Selection of endocrinology subspecialty trainees: Which applicant characteristics are associated with performance during fellowship training?

Neena Natt, Alice Y Chang, Elie F. Berbari, Kurt A. Kennel, Ann E. Kearns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine which residency characteristics are associated with performance during endocrinology fellowship training as measured by competency-based faculty evaluation scores and faculty global ratings of trainee performance. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of interview applications from endocrinology fellows who graduated from a single academic institution between 2006 and 2013. Performance measures included competency-based faculty evaluation scores and faculty global ratings. The association between applicant characteristics and measures of performance during fellowship was examined by linear regression. Results: The presence of a laudatory comparative statement in the residency program director's letter of recommendation (LoR) or experience as a chief resident was significantly associated with competency-based faculty evaluation scores (β = 0.22, P = .001; and β = 0.24, P = .009, respectively) and faculty global ratings (β = 0.85, P = .006; and β = 0.96, P = .015, respectively). Conclusion: The presence of a laudatory comparative statement in the residency program director's LoR or experience as a chief resident were significantly associated with overall performance during subspecialty fellowship training. Future studies are needed in other cohorts to determine the broader implications of these findings in the application and selection process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-50
Number of pages6
JournalEndocrine Practice
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Endocrinology
Internship and Residency
Linear Models
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Endocrinology

Cite this

Selection of endocrinology subspecialty trainees : Which applicant characteristics are associated with performance during fellowship training? / Natt, Neena; Chang, Alice Y; Berbari, Elie F.; Kennel, Kurt A.; Kearns, Ann E.

In: Endocrine Practice, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 45-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7f5c9f5eeab141eea6b781e8d4030463,
title = "Selection of endocrinology subspecialty trainees: Which applicant characteristics are associated with performance during fellowship training?",
abstract = "Objective: To determine which residency characteristics are associated with performance during endocrinology fellowship training as measured by competency-based faculty evaluation scores and faculty global ratings of trainee performance. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of interview applications from endocrinology fellows who graduated from a single academic institution between 2006 and 2013. Performance measures included competency-based faculty evaluation scores and faculty global ratings. The association between applicant characteristics and measures of performance during fellowship was examined by linear regression. Results: The presence of a laudatory comparative statement in the residency program director's letter of recommendation (LoR) or experience as a chief resident was significantly associated with competency-based faculty evaluation scores (β = 0.22, P = .001; and β = 0.24, P = .009, respectively) and faculty global ratings (β = 0.85, P = .006; and β = 0.96, P = .015, respectively). Conclusion: The presence of a laudatory comparative statement in the residency program director's LoR or experience as a chief resident were significantly associated with overall performance during subspecialty fellowship training. Future studies are needed in other cohorts to determine the broader implications of these findings in the application and selection process.",
author = "Neena Natt and Chang, {Alice Y} and Berbari, {Elie F.} and Kennel, {Kurt A.} and Kearns, {Ann E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4158/EP15808.OR",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "45--50",
journal = "Endocrine Practice",
issn = "1530-891X",
publisher = "American Association of Clinical Endocrinology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection of endocrinology subspecialty trainees

T2 - Which applicant characteristics are associated with performance during fellowship training?

AU - Natt, Neena

AU - Chang, Alice Y

AU - Berbari, Elie F.

AU - Kennel, Kurt A.

AU - Kearns, Ann E.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objective: To determine which residency characteristics are associated with performance during endocrinology fellowship training as measured by competency-based faculty evaluation scores and faculty global ratings of trainee performance. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of interview applications from endocrinology fellows who graduated from a single academic institution between 2006 and 2013. Performance measures included competency-based faculty evaluation scores and faculty global ratings. The association between applicant characteristics and measures of performance during fellowship was examined by linear regression. Results: The presence of a laudatory comparative statement in the residency program director's letter of recommendation (LoR) or experience as a chief resident was significantly associated with competency-based faculty evaluation scores (β = 0.22, P = .001; and β = 0.24, P = .009, respectively) and faculty global ratings (β = 0.85, P = .006; and β = 0.96, P = .015, respectively). Conclusion: The presence of a laudatory comparative statement in the residency program director's LoR or experience as a chief resident were significantly associated with overall performance during subspecialty fellowship training. Future studies are needed in other cohorts to determine the broader implications of these findings in the application and selection process.

AB - Objective: To determine which residency characteristics are associated with performance during endocrinology fellowship training as measured by competency-based faculty evaluation scores and faculty global ratings of trainee performance. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of interview applications from endocrinology fellows who graduated from a single academic institution between 2006 and 2013. Performance measures included competency-based faculty evaluation scores and faculty global ratings. The association between applicant characteristics and measures of performance during fellowship was examined by linear regression. Results: The presence of a laudatory comparative statement in the residency program director's letter of recommendation (LoR) or experience as a chief resident was significantly associated with competency-based faculty evaluation scores (β = 0.22, P = .001; and β = 0.24, P = .009, respectively) and faculty global ratings (β = 0.85, P = .006; and β = 0.96, P = .015, respectively). Conclusion: The presence of a laudatory comparative statement in the residency program director's LoR or experience as a chief resident were significantly associated with overall performance during subspecialty fellowship training. Future studies are needed in other cohorts to determine the broader implications of these findings in the application and selection process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021858090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021858090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4158/EP15808.OR

DO - 10.4158/EP15808.OR

M3 - Article

C2 - 26437219

AN - SCOPUS:85021858090

VL - 22

SP - 45

EP - 50

JO - Endocrine Practice

JF - Endocrine Practice

SN - 1530-891X

IS - 1

ER -