TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and efficacy of eculizumab in the prevention of antibody-mediated rejection in living-donor kidney transplant recipients requiring desensitization therapy
T2 - A randomized trial
AU - C10-001 Study Group
AU - Marks, William H.
AU - Mamode, Nizam
AU - Montgomery, Robert A.
AU - Stegall, Mark D.
AU - Ratner, Lloyd E.
AU - Cornell, Lynn D.
AU - Rowshani, Ajda T.
AU - Colvin, Robert B.
AU - Dain, Bradley
AU - Boice, Judith A.
AU - Glotz, Denis
AU - Kanellis, John
AU - Russ, Graeme
AU - Kamar, Nassim
AU - Lebranchu, Yvon
AU - Legendre, Christophe
AU - Rostaing, Lionel
AU - Hugo, Christian
AU - Colussi, Giacomo
AU - Rigotti, Paolo
AU - Reisaeter, Anna
AU - Oppenheimer, Frederic
AU - Mjörnstedt, Lars
AU - Tufveson, Gