TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening individuals with intracranial aneurysms for abdominal aortic aneurysms is cost-effective based on estimated coprevalence
AU - Ball, Benjamin Z.
AU - Jiang, Boxiang
AU - Mehndiratta, Prachi
AU - Stukenborg, George J.
AU - Upchurch, Gilbert R.
AU - Meschia, James F.
AU - Worrall, Bradford B.
AU - Southerland, Andrew M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Objective Aneurysm rupture is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and evidence suggests shared risk for both abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and intracranial aneurysms (IAs). We hypothesized that screening for AAA in patients with known IA is cost-effective. Methods We used a decision tree model to compare costs and outcomes of AAA screening vs no screening in a hypothetical cohort of patients with IA. We measured expected outcomes using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We performed a Monte Carlo simulation and additional sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of ranging base case variables on model outcomes and identified thresholds where a decision alternative dominated the model (both less expensive and more effective than the alternative). Results In our base case analysis, screening for AAA provided an additional 0.17 QALY (2.5-97.5 percentile: 0.11-0.27 QALY) at a saving of $201 (2.5-97.5 percentile: $−127 to $896). This yielded an ICER of $−1150/QALY (2.5-97.5 percentile: $−4299 to $6374/QALY), that is, screening saves $1150 per QALY gained. Conclusions Based on this model, screening for AAA in individuals with IA is cost-effective at an ICER of $1150/QALY, well below accepted societal thresholds estimated at $60,000/QALY. Cost-effectiveness of cross-screening in these populations is sensitive to aneurysm coprevalence and risk of rupture. Further prospective study is warranted to validate this finding.
AB - Objective Aneurysm rupture is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and evidence suggests shared risk for both abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and intracranial aneurysms (IAs). We hypothesized that screening for AAA in patients with known IA is cost-effective. Methods We used a decision tree model to compare costs and outcomes of AAA screening vs no screening in a hypothetical cohort of patients with IA. We measured expected outcomes using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We performed a Monte Carlo simulation and additional sensitivity analyses to assess the effects of ranging base case variables on model outcomes and identified thresholds where a decision alternative dominated the model (both less expensive and more effective than the alternative). Results In our base case analysis, screening for AAA provided an additional 0.17 QALY (2.5-97.5 percentile: 0.11-0.27 QALY) at a saving of $201 (2.5-97.5 percentile: $−127 to $896). This yielded an ICER of $−1150/QALY (2.5-97.5 percentile: $−4299 to $6374/QALY), that is, screening saves $1150 per QALY gained. Conclusions Based on this model, screening for AAA in individuals with IA is cost-effective at an ICER of $1150/QALY, well below accepted societal thresholds estimated at $60,000/QALY. Cost-effectiveness of cross-screening in these populations is sensitive to aneurysm coprevalence and risk of rupture. Further prospective study is warranted to validate this finding.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990955067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84990955067&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.065
DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.065
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27565600
AN - SCOPUS:84990955067
SN - 0741-5214
VL - 64
SP - 811-818.e3
JO - Journal of vascular surgery
JF - Journal of vascular surgery
IS - 3
ER -