7 ± 18.2 vs 56.3 ± 17.7, P =.75) or progression of fibrosis (ci) on protocol kidney biopsy (P =.67). A higher incidence of biliary complications was observed in the DCD SLK group, with ischemic cholangiopathy being the most common (10.0% vs 0.0%, P =.03). The majority of biliary complications resolved with endoscopic management. With appropriate selection, DCD SLK recipients can have results equivalent to those of DBD SLK recipients.
AB - Outcomes of both donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver and kidney transplants are improving. Experience in simultaneous liver–kidney transplant (SLK) using DCD donors, however, remains limited. In an updated cohort (2010-2018), outcomes of 30 DCD SLK and 131 donation after brain death (DBD) SLK from Mayo Clinic Arizona and Mayo Clinic Minnesota were reviewed. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was lower in the DCD SLK group (23 vs 29, P =.01). Kidney delayed graft function (DGF) rates were similar between the 2 groups (P =.11), although the duration of DGF was longer for DCD SLK recipients (20 vs 4 days, P =.01). Liver allograft (93.3% vs 93.1%, P =.29), kidney allograft (93.3% vs 93.1%, P =.91), and patient (96.7% vs 95.4%, P =.70) 1-year survival rates were similar. At 1 year, there were no differences in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (57.7 ± 18.2 vs 56.3 ± 17.7, P =.75) or progression of fibrosis (ci) on protocol kidney biopsy (P =.67). A higher incidence of biliary complications was observed in the DCD SLK group, with ischemic cholangiopathy being the most common (10.0% vs 0.0%, P =.03). The majority of biliary complications resolved with endoscopic management. With appropriate selection, DCD SLK recipients can have results equivalent to those of DBD SLK recipients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091491577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091491577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ajt.16191
DO - 10.1111/ajt.16191
M3 - Article
C2 - 32654322
AN - SCOPUS:85091491577
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 20
SP - 3582
EP - 3589
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
IS - 12
ER -