Segregation analysis of breast cancer: A comparison of type-dependent age-at-onset versus type-dependent susceptibility models

David J. Ciske, Stephen S. Rich, Richard A. King, V. Elving Anderson, Sue Bartow, Celine M Vachon, Paul G. McGovern, Larry H. Kushi, Wei Zheng, Thomas A. Sellers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most segregation analyses of breast cancer susceptibility have modeled the effect of the major gene on the age-at-onset distribution. However, in families linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2, there is wide variation in the age-at- onset among gene carriers. We performed a segregation analysis of 544 Minnesota breast cancer families using models which parameterized the putative major gene effect in two ways: earlier age-at-onset, with a common level of susceptibility (model I), and greater susceptibility, with a common mean age-at-onset (model II). Five hypothetical modes of transmission and an unrestricted general hypothesis were fitted to the data. Twice the difference between the log(e) likelihood for the data under the specified hypothesis (recessive, no major gene, etc.) and the log(e) likelihood under the general hypothesis is distributed asymptotically as a chi-square statistic with the degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of parameters estimated. This difference was compared to the critical value for the chi- square distribution to assess goodness-of-fit. Under model I, both Mendelian and non-Mendelian hypotheses were rejected. When model II was used, the non- Mendelian hypotheses were rejected whereas all Mendelian hypotheses were not. Mendelian recessive inheritance of a common allele (q(A) = 0.11) with a high penetrance (87%) provided the best fit to the data. We then stratified the families into two subsets based on the age at diagnosis of the proband [≤55 years (n = 265) versus >55 years (n = 279)]; there was no evidence of heterogeneity under either model (I or II). These data suggest that, in some breast cancer families, the effect of the putative susceptibility gene is better represented as increasing overall susceptibility to breast cancer rather than as a shift in the age-at-onset distribution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)317-328
Number of pages12
JournalGenetic Epidemiology
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Age of Onset
Breast Neoplasms
Genes
Penetrance
Chi-Square Distribution
Alleles

Keywords

  • age-at-onset
  • families
  • models
  • segregation analysis
  • susceptibility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Segregation analysis of breast cancer : A comparison of type-dependent age-at-onset versus type-dependent susceptibility models. / Ciske, David J.; Rich, Stephen S.; King, Richard A.; Anderson, V. Elving; Bartow, Sue; Vachon, Celine M; McGovern, Paul G.; Kushi, Larry H.; Zheng, Wei; Sellers, Thomas A.

In: Genetic Epidemiology, Vol. 13, No. 4, 1996, p. 317-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ciske, David J. ; Rich, Stephen S. ; King, Richard A. ; Anderson, V. Elving ; Bartow, Sue ; Vachon, Celine M ; McGovern, Paul G. ; Kushi, Larry H. ; Zheng, Wei ; Sellers, Thomas A. / Segregation analysis of breast cancer : A comparison of type-dependent age-at-onset versus type-dependent susceptibility models. In: Genetic Epidemiology. 1996 ; Vol. 13, No. 4. pp. 317-328.
@article{7d898c63c6514032a12038e7b50c431a,
title = "Segregation analysis of breast cancer: A comparison of type-dependent age-at-onset versus type-dependent susceptibility models",
abstract = "Most segregation analyses of breast cancer susceptibility have modeled the effect of the major gene on the age-at-onset distribution. However, in families linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2, there is wide variation in the age-at- onset among gene carriers. We performed a segregation analysis of 544 Minnesota breast cancer families using models which parameterized the putative major gene effect in two ways: earlier age-at-onset, with a common level of susceptibility (model I), and greater susceptibility, with a common mean age-at-onset (model II). Five hypothetical modes of transmission and an unrestricted general hypothesis were fitted to the data. Twice the difference between the log(e) likelihood for the data under the specified hypothesis (recessive, no major gene, etc.) and the log(e) likelihood under the general hypothesis is distributed asymptotically as a chi-square statistic with the degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of parameters estimated. This difference was compared to the critical value for the chi- square distribution to assess goodness-of-fit. Under model I, both Mendelian and non-Mendelian hypotheses were rejected. When model II was used, the non- Mendelian hypotheses were rejected whereas all Mendelian hypotheses were not. Mendelian recessive inheritance of a common allele (q(A) = 0.11) with a high penetrance (87{\%}) provided the best fit to the data. We then stratified the families into two subsets based on the age at diagnosis of the proband [≤55 years (n = 265) versus >55 years (n = 279)]; there was no evidence of heterogeneity under either model (I or II). These data suggest that, in some breast cancer families, the effect of the putative susceptibility gene is better represented as increasing overall susceptibility to breast cancer rather than as a shift in the age-at-onset distribution.",
keywords = "age-at-onset, families, models, segregation analysis, susceptibility",
author = "Ciske, {David J.} and Rich, {Stephen S.} and King, {Richard A.} and Anderson, {V. Elving} and Sue Bartow and Vachon, {Celine M} and McGovern, {Paul G.} and Kushi, {Larry H.} and Wei Zheng and Sellers, {Thomas A.}",
year = "1996",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4<317::AID-GEPI1>3.0.CO;2-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "317--328",
journal = "Genetic Epidemiology",
issn = "0741-0395",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Segregation analysis of breast cancer

