Should endovascular approach be considered as the first option for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms?

Jussi M. Kärkkäinen, Keouna Pather, Emanuel R. Tenorio, Barend Mees, Gustavo Oderich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). The technique of open TAAA repair has evolved from the use of "island" patch incorporation to separate branch vessel bypass, from "clamp and go" to routine use of distal perfusion, and towards more extensive repair in patients with connective tissue disorders. Open TAAA repair can be done with excellent results in highly specialized centers. However, these operations continue to carry excessive risk when performed outside large aortic centers, with 30-day mortality estimated on 20% according to statewide and national databases. In octogenarians, the mortality of elective open TAAA repair can be up to 40%. Endovascular repair was introduced as an alternative to open surgical repair in the elderly or higher risk patients using hybrid reconstruction, parallel grafts or fenestrated and branched endografts. Several large aortic centers have developed dedicated clinical programs to advance techniques of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair using patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices, offering a minimally invasive alternative to open repair allowing treatment of increasingly older and sicker TAAA patients. During the last decade, improvements in device design, patient selection, spinal cord injury protocols, and perioperative management have contributed to a continued decline in morbidity and mortality of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair, challenging open surgical repair as the new "gold standard" for treatment of TAAAs. Despite the improved results, endovascular repair is a highly technical procedure that requires vast experience, involves a significant risk of complications, and also, has an impact on patients' physical quality of life. In this article, we review the current technical aspects of endovascular TAAA repair with the main focus on the evidence of open versus endovascular outcomes of TAAA repair.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)298-312
Number of pages15
JournalThe Journal of cardiovascular surgery
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Mortality
Equipment Design
Spinal Cord Injuries
Islands
Connective Tissue
Patient Selection
Therapeutics
Perfusion
Quality of Life
Databases
Morbidity
Transplants
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Should endovascular approach be considered as the first option for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms? / Kärkkäinen, Jussi M.; Pather, Keouna; Tenorio, Emanuel R.; Mees, Barend; Oderich, Gustavo.

In: The Journal of cardiovascular surgery, Vol. 60, No. 3, 01.06.2019, p. 298-312.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kärkkäinen, Jussi M. ; Pather, Keouna ; Tenorio, Emanuel R. ; Mees, Barend ; Oderich, Gustavo. / Should endovascular approach be considered as the first option for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms?. In: The Journal of cardiovascular surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 60, No. 3. pp. 298-312.
@article{9bdfab54416e4c508c2ffc82e8acd40d,
title = "Should endovascular approach be considered as the first option for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms?",
abstract = "Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). The technique of open TAAA repair has evolved from the use of {"}island{"} patch incorporation to separate branch vessel bypass, from {"}clamp and go{"} to routine use of distal perfusion, and towards more extensive repair in patients with connective tissue disorders. Open TAAA repair can be done with excellent results in highly specialized centers. However, these operations continue to carry excessive risk when performed outside large aortic centers, with 30-day mortality estimated on 20{\%} according to statewide and national databases. In octogenarians, the mortality of elective open TAAA repair can be up to 40{\%}. Endovascular repair was introduced as an alternative to open surgical repair in the elderly or higher risk patients using hybrid reconstruction, parallel grafts or fenestrated and branched endografts. Several large aortic centers have developed dedicated clinical programs to advance techniques of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair using patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices, offering a minimally invasive alternative to open repair allowing treatment of increasingly older and sicker TAAA patients. During the last decade, improvements in device design, patient selection, spinal cord injury protocols, and perioperative management have contributed to a continued decline in morbidity and mortality of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair, challenging open surgical repair as the new {"}gold standard{"} for treatment of TAAAs. Despite the improved results, endovascular repair is a highly technical procedure that requires vast experience, involves a significant risk of complications, and also, has an impact on patients' physical quality of life. In this article, we review the current technical aspects of endovascular TAAA repair with the main focus on the evidence of open versus endovascular outcomes of TAAA repair.",
author = "K{\"a}rkk{\"a}inen, {Jussi M.} and Keouna Pather and Tenorio, {Emanuel R.} and Barend Mees and Gustavo Oderich",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10905-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "60",
pages = "298--312",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "0021-9509",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should endovascular approach be considered as the first option for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms?

AU - Kärkkäinen, Jussi M.

AU - Pather, Keouna

AU - Tenorio, Emanuel R.

AU - Mees, Barend

AU - Oderich, Gustavo

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). The technique of open TAAA repair has evolved from the use of "island" patch incorporation to separate branch vessel bypass, from "clamp and go" to routine use of distal perfusion, and towards more extensive repair in patients with connective tissue disorders. Open TAAA repair can be done with excellent results in highly specialized centers. However, these operations continue to carry excessive risk when performed outside large aortic centers, with 30-day mortality estimated on 20% according to statewide and national databases. In octogenarians, the mortality of elective open TAAA repair can be up to 40%. Endovascular repair was introduced as an alternative to open surgical repair in the elderly or higher risk patients using hybrid reconstruction, parallel grafts or fenestrated and branched endografts. Several large aortic centers have developed dedicated clinical programs to advance techniques of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair using patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices, offering a minimally invasive alternative to open repair allowing treatment of increasingly older and sicker TAAA patients. During the last decade, improvements in device design, patient selection, spinal cord injury protocols, and perioperative management have contributed to a continued decline in morbidity and mortality of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair, challenging open surgical repair as the new "gold standard" for treatment of TAAAs. Despite the improved results, endovascular repair is a highly technical procedure that requires vast experience, involves a significant risk of complications, and also, has an impact on patients' physical quality of life. In this article, we review the current technical aspects of endovascular TAAA repair with the main focus on the evidence of open versus endovascular outcomes of TAAA repair.

AB - Open surgical repair has been the gold standard for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). The technique of open TAAA repair has evolved from the use of "island" patch incorporation to separate branch vessel bypass, from "clamp and go" to routine use of distal perfusion, and towards more extensive repair in patients with connective tissue disorders. Open TAAA repair can be done with excellent results in highly specialized centers. However, these operations continue to carry excessive risk when performed outside large aortic centers, with 30-day mortality estimated on 20% according to statewide and national databases. In octogenarians, the mortality of elective open TAAA repair can be up to 40%. Endovascular repair was introduced as an alternative to open surgical repair in the elderly or higher risk patients using hybrid reconstruction, parallel grafts or fenestrated and branched endografts. Several large aortic centers have developed dedicated clinical programs to advance techniques of fenestrated-branched endovascular repair using patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices, offering a minimally invasive alternative to open repair allowing treatment of increasingly older and sicker TAAA patients. During the last decade, improvements in device design, patient selection, spinal cord injury protocols, and perioperative management have contributed to a continued decline in morbidity and mortality of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair, challenging open surgical repair as the new "gold standard" for treatment of TAAAs. Despite the improved results, endovascular repair is a highly technical procedure that requires vast experience, involves a significant risk of complications, and also, has an impact on patients' physical quality of life. In this article, we review the current technical aspects of endovascular TAAA repair with the main focus on the evidence of open versus endovascular outcomes of TAAA repair.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066819646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066819646&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10905-6

DO - 10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10905-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 30855116

AN - SCOPUS:85066819646

VL - 60

SP - 298

EP - 312

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 0021-9509

IS - 3

ER -