Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training

A systematic review and meta-analysis

Ryan Brydges, Julian Manzone, David Shanks, Rose Hatala, Stanley J. Hamstra, Benjamin Zendejas, David Allan Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Self-regulated learning (SRL) requires an active learner who has developed a set of processes for managing the achievement of learning goals. Simulation-based training is one context in which trainees can safely practise learning how to learn. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate, in the simulation-based training context, the effectiveness of interventions designed to support trainees in SRL activities. We used the social-cognitive model of SRL to guide a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the links between instructor supervision, supports or scaffolds for SRL, and educational outcomes. Methods: We searched databases including MEDLINE and Scopus, and previous reviews, for material published until December 2011. Studies comparing simulation-based SRL interventions with another intervention for teaching health professionals were included. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to extract information on learners, study quality and educational outcomes. We used random-effects meta-analysis to compare the effects of supervision (instructor present or absent) and SRL educational supports (e.g. goal-setting study guides present or absent). Results: From 11 064 articles, we included 32 studies enrolling 2482 trainees. Only eight of the 32 studies included educational supports for SRL. Compared with instructor-supervised interventions, unsupervised interventions were associated with poorer immediate post-test outcomes (pooled effect size: -0.34, p = 0.09; n = 19 studies) and negligible effects on delayed (i.e. > 1 week) retention tests (pooled effect size: 0.11, p = 0.63; n = 8 studies). Interventions including SRL supports were associated with small benefits compared with interventions without supports on both immediate post-tests (pooled effect size: 0.23, p = 0.22; n = 5 studies) and delayed retention tests (pooled effect size: 0.44, p = 0.067; n = 3 studies). Conclusions: Few studies in the simulation literature have designed SRL training to explicitly support trainees' capacity to self-regulate their learning. We recommend that educators and researchers shift from thinking about SRL as learning alone to thinking of SRL as comprising a shared responsibility between the trainee and the instructional designer (i.e. learning using designed supports that help prepare individuals for future learning).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-378
Number of pages11
JournalMedical Education
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Learning
simulation
learning
trainee
instructor
Simulation Training
supervision
Problem-Based Learning
present
MEDLINE
health professionals
Teaching
Research Personnel
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Brydges, R., Manzone, J., Shanks, D., Hatala, R., Hamstra, S. J., Zendejas, B., & Cook, D. A. (2015). Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education, 49(4), 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12649

Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Brydges, Ryan; Manzone, Julian; Shanks, David; Hatala, Rose; Hamstra, Stanley J.; Zendejas, Benjamin; Cook, David Allan.

In: Medical Education, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 368-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brydges, R, Manzone, J, Shanks, D, Hatala, R, Hamstra, SJ, Zendejas, B & Cook, DA 2015, 'Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training: A systematic review and meta-analysis', Medical Education, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12649
Brydges R, Manzone J, Shanks D, Hatala R, Hamstra SJ, Zendejas B et al. Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education. 2015 Apr 1;49(4):368-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12649
Brydges, Ryan ; Manzone, Julian ; Shanks, David ; Hatala, Rose ; Hamstra, Stanley J. ; Zendejas, Benjamin ; Cook, David Allan. / Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training : A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: Medical Education. 2015 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 368-378.
@article{ac12d29c88f146eabebc8bbf0a64016d,
title = "Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Context: Self-regulated learning (SRL) requires an active learner who has developed a set of processes for managing the achievement of learning goals. Simulation-based training is one context in which trainees can safely practise learning how to learn. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate, in the simulation-based training context, the effectiveness of interventions designed to support trainees in SRL activities. We used the social-cognitive model of SRL to guide a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the links between instructor supervision, supports or scaffolds for SRL, and educational outcomes. Methods: We searched databases including MEDLINE and Scopus, and previous reviews, for material published until December 2011. Studies comparing simulation-based SRL interventions with another intervention for teaching health professionals were included. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to extract information on learners, study quality and educational outcomes. We used random-effects meta-analysis to compare the effects of supervision (instructor present or absent) and SRL educational supports (e.g. goal-setting study guides present or absent). Results: From 11 064 articles, we included 32 studies enrolling 2482 trainees. Only eight of the 32 studies included educational supports for SRL. Compared with instructor-supervised interventions, unsupervised interventions were associated with poorer immediate post-test outcomes (pooled effect size: -0.34, p = 0.09; n = 19 studies) and negligible effects on delayed (i.e. > 1 week) retention tests (pooled effect size: 0.11, p = 0.63; n = 8 studies). Interventions including SRL supports were associated with small benefits compared with interventions without supports on both immediate post-tests (pooled effect size: 0.23, p = 0.22; n = 5 studies) and delayed retention tests (pooled effect size: 0.44, p = 0.067; n = 3 studies). Conclusions: Few studies in the simulation literature have designed SRL training to explicitly support trainees' capacity to self-regulate their learning. We recommend that educators and researchers shift from thinking about SRL as learning alone to thinking of SRL as comprising a shared responsibility between the trainee and the instructional designer (i.e. learning using designed supports that help prepare individuals for future learning).",
author = "Ryan Brydges and Julian Manzone and David Shanks and Rose Hatala and Hamstra, {Stanley J.} and Benjamin Zendejas and Cook, {David Allan}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/medu.12649",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "368--378",
journal = "Medical Education",
issn = "0308-0110",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-regulated learning in simulation-based training

