Sex differences in ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch block

M. R. Allen, Raymond J Gibbons, A. R. Zinsmeister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Left ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch block is variable and depends on the population under study. This study assessed the implications of right bundle branch block for the estimation of resting left ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch and suspected coronary artery disease. Methods and Results: Seventy- four patients with right bundle branch block, symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease, and no electrocardiographic Q waves were compared with 649 patients with entirely normal electrocardiograms to assess the implications of right bundle branch block on resting left ventricular function. Resting ejection fraction was determined by radionuclide ventriculography. Patients with right bundle branch block were older (mean 65.0 ± 10.2 years vs 53.8 ± 11.1; P< .001) and had a lower mean ejection fraction (60% ± 11% vs 63% ± 9%; P < .005) compared with patients with normal electrocardiograms. There was a highly significant interaction between right bundle branch block and sex with respect to resting ejection fraction (P < .001). The mean ejection fraction for men with right bundle branch block was 57% ± 10% (17% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) compared with 62% ± 8% (7% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) for normal men. In contrast, the mean ejection fraction for women with right bundle branch block was 68% ± 9% (0% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) compared with 65% ± 9% (5% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) for normal women. Conclusions: Male patients with right bundle branch block and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease have a lower resting ejection fraction than male patients with normal electrocardiograms. This difference is not seen in female patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)418-424
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Heart Journal
Volume136
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Bundle-Branch Block
Ventricular Function
Patient Rights
Sex Characteristics
Left Ventricular Function
Coronary Artery Disease
Electrocardiography
Radionuclide Ventriculography
Women's Rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Sex differences in ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch block. / Allen, M. R.; Gibbons, Raymond J; Zinsmeister, A. R.

In: American Heart Journal, Vol. 136, No. 3, 1998, p. 418-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{993982d9cacf4e6db2b576c68393c47f,
title = "Sex differences in ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch block",
abstract = "Background: Left ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch block is variable and depends on the population under study. This study assessed the implications of right bundle branch block for the estimation of resting left ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch and suspected coronary artery disease. Methods and Results: Seventy- four patients with right bundle branch block, symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease, and no electrocardiographic Q waves were compared with 649 patients with entirely normal electrocardiograms to assess the implications of right bundle branch block on resting left ventricular function. Resting ejection fraction was determined by radionuclide ventriculography. Patients with right bundle branch block were older (mean 65.0 ± 10.2 years vs 53.8 ± 11.1; P< .001) and had a lower mean ejection fraction (60{\%} ± 11{\%} vs 63{\%} ± 9{\%}; P < .005) compared with patients with normal electrocardiograms. There was a highly significant interaction between right bundle branch block and sex with respect to resting ejection fraction (P < .001). The mean ejection fraction for men with right bundle branch block was 57{\%} ± 10{\%} (17{\%} with abnormal resting ejection fraction) compared with 62{\%} ± 8{\%} (7{\%} with abnormal resting ejection fraction) for normal men. In contrast, the mean ejection fraction for women with right bundle branch block was 68{\%} ± 9{\%} (0{\%} with abnormal resting ejection fraction) compared with 65{\%} ± 9{\%} (5{\%} with abnormal resting ejection fraction) for normal women. Conclusions: Male patients with right bundle branch block and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease have a lower resting ejection fraction than male patients with normal electrocardiograms. This difference is not seen in female patients.",
author = "Allen, {M. R.} and Gibbons, {Raymond J} and Zinsmeister, {A. R.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70215-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "418--424",
journal = "American Heart Journal",
issn = "0002-8703",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch block

AU - Allen, M. R.

AU - Gibbons, Raymond J

AU - Zinsmeister, A. R.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Background: Left ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch block is variable and depends on the population under study. This study assessed the implications of right bundle branch block for the estimation of resting left ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch and suspected coronary artery disease. Methods and Results: Seventy- four patients with right bundle branch block, symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease, and no electrocardiographic Q waves were compared with 649 patients with entirely normal electrocardiograms to assess the implications of right bundle branch block on resting left ventricular function. Resting ejection fraction was determined by radionuclide ventriculography. Patients with right bundle branch block were older (mean 65.0 ± 10.2 years vs 53.8 ± 11.1; P< .001) and had a lower mean ejection fraction (60% ± 11% vs 63% ± 9%; P < .005) compared with patients with normal electrocardiograms. There was a highly significant interaction between right bundle branch block and sex with respect to resting ejection fraction (P < .001). The mean ejection fraction for men with right bundle branch block was 57% ± 10% (17% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) compared with 62% ± 8% (7% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) for normal men. In contrast, the mean ejection fraction for women with right bundle branch block was 68% ± 9% (0% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) compared with 65% ± 9% (5% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) for normal women. Conclusions: Male patients with right bundle branch block and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease have a lower resting ejection fraction than male patients with normal electrocardiograms. This difference is not seen in female patients.

AB - Background: Left ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch block is variable and depends on the population under study. This study assessed the implications of right bundle branch block for the estimation of resting left ventricular function in patients with right bundle branch and suspected coronary artery disease. Methods and Results: Seventy- four patients with right bundle branch block, symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease, and no electrocardiographic Q waves were compared with 649 patients with entirely normal electrocardiograms to assess the implications of right bundle branch block on resting left ventricular function. Resting ejection fraction was determined by radionuclide ventriculography. Patients with right bundle branch block were older (mean 65.0 ± 10.2 years vs 53.8 ± 11.1; P< .001) and had a lower mean ejection fraction (60% ± 11% vs 63% ± 9%; P < .005) compared with patients with normal electrocardiograms. There was a highly significant interaction between right bundle branch block and sex with respect to resting ejection fraction (P < .001). The mean ejection fraction for men with right bundle branch block was 57% ± 10% (17% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) compared with 62% ± 8% (7% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) for normal men. In contrast, the mean ejection fraction for women with right bundle branch block was 68% ± 9% (0% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) compared with 65% ± 9% (5% with abnormal resting ejection fraction) for normal women. Conclusions: Male patients with right bundle branch block and symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease have a lower resting ejection fraction than male patients with normal electrocardiograms. This difference is not seen in female patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031718695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031718695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70215-7

DO - 10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70215-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 9736132

AN - SCOPUS:0031718695

VL - 136

SP - 418

EP - 424

JO - American Heart Journal

JF - American Heart Journal

SN - 0002-8703

IS - 3

ER -