Simulation training for breast and pelvic physical examination: A systematic review and meta-analysis

C. A. Dilaveri, J. H. Szostek, A. T. Wang, David Allan Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Breast and pelvic examinations are challenging intimate examinations. Technology-based simulation may help to overcome these challenges. Objective To synthesise the evidence regarding the effectiveness of technology-based simulation training for breast and pelvic examination. Search strategy Our systematic search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus, and key journals and review articles; the date of the last search was January 2012. Selection criteria Original research studies evaluating technology-enhanced simulation of breast and pelvic examination to teach learners, compared with no intervention or with other educational activities. Data collection and analysis The reviewers evaluated study eligibility and abstracted data on methodological quality, learners, instructional design, and outcomes, and used random-effects models to pool weighted effect sizes. Main results In total, 11 272 articles were identified for screening, and 22 studies were eligible, enrolling 2036 trainees. In eight studies comparing simulation for breast examination training with no intervention, simulation was associated with a significant improvement in skill, with a pooled effect size of 0.86 (95% CI 0.52-1.19; P < 0.001). Four studies comparing simulation training for pelvic examination with no intervention had a large and significant benefit, with a pooled effect size of 1.18 (95% CI 0.40-1.96; P = 0.003). Among breast examination simulation studies, dynamic models providing feedback were associated with improved outcomes. In pelvic examination simulation studies, the addition of a standardised patient to the simulation model and the use of an electronic model with enhanced feedback improved outcomes. Author's conclusions In comparison with no intervention, breast and pelvic examination simulation training is associated with moderate to large effects for skills outcomes. Enhanced feedback appears to improve learning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1171-1182
Number of pages12
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume120
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Gynecological Examination
Physical Examination
Meta-Analysis
Breast
Technology
Patient Simulation
MEDLINE
Patient Selection
Simulation Training
Learning
Education
Research

Keywords

  • Breast examination
  • pelvic examination
  • simulation training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Simulation training for breast and pelvic physical examination : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Dilaveri, C. A.; Szostek, J. H.; Wang, A. T.; Cook, David Allan.

In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 120, No. 10, 09.2013, p. 1171-1182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15ea85f0fcdf4637a8cc4ba8ba962618,
title = "Simulation training for breast and pelvic physical examination: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background Breast and pelvic examinations are challenging intimate examinations. Technology-based simulation may help to overcome these challenges. Objective To synthesise the evidence regarding the effectiveness of technology-based simulation training for breast and pelvic examination. Search strategy Our systematic search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus, and key journals and review articles; the date of the last search was January 2012. Selection criteria Original research studies evaluating technology-enhanced simulation of breast and pelvic examination to teach learners, compared with no intervention or with other educational activities. Data collection and analysis The reviewers evaluated study eligibility and abstracted data on methodological quality, learners, instructional design, and outcomes, and used random-effects models to pool weighted effect sizes. Main results In total, 11 272 articles were identified for screening, and 22 studies were eligible, enrolling 2036 trainees. In eight studies comparing simulation for breast examination training with no intervention, simulation was associated with a significant improvement in skill, with a pooled effect size of 0.86 (95{\%} CI 0.52-1.19; P < 0.001). Four studies comparing simulation training for pelvic examination with no intervention had a large and significant benefit, with a pooled effect size of 1.18 (95{\%} CI 0.40-1.96; P = 0.003). Among breast examination simulation studies, dynamic models providing feedback were associated with improved outcomes. In pelvic examination simulation studies, the addition of a standardised patient to the simulation model and the use of an electronic model with enhanced feedback improved outcomes. Author's conclusions In comparison with no intervention, breast and pelvic examination simulation training is associated with moderate to large effects for skills outcomes. Enhanced feedback appears to improve learning.",
keywords = "Breast examination, pelvic examination, simulation training",
author = "Dilaveri, {C. A.} and Szostek, {J. H.} and Wang, {A. T.} and Cook, {David Allan}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.12289",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "1171--1182",
journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulation training for breast and pelvic physical examination

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Dilaveri, C. A.

AU - Szostek, J. H.

AU - Wang, A. T.

AU - Cook, David Allan

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Background Breast and pelvic examinations are challenging intimate examinations. Technology-based simulation may help to overcome these challenges. Objective To synthesise the evidence regarding the effectiveness of technology-based simulation training for breast and pelvic examination. Search strategy Our systematic search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus, and key journals and review articles; the date of the last search was January 2012. Selection criteria Original research studies evaluating technology-enhanced simulation of breast and pelvic examination to teach learners, compared with no intervention or with other educational activities. Data collection and analysis The reviewers evaluated study eligibility and abstracted data on methodological quality, learners, instructional design, and outcomes, and used random-effects models to pool weighted effect sizes. Main results In total, 11 272 articles were identified for screening, and 22 studies were eligible, enrolling 2036 trainees. In eight studies comparing simulation for breast examination training with no intervention, simulation was associated with a significant improvement in skill, with a pooled effect size of 0.86 (95% CI 0.52-1.19; P < 0.001). Four studies comparing simulation training for pelvic examination with no intervention had a large and significant benefit, with a pooled effect size of 1.18 (95% CI 0.40-1.96; P = 0.003). Among breast examination simulation studies, dynamic models providing feedback were associated with improved outcomes. In pelvic examination simulation studies, the addition of a standardised patient to the simulation model and the use of an electronic model with enhanced feedback improved outcomes. Author's conclusions In comparison with no intervention, breast and pelvic examination simulation training is associated with moderate to large effects for skills outcomes. Enhanced feedback appears to improve learning.

AB - Background Breast and pelvic examinations are challenging intimate examinations. Technology-based simulation may help to overcome these challenges. Objective To synthesise the evidence regarding the effectiveness of technology-based simulation training for breast and pelvic examination. Search strategy Our systematic search included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Scopus, and key journals and review articles; the date of the last search was January 2012. Selection criteria Original research studies evaluating technology-enhanced simulation of breast and pelvic examination to teach learners, compared with no intervention or with other educational activities. Data collection and analysis The reviewers evaluated study eligibility and abstracted data on methodological quality, learners, instructional design, and outcomes, and used random-effects models to pool weighted effect sizes. Main results In total, 11 272 articles were identified for screening, and 22 studies were eligible, enrolling 2036 trainees. In eight studies comparing simulation for breast examination training with no intervention, simulation was associated with a significant improvement in skill, with a pooled effect size of 0.86 (95% CI 0.52-1.19; P < 0.001). Four studies comparing simulation training for pelvic examination with no intervention had a large and significant benefit, with a pooled effect size of 1.18 (95% CI 0.40-1.96; P = 0.003). Among breast examination simulation studies, dynamic models providing feedback were associated with improved outcomes. In pelvic examination simulation studies, the addition of a standardised patient to the simulation model and the use of an electronic model with enhanced feedback improved outcomes. Author's conclusions In comparison with no intervention, breast and pelvic examination simulation training is associated with moderate to large effects for skills outcomes. Enhanced feedback appears to improve learning.

KW - Breast examination

KW - pelvic examination

KW - simulation training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882238866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882238866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.12289

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.12289

M3 - Article

C2 - 23750657

AN - SCOPUS:84882238866

VL - 120

SP - 1171

EP - 1182

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 10

ER -