Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers: A collaborative clinical approach

Barry Anthony Boilson, Anita Wokhlu, Nancy G. Acker, Joel P. Felmlee, Robert E. Watson, Paul R. Julsrud, Paul A. Friedman, Yong Mei Cha, Robert F. Rea, David L. Hayes, Win Kuang Shen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the interactions of pacemakers with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to identify device characteristics that could predict adverse interactions. Background: The safety of MRI in patients with indwelling pacemaker systems remains uncertain. Previous studies demonstrated safety in most patients, but unpredictable, potentially concerning changes in pacemaker behavior have occurred. Methods: We prospectively studied patients with pacemaker devices in situ who were not pacemaker dependent and in whom MRI was essential for adequate diagnosis and treatment. All patients were monitored by electrocardiography and pulse oximetry during scanning; devices were interrogated and cardiac enzymes were measured before and after scanning. Results: Of 32 patients studied (46 MRI examinations), 28 patients had a dual-chamber system and one had a biventricular device. Regions scanned were the head and spine. Devices were reprogrammed to asynchronous pacing or sense-only mode in all except six patients beforeMRI. During six scanning episodes (five patients), "power-on" resetting of the device was noted. Magnet-mode pacing was noted during four episodes (three patients). Occasional premature ventricular contractions were noted in one patient. No significant changes in battery voltage, sensed P wave and R wave, pacing thresholds, lead impedance, or cardiac enzymes were noted immediately after MRI or at 1-month follow-up. Conclusions: Overall, no significant changes were seen in pacemaker device function, and no adverse clinical events were observed. A minority of patients with older devices had unpredictable changes in device behavior, which stresses the need for close monitoring during and careful device interrogation after scanning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-67
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Keywords

  • Arrhythmias
  • Device interactions
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Permanent pacemakers
  • Power-on resetting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with permanent pacemakers: A collaborative clinical approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this