Sarcomeric genotyping in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Sara L. Van Driest, Steve R. Ommen, A. Jamil Tajik, Bernard J. Gersh, Michael J. Ackerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

131 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To pool results from studies of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) to elucidate important phenotypic differences among genotypes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data published from November 1998 through November 2004 were gathered and compared from unrelated study population genotyping studies from the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minn), Harvard Medical School (Boston, Mass), France, Germany, Sweden, Finland, and Spain. Standard statistical analysis techniques were used to pool and compare date across genotypes with respect to frequency of mutations, age at diagnosis, and degree of hypertrophy (left ventricular wall thickness). RESULTS: The French study populated harbored the highest frequency of mutations (61%), followed by the Mayo Clinic (38%), Harvard Medical School (36%), and Swedish (30%) study populations. For every study population, mutations in myosin binding protein C (MYBPC3) were the most common cause of HCM. Patients with a family history of MCM had mutations more frequently than those without. This pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in left ventricular wall thickness or in mean age at diagnosis across all genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Differentiation of sarcomeric genotypes, such as MYBPC3-HCM and MYH7-HCM, is not possible on the basis of currently reported phenotypic data. A myriad of genetic and/or environmental modifiers in addition to the primary disease-causing genetic substrate must play an important role in determining a patient's particular phenotype.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)463-469
Number of pages7
JournalMayo Clinic proceedings
Volume80
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sarcomeric genotyping in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this