T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Brydges, Ryan

AU - Manzone, Julian

AU - Shanks, David

AU - Hatala, Rose

AU - Hamstra, Stanley J.

AU - Zendejas, Benjamin

AU - Cook, David Allan

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Context: Self-regulated learning (SRL) requires an active learner who has developed a set of processes for managing the achievement of learning goals. Simulation-based training is one context in which trainees can safely practise learning how to learn. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate, in the simulation-based training context, the effectiveness of interventions designed to support trainees in SRL activities. We used the social-cognitive model of SRL to guide a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the links between instructor supervision, supports or scaffolds for SRL, and educational outcomes. Methods: We searched databases including MEDLINE and Scopus, and previous reviews, for material published until December 2011. Studies comparing simulation-based SRL interventions with another intervention for teaching health professionals were included. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to extract information on learners, study quality and educational outcomes. We used random-effects meta-analysis to compare the effects of supervision (instructor present or absent) and SRL educational supports (e.g. goal-setting study guides present or absent). Results: From 11 064 articles, we included 32 studies enrolling 2482 trainees. Only eight of the 32 studies included educational supports for SRL. Compared with instructor-supervised interventions, unsupervised interventions were associated with poorer immediate post-test outcomes (pooled effect size: -0.34, p = 0.09; n = 19 studies) and negligible effects on delayed (i.e. > 1 week) retention tests (pooled effect size: 0.11, p = 0.63; n = 8 studies). Interventions including SRL supports were associated with small benefits compared with interventions without supports on both immediate post-tests (pooled effect size: 0.23, p = 0.22; n = 5 studies) and delayed retention tests (pooled effect size: 0.44, p = 0.067; n = 3 studies). Conclusions: Few studies in the simulation literature have designed SRL training to explicitly support trainees' capacity to self-regulate their learning. We recommend that educators and researchers shift from thinking about SRL as learning alone to thinking of SRL as comprising a shared responsibility between the trainee and the instructional designer (i.e. learning using designed supports that help prepare individuals for future learning).

AB - Context: Self-regulated learning (SRL) requires an active learner who has developed a set of processes for managing the achievement of learning goals. Simulation-based training is one context in which trainees can safely practise learning how to learn. Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate, in the simulation-based training context, the effectiveness of interventions designed to support trainees in SRL activities. We used the social-cognitive model of SRL to guide a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the links between instructor supervision, supports or scaffolds for SRL, and educational outcomes. Methods: We searched databases including MEDLINE and Scopus, and previous reviews, for material published until December 2011. Studies comparing simulation-based SRL interventions with another intervention for teaching health professionals were included. Reviewers worked independently and in duplicate to extract information on learners, study quality and educational outcomes. We used random-effects meta-analysis to compare the effects of supervision (instructor present or absent) and SRL educational supports (e.g. goal-setting study guides present or absent). Results: From 11 064 articles, we included 32 studies enrolling 2482 trainees. Only eight of the 32 studies included educational supports for SRL. Compared with instructor-supervised interventions, unsupervised interventions were associated with poorer immediate post-test outcomes (pooled effect size: -0.34, p = 0.09; n = 19 studies) and negligible effects on delayed (i.e. > 1 week) retention tests (pooled effect size: 0.11, p = 0.63; n = 8 studies). Interventions including SRL supports were associated with small benefits compared with interventions without supports on both immediate post-tests (pooled effect size: 0.23, p = 0.22; n = 5 studies) and delayed retention tests (pooled effect size: 0.44, p = 0.067; n = 3 studies). Conclusions: Few studies in the simulation literature have designed SRL training to explicitly support trainees' capacity to self-regulate their learning. We recommend that educators and researchers shift from thinking about SRL as learning alone to thinking of SRL as comprising a shared responsibility between the trainee and the instructional designer (i.e. learning using designed supports that help prepare individuals for future learning).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924977686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924977686&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/medu.12649

DO - 10.1111/medu.12649

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 368

EP - 378

JO - Medical Education

JF - Medical Education

SN - 0308-0110

IS - 4

ER -