TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific collaboration and team science
T2 - a social network analysis of the centers for population health and health disparities
AU - Okamoto, Janet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Society of Behavioral Medicine.
PY - 2015/3
Y1 - 2015/3
N2 - The past decade has seen dramatic shifts in the way that scientific research is conducted as networks, consortia, and large research centers are funded as transdisciplinary, team-based enterprises to tackle complex scientific questions. Key investigators (N = 167) involved in ten health disparities research centers completed a baseline social network and collaboration readiness survey. Collaborative ties existed primarily between investigators from the same center, with just 7 % of ties occurring across different centers. Grants and work groups were the most common types of ties between investigators, with shared presentations the most common tie across different centers. Transdisciplinary research orientation was associated with network position and reciprocity. Center directors/leaders were significantly more likely to form ties with investigators in other roles, such as statisticians and trainees. Understanding research collaboration networks can help to more effectively design and manage future team-based research, as well as pinpoint potential issues and continuous evaluation of existing efforts.
AB - The past decade has seen dramatic shifts in the way that scientific research is conducted as networks, consortia, and large research centers are funded as transdisciplinary, team-based enterprises to tackle complex scientific questions. Key investigators (N = 167) involved in ten health disparities research centers completed a baseline social network and collaboration readiness survey. Collaborative ties existed primarily between investigators from the same center, with just 7 % of ties occurring across different centers. Grants and work groups were the most common types of ties between investigators, with shared presentations the most common tie across different centers. Transdisciplinary research orientation was associated with network position and reciprocity. Center directors/leaders were significantly more likely to form ties with investigators in other roles, such as statisticians and trainees. Understanding research collaboration networks can help to more effectively design and manage future team-based research, as well as pinpoint potential issues and continuous evaluation of existing efforts.
KW - Collaboration networks
KW - Health disparities
KW - Network analysis
KW - Research collaboration
KW - Scientific collaboration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924045897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924045897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13142-014-0280-1
DO - 10.1007/s13142-014-0280-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84924045897
SN - 1869-6716
VL - 5
SP - 12
EP - 23
JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine
JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine
IS - 1
ER -