Sex differences research, precision medicine, and the future of women's health

Virginia M Miller, Walter A Rocca, Stephanie S. Faubion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health's (NIH) commitment to improving health outcomes for women and men through rigorous science has been compromised by the lack of basic science evidence obtained from female animals. To correct this limitation, in June 2015 the NIH announced expectations that "sex," as a biological variable, be included into research design and analysis in studies of vertebrate animals and humans (NOT-OD-15-102). Scientists must take the responsibility to implement this directive. However, in doing so, there is a risk that attention could be restricted to only studies of direct comparison between female/women and male/men. By contrast, understanding how sex influences health and disease needs to take a programmatic approach that includes the study of sex-specific conditions. A programmatic approach will assure the advancement of knowledge to improve women's health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)969-971
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Women's Health
Volume24
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Precision Medicine
Women's Health
Sex Characteristics
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Research
Men's Health
Vertebrates
Research Design
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Sex differences research, precision medicine, and the future of women's health. / Miller, Virginia M; Rocca, Walter A; Faubion, Stephanie S.

In: Journal of Women's Health, Vol. 24, No. 12, 01.12.2015, p. 969-971.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cb376a48ebe742ecb3d666e327a28cce,
title = "Sex differences research, precision medicine, and the future of women's health",
abstract = "The National Institutes of Health's (NIH) commitment to improving health outcomes for women and men through rigorous science has been compromised by the lack of basic science evidence obtained from female animals. To correct this limitation, in June 2015 the NIH announced expectations that {"}sex,{"} as a biological variable, be included into research design and analysis in studies of vertebrate animals and humans (NOT-OD-15-102). Scientists must take the responsibility to implement this directive. However, in doing so, there is a risk that attention could be restricted to only studies of direct comparison between female/women and male/men. By contrast, understanding how sex influences health and disease needs to take a programmatic approach that includes the study of sex-specific conditions. A programmatic approach will assure the advancement of knowledge to improve women's health.",
author = "Miller, {Virginia M} and Rocca, {Walter A} and Faubion, {Stephanie S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jwh.2015.5498",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "969--971",
journal = "Journal of women's health (2002)",
issn = "1540-9996",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences research, precision medicine, and the future of women's health

AU - Miller, Virginia M

AU - Rocca, Walter A

AU - Faubion, Stephanie S.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The National Institutes of Health's (NIH) commitment to improving health outcomes for women and men through rigorous science has been compromised by the lack of basic science evidence obtained from female animals. To correct this limitation, in June 2015 the NIH announced expectations that "sex," as a biological variable, be included into research design and analysis in studies of vertebrate animals and humans (NOT-OD-15-102). Scientists must take the responsibility to implement this directive. However, in doing so, there is a risk that attention could be restricted to only studies of direct comparison between female/women and male/men. By contrast, understanding how sex influences health and disease needs to take a programmatic approach that includes the study of sex-specific conditions. A programmatic approach will assure the advancement of knowledge to improve women's health.

AB - The National Institutes of Health's (NIH) commitment to improving health outcomes for women and men through rigorous science has been compromised by the lack of basic science evidence obtained from female animals. To correct this limitation, in June 2015 the NIH announced expectations that "sex," as a biological variable, be included into research design and analysis in studies of vertebrate animals and humans (NOT-OD-15-102). Scientists must take the responsibility to implement this directive. However, in doing so, there is a risk that attention could be restricted to only studies of direct comparison between female/women and male/men. By contrast, understanding how sex influences health and disease needs to take a programmatic approach that includes the study of sex-specific conditions. A programmatic approach will assure the advancement of knowledge to improve women's health.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949986229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949986229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jwh.2015.5498

DO - 10.1089/jwh.2015.5498

M3 - Article

C2 - 26325362

AN - SCOPUS:84949986229

VL - 24

SP - 969

EP - 971

JO - Journal of women's health (2002)

JF - Journal of women's health (2002)

SN - 1540-9996

IS - 12

ER -