T2 - A comparison of type-dependent age-at-onset versus type-dependent susceptibility models

AU - Ciske, David J.

AU - Rich, Stephen S.

AU - King, Richard A.

AU - Anderson, V. Elving

AU - Bartow, Sue

AU - Vachon, Celine M

AU - McGovern, Paul G.

AU - Kushi, Larry H.

AU - Zheng, Wei

AU - Sellers, Thomas A.

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - Most segregation analyses of breast cancer susceptibility have modeled the effect of the major gene on the age-at-onset distribution. However, in families linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2, there is wide variation in the age-at- onset among gene carriers. We performed a segregation analysis of 544 Minnesota breast cancer families using models which parameterized the putative major gene effect in two ways: earlier age-at-onset, with a common level of susceptibility (model I), and greater susceptibility, with a common mean age-at-onset (model II). Five hypothetical modes of transmission and an unrestricted general hypothesis were fitted to the data. Twice the difference between the log(e) likelihood for the data under the specified hypothesis (recessive, no major gene, etc.) and the log(e) likelihood under the general hypothesis is distributed asymptotically as a chi-square statistic with the degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of parameters estimated. This difference was compared to the critical value for the chi- square distribution to assess goodness-of-fit. Under model I, both Mendelian and non-Mendelian hypotheses were rejected. When model II was used, the non- Mendelian hypotheses were rejected whereas all Mendelian hypotheses were not. Mendelian recessive inheritance of a common allele (q(A) = 0.11) with a high penetrance (87%) provided the best fit to the data. We then stratified the families into two subsets based on the age at diagnosis of the proband [≤55 years (n = 265) versus >55 years (n = 279)]; there was no evidence of heterogeneity under either model (I or II). These data suggest that, in some breast cancer families, the effect of the putative susceptibility gene is better represented as increasing overall susceptibility to breast cancer rather than as a shift in the age-at-onset distribution.

AB - Most segregation analyses of breast cancer susceptibility have modeled the effect of the major gene on the age-at-onset distribution. However, in families linked to BRCA1 or BRCA2, there is wide variation in the age-at- onset among gene carriers. We performed a segregation analysis of 544 Minnesota breast cancer families using models which parameterized the putative major gene effect in two ways: earlier age-at-onset, with a common level of susceptibility (model I), and greater susceptibility, with a common mean age-at-onset (model II). Five hypothetical modes of transmission and an unrestricted general hypothesis were fitted to the data. Twice the difference between the log(e) likelihood for the data under the specified hypothesis (recessive, no major gene, etc.) and the log(e) likelihood under the general hypothesis is distributed asymptotically as a chi-square statistic with the degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of parameters estimated. This difference was compared to the critical value for the chi- square distribution to assess goodness-of-fit. Under model I, both Mendelian and non-Mendelian hypotheses were rejected. When model II was used, the non- Mendelian hypotheses were rejected whereas all Mendelian hypotheses were not. Mendelian recessive inheritance of a common allele (q(A) = 0.11) with a high penetrance (87%) provided the best fit to the data. We then stratified the families into two subsets based on the age at diagnosis of the proband [≤55 years (n = 265) versus >55 years (n = 279)]; there was no evidence of heterogeneity under either model (I or II). These data suggest that, in some breast cancer families, the effect of the putative susceptibility gene is better represented as increasing overall susceptibility to breast cancer rather than as a shift in the age-at-onset distribution.

KW - age-at-onset

KW - families

KW - models

KW - segregation analysis

KW - susceptibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10144227101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10144227101&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4<317::AID-GEPI1>3.0.CO;2-1

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(1996)13:4<317::AID-GEPI1>3.0.CO;2-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 8894635

AN - SCOPUS:10144227101

VL - 13

SP - 317

EP - 328

JO - Genetic Epidemiology

JF - Genetic Epidemiology

SN - 0741-0395

IS - 4

ER -