TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and peri-operative outcomes during learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
T2 - A multi-institutional study of fellowship-trained robotic surgeons versus experienced open radical prostatectomy surgeons incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
AU - Leroy, Timothy J.
AU - Thiel, David D.
AU - Duchene, David A.
AU - Parker, Alex S.
AU - Igel, Todd C.
AU - Wehle, Michael J.
AU - Goetzl, Manilo
AU - Thrasher, J. Brantley
PY - 2010/10/1
Y1 - 2010/10/1
N2 - Purpose: To analyze and compare the safety and peri-operative outcomes of fellowship-trained robotic surgeons (FEL) and experienced open surgeons (OE) incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) into practice. Materials and Methods: Multiinstitutional, prospective data were collected on the first 30 RALP performed by FEL and OE (defined as over 1000 prostatectomies) incorporating RALP into practice. Morbidity from the peri-operative course was evaluated as were operative outcomes. The second 30 cases from the OE group were evaluated to assess for improvement with experience. Results: There were no rectal injuries or death in either group. Blood transfusion rates did not differ between the two groups (2% vs. 3%, p=0.65). Open conversion occurred three times in the OE group but only within the first 30 cases. In the first 30 cases FEL had statistically lower rates of positive margins (15% vs. 34%, p=0.008) and decreased likelihood of prolonged urethral catheter leakage (5% vs. 19%, p=0.009). The FEL group had lower rates of failure of prostate-specific antigen to nadir <0.15ng/mL (2% vs. 10%, p=0.056). There were no reoperations in the FEL group but present in 2% of the OE group initially. The second 30 cases of the OE group noted a statistical improvement for all parameters with margin rates and the requirement of prolonged catheterization becoming statistically comparable to those of the FEL group. Conclusions: OE can safely incorporate RALP into practice and achieve outcomes comparable to FEL quickly. As anticipated, FEL achieve these endpoints earlier in their practice.
AB - Purpose: To analyze and compare the safety and peri-operative outcomes of fellowship-trained robotic surgeons (FEL) and experienced open surgeons (OE) incorporating robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) into practice. Materials and Methods: Multiinstitutional, prospective data were collected on the first 30 RALP performed by FEL and OE (defined as over 1000 prostatectomies) incorporating RALP into practice. Morbidity from the peri-operative course was evaluated as were operative outcomes. The second 30 cases from the OE group were evaluated to assess for improvement with experience. Results: There were no rectal injuries or death in either group. Blood transfusion rates did not differ between the two groups (2% vs. 3%, p=0.65). Open conversion occurred three times in the OE group but only within the first 30 cases. In the first 30 cases FEL had statistically lower rates of positive margins (15% vs. 34%, p=0.008) and decreased likelihood of prolonged urethral catheter leakage (5% vs. 19%, p=0.009). The FEL group had lower rates of failure of prostate-specific antigen to nadir <0.15ng/mL (2% vs. 10%, p=0.056). There were no reoperations in the FEL group but present in 2% of the OE group initially. The second 30 cases of the OE group noted a statistical improvement for all parameters with margin rates and the requirement of prolonged catheterization becoming statistically comparable to those of the FEL group. Conclusions: OE can safely incorporate RALP into practice and achieve outcomes comparable to FEL quickly. As anticipated, FEL achieve these endpoints earlier in their practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958017036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958017036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/end.2009.0657
DO - 10.1089/end.2009.0657
M3 - Article
C2 - 20849279
AN - SCOPUS:77958017036
SN - 0892-7790
VL - 24
SP - 1665
EP - 1669
JO - Journal of endourology
JF - Journal of endourology
IS - 10
ER -