Sequential assessment of exercise tolerance in heart transplantation compared with coronary artery bypass surgery after phase II cardiac rehabilitation

Hiroyuki Daida, Ray W. Squires, Thomas G. Allison, Bruce David Johnson, Gerald T. Gau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To investigate the improvement in exercise capacity of transplant patients after an early postoperative (phase II) cardiac rehabilitation program during the first year after surgery, we analyzed retrospectively exercise capacity within 3 months (at the completion of phase II rehabilitation) and i year after surgery in 17 orthotopic heart transplantation patients (15 men and 2 women) and 17 age- and gender-matched coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. All patients participated in a phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise program followed by a home-based exercise program. At the completion of phase II cardiac rehabilitation, mean peak oxygen (V̇O2) adjusted for body weight in heart transplant patients was not significantly different from that in CABG patients (19.7 ± 3.7 vs 21.9 ± 4.1 ml/kg/min), and oxygen pulse at peak exercise did not differ between the 2 groups (11.5 ± 2.5 vs 12.6 ± 2.4 ml/beat). Between 3 months and 1 year after surgery, CABG patients had a marked increase in exercise time, increase in heart rate from rest to peak exercise (heart rate reserve), peak V̇O2, and oxygen pulse. In contrast, heart transplant patients had a significant but only modest increase in peak V̇O2, and were much more limited in exercise capacity at 1 year than were CABG patients (21.3 ± 3.9 vs 27.4 ± 4.7 ml/kg/min, p < 0.0001). In our limited patient population, usual phase II rehabilitation with subsequent home-based exercise training was inadequate to improve the exercise capacity of heart transplant patients, and different rehabilitation protocols, such as long-term supervised exercise training, specific to this patient group may be indicated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)696-700
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume77
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 1996

Fingerprint

Exercise Tolerance
Heart Transplantation
Coronary Artery Bypass
Exercise
Transplants
Rehabilitation
Oxygen
Cardiac Rehabilitation
Heart Rate
Exercise Therapy
Body Weight

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Sequential assessment of exercise tolerance in heart transplantation compared with coronary artery bypass surgery after phase II cardiac rehabilitation. / Daida, Hiroyuki; Squires, Ray W.; Allison, Thomas G.; Johnson, Bruce David; Gau, Gerald T.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 77, No. 9, 01.04.1996, p. 696-700.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{001cdfd91251459f95b09ba75683768a,
title = "Sequential assessment of exercise tolerance in heart transplantation compared with coronary artery bypass surgery after phase II cardiac rehabilitation",
abstract = "To investigate the improvement in exercise capacity of transplant patients after an early postoperative (phase II) cardiac rehabilitation program during the first year after surgery, we analyzed retrospectively exercise capacity within 3 months (at the completion of phase II rehabilitation) and i year after surgery in 17 orthotopic heart transplantation patients (15 men and 2 women) and 17 age- and gender-matched coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. All patients participated in a phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise program followed by a home-based exercise program. At the completion of phase II cardiac rehabilitation, mean peak oxygen (V̇O2) adjusted for body weight in heart transplant patients was not significantly different from that in CABG patients (19.7 ± 3.7 vs 21.9 ± 4.1 ml/kg/min), and oxygen pulse at peak exercise did not differ between the 2 groups (11.5 ± 2.5 vs 12.6 ± 2.4 ml/beat). Between 3 months and 1 year after surgery, CABG patients had a marked increase in exercise time, increase in heart rate from rest to peak exercise (heart rate reserve), peak V̇O2, and oxygen pulse. In contrast, heart transplant patients had a significant but only modest increase in peak V̇O2, and were much more limited in exercise capacity at 1 year than were CABG patients (21.3 ± 3.9 vs 27.4 ± 4.7 ml/kg/min, p < 0.0001). In our limited patient population, usual phase II rehabilitation with subsequent home-based exercise training was inadequate to improve the exercise capacity of heart transplant patients, and different rehabilitation protocols, such as long-term supervised exercise training, specific to this patient group may be indicated.",
author = "Hiroyuki Daida and Squires, {Ray W.} and Allison, {Thomas G.} and Johnson, {Bruce David} and Gau, {Gerald T.}",
year = "1996",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89202-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "696--700",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sequential assessment of exercise tolerance in heart transplantation compared with coronary artery bypass surgery after phase II cardiac rehabilitation

AU - Daida, Hiroyuki

AU - Squires, Ray W.

AU - Allison, Thomas G.

AU - Johnson, Bruce David

AU - Gau, Gerald T.

PY - 1996/4/1

Y1 - 1996/4/1

N2 - To investigate the improvement in exercise capacity of transplant patients after an early postoperative (phase II) cardiac rehabilitation program during the first year after surgery, we analyzed retrospectively exercise capacity within 3 months (at the completion of phase II rehabilitation) and i year after surgery in 17 orthotopic heart transplantation patients (15 men and 2 women) and 17 age- and gender-matched coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. All patients participated in a phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise program followed by a home-based exercise program. At the completion of phase II cardiac rehabilitation, mean peak oxygen (V̇O2) adjusted for body weight in heart transplant patients was not significantly different from that in CABG patients (19.7 ± 3.7 vs 21.9 ± 4.1 ml/kg/min), and oxygen pulse at peak exercise did not differ between the 2 groups (11.5 ± 2.5 vs 12.6 ± 2.4 ml/beat). Between 3 months and 1 year after surgery, CABG patients had a marked increase in exercise time, increase in heart rate from rest to peak exercise (heart rate reserve), peak V̇O2, and oxygen pulse. In contrast, heart transplant patients had a significant but only modest increase in peak V̇O2, and were much more limited in exercise capacity at 1 year than were CABG patients (21.3 ± 3.9 vs 27.4 ± 4.7 ml/kg/min, p < 0.0001). In our limited patient population, usual phase II rehabilitation with subsequent home-based exercise training was inadequate to improve the exercise capacity of heart transplant patients, and different rehabilitation protocols, such as long-term supervised exercise training, specific to this patient group may be indicated.

AB - To investigate the improvement in exercise capacity of transplant patients after an early postoperative (phase II) cardiac rehabilitation program during the first year after surgery, we analyzed retrospectively exercise capacity within 3 months (at the completion of phase II rehabilitation) and i year after surgery in 17 orthotopic heart transplantation patients (15 men and 2 women) and 17 age- and gender-matched coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. All patients participated in a phase II cardiac rehabilitation exercise program followed by a home-based exercise program. At the completion of phase II cardiac rehabilitation, mean peak oxygen (V̇O2) adjusted for body weight in heart transplant patients was not significantly different from that in CABG patients (19.7 ± 3.7 vs 21.9 ± 4.1 ml/kg/min), and oxygen pulse at peak exercise did not differ between the 2 groups (11.5 ± 2.5 vs 12.6 ± 2.4 ml/beat). Between 3 months and 1 year after surgery, CABG patients had a marked increase in exercise time, increase in heart rate from rest to peak exercise (heart rate reserve), peak V̇O2, and oxygen pulse. In contrast, heart transplant patients had a significant but only modest increase in peak V̇O2, and were much more limited in exercise capacity at 1 year than were CABG patients (21.3 ± 3.9 vs 27.4 ± 4.7 ml/kg/min, p < 0.0001). In our limited patient population, usual phase II rehabilitation with subsequent home-based exercise training was inadequate to improve the exercise capacity of heart transplant patients, and different rehabilitation protocols, such as long-term supervised exercise training, specific to this patient group may be indicated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029919071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029919071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89202-8

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89202-8

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 696

EP - 700

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 9

ER -