Scales, diagnoses, and child psychopathology: II. Comparing the CBCL and the DISC against external validators

Peter S. Jensen, Henry K. Watanabe, John E. Richters, Margaret Roper, Euthymia D. Hibbs, Allan D. Salzberg, Sharon Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using a multimethod multistage screening procedure, the authors interviewed 201 parents and their children with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1). In addition, parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and other survey measures, while their children completed self-report scales. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were done to determine optimal cutpoints on the CBCL, referenced to DISC diagnostic 'caseness.' DISC diagnoses, DISC 'stem' symptoms, CBCL scores, and CBCL ROC-cutpoints were compared against 'external validators,' in order to determine the comparative advantages of each approach for assessing child psychopathology. Overall findings suggest that the controversies about 'best' assessment strategies may be artificial: When both assessment approaches are compared using similar methods, they are reasonably comparable. However, highly specific diagnostic categories may show fewer relationships with external validators and may therefore need more systematic validational studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-168
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 24 1996

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Scales, diagnoses, and child psychopathology: II. Comparing the CBCL and the DISC against external validators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Jensen, P. S., Watanabe, H. K., Richters, J. E., Roper, M., Hibbs, E. D., Salzberg, A. D., & Liu, S. (1996). Scales, diagnoses, and child psychopathology: II. Comparing the CBCL and the DISC against external validators. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24(2), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01441482