Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach: Implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

Mary Catherine Tolcher, Eleftheria Kalogera, Matthew R. Hopkins, Amy L. Weaver, Juliane Bingener, Sean Christopher Dowdy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach to access the peritoneal cavity and discuss its implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Methods: A retrospective chart review of women undergoing culdotomy for tubal sterilization (N=219) between January 1995 and December 2005 was performed. The Accordion Grading System was used for the severity of complications. Results: No intraoperative complications were noted. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 patients (3.2%): 6 infections (grade 2) and 1 case of hemorrhage (grade 3). Conversion to laparoscopy was necessary in 10 patients (2.2%) due to anatomical constraints or pelvic adhesions; however, culdotomy with entry into the abdominal cavity was nevertheless successful in all 10 cases. The difference in the proportion with a history of pelvic surgery between the conversion and nonconversion groups was not statistically significant (P =.068). Patients with BMI ≥30 had a higher conversion rate compared to patients with BMI < 30 (11.4% versus 1.5%, P =.011). Tubal sterilization via culdotomy was successfully performed in all 11 women with no prior vaginal deliveries. Conclusion: Culdotomy appears to be a safe surgical approach to access the peritoneal cavity and is associated with a low complication rate. These data support the feasibility and safety of utilizing the cul-de-sac as an access portal for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)413-420
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
Safety
Tubal Sterilization
Peritoneal Cavity
Abdominal Cavity
Intraoperative Complications
Laparoscopy
Hemorrhage
Infection

Keywords

  • Culdotomy
  • Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)
  • Transluminal surgery
  • Transvaginal approach/route/ surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach : Implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. / Tolcher, Mary Catherine; Kalogera, Eleftheria; Hopkins, Matthew R.; Weaver, Amy L.; Bingener, Juliane; Dowdy, Sean Christopher.

In: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Vol. 16, No. 3, 07.2012, p. 413-420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tolcher, Mary Catherine ; Kalogera, Eleftheria ; Hopkins, Matthew R. ; Weaver, Amy L. ; Bingener, Juliane ; Dowdy, Sean Christopher. / Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach : Implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. In: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 413-420.
@article{69c968b7ccd241b896cb85fe467b12bd,
title = "Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach: Implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach to access the peritoneal cavity and discuss its implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Methods: A retrospective chart review of women undergoing culdotomy for tubal sterilization (N=219) between January 1995 and December 2005 was performed. The Accordion Grading System was used for the severity of complications. Results: No intraoperative complications were noted. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 patients (3.2{\%}): 6 infections (grade 2) and 1 case of hemorrhage (grade 3). Conversion to laparoscopy was necessary in 10 patients (2.2{\%}) due to anatomical constraints or pelvic adhesions; however, culdotomy with entry into the abdominal cavity was nevertheless successful in all 10 cases. The difference in the proportion with a history of pelvic surgery between the conversion and nonconversion groups was not statistically significant (P =.068). Patients with BMI ≥30 had a higher conversion rate compared to patients with BMI < 30 (11.4{\%} versus 1.5{\%}, P =.011). Tubal sterilization via culdotomy was successfully performed in all 11 women with no prior vaginal deliveries. Conclusion: Culdotomy appears to be a safe surgical approach to access the peritoneal cavity and is associated with a low complication rate. These data support the feasibility and safety of utilizing the cul-de-sac as an access portal for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.",
keywords = "Culdotomy, Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), Transluminal surgery, Transvaginal approach/route/ surgery",
author = "Tolcher, {Mary Catherine} and Eleftheria Kalogera and Hopkins, {Matthew R.} and Weaver, {Amy L.} and Juliane Bingener and Dowdy, {Sean Christopher}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.4293/108680812X13462882735854",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "413--420",
journal = "Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
issn = "1086-8089",
publisher = "Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach

T2 - Implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery

AU - Tolcher, Mary Catherine

AU - Kalogera, Eleftheria

AU - Hopkins, Matthew R.

AU - Weaver, Amy L.

AU - Bingener, Juliane

AU - Dowdy, Sean Christopher

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach to access the peritoneal cavity and discuss its implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Methods: A retrospective chart review of women undergoing culdotomy for tubal sterilization (N=219) between January 1995 and December 2005 was performed. The Accordion Grading System was used for the severity of complications. Results: No intraoperative complications were noted. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 patients (3.2%): 6 infections (grade 2) and 1 case of hemorrhage (grade 3). Conversion to laparoscopy was necessary in 10 patients (2.2%) due to anatomical constraints or pelvic adhesions; however, culdotomy with entry into the abdominal cavity was nevertheless successful in all 10 cases. The difference in the proportion with a history of pelvic surgery between the conversion and nonconversion groups was not statistically significant (P =.068). Patients with BMI ≥30 had a higher conversion rate compared to patients with BMI < 30 (11.4% versus 1.5%, P =.011). Tubal sterilization via culdotomy was successfully performed in all 11 women with no prior vaginal deliveries. Conclusion: Culdotomy appears to be a safe surgical approach to access the peritoneal cavity and is associated with a low complication rate. These data support the feasibility and safety of utilizing the cul-de-sac as an access portal for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach to access the peritoneal cavity and discuss its implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Methods: A retrospective chart review of women undergoing culdotomy for tubal sterilization (N=219) between January 1995 and December 2005 was performed. The Accordion Grading System was used for the severity of complications. Results: No intraoperative complications were noted. Postoperative complications occurred in 7 patients (3.2%): 6 infections (grade 2) and 1 case of hemorrhage (grade 3). Conversion to laparoscopy was necessary in 10 patients (2.2%) due to anatomical constraints or pelvic adhesions; however, culdotomy with entry into the abdominal cavity was nevertheless successful in all 10 cases. The difference in the proportion with a history of pelvic surgery between the conversion and nonconversion groups was not statistically significant (P =.068). Patients with BMI ≥30 had a higher conversion rate compared to patients with BMI < 30 (11.4% versus 1.5%, P =.011). Tubal sterilization via culdotomy was successfully performed in all 11 women with no prior vaginal deliveries. Conclusion: Culdotomy appears to be a safe surgical approach to access the peritoneal cavity and is associated with a low complication rate. These data support the feasibility and safety of utilizing the cul-de-sac as an access portal for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

KW - Culdotomy

KW - Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)

KW - Transluminal surgery

KW - Transvaginal approach/route/ surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871740123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871740123&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4293/108680812X13462882735854

DO - 10.4293/108680812X13462882735854

M3 - Article

C2 - 23318067

AN - SCOPUS:84871740123

VL - 16

SP - 413

EP - 420

JO - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

JF - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

SN - 1086-8089

IS - 3

ER -