Simultaneous Evaluation of Safety, Acceptability, Pericoital Kinetics, and Ex Vivo Pharmacodynamics Comparing Four Rectal Microbicide Vehicle Candidates

Francisco Leyva, Edward J. Fuchs, Rahul Bakshi, Alex Carballo-Dieguez, Ana Ventuneac, Chen Yue, Brian Caffo, Yong Du, Michael Torbenson, Liye Li, Gerald Mullin, Linda Lee, Lisa Rohan, Peter A. Anton, Craig W. Hendrix

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of HIV infection with tenofovir-containing regimens is effective, but plagued by poor adherence in some studies. Options for safe, effective, and acceptable PrEP products, especially for men and women at risk of HIV via receptive anal intercourse (RAI), are needed. We performed a randomized, partially blinded, first-in-human evaluation of four candidate rectal microbicide vehicles - aqueous gel, aqueous fluid, lipid gel, and lipid fluid - to select a prototype for further clinical development. Eight seronegative participants received three doses of each product with each dose separated by at least 2 weeks: one dose was given alone without simulated RAI in clinic, another dose was followed by simulated RAI in clinic, and another dose was self-administered at home in the context of RAI with a partner. Assessments included safety, acceptability, colon histology, ex vivo HIV infectivity of colon tissue explants, and colonic luminal distribution of vehicle and HIV surrogates. Adverse events were all mild and mainly sigmoidoscopy associated. There were minor differences in colon distribution of products and little effect of RAI. Vehicle distribution covered 95% (±7% standard deviation) of the distribution of an HIV surrogate in the colonic lumen. The lipid fluid vehicle increased HIV colon tissue infectability 5-fold [log10 p24 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.08, 1.28)] and aqueous gel provided 6-fold protection [log10 p24 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.20, 1.41)] compared to no product baseline. Colon permeability of lipid vehicles was more than 10-fold greater than aqueous vehicles. All products received similar acceptability ratings, though trends favored the gel products. Intensive simultaneous assessment of safety and toxicity, luminal and tissue distribution, ex vivo HIV infectivity, and product acceptability in relevant sexual contexts provided clear differentiation among candidate gels very early in product development. We selected the aqueous gel for further development as a rectal microbicide vehicle.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1089-1097
Number of pages9
JournalAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
Volume31
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology
  • Virology
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Leyva, F., Fuchs, E. J., Bakshi, R., Carballo-Dieguez, A., Ventuneac, A., Yue, C., Caffo, B., Du, Y., Torbenson, M., Li, L., Mullin, G., Lee, L., Rohan, L., Anton, P. A., & Hendrix, C. W. (2015). Simultaneous Evaluation of Safety, Acceptability, Pericoital Kinetics, and Ex Vivo Pharmacodynamics Comparing Four Rectal Microbicide Vehicle Candidates. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 31(11), 1089-1097. https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.2015.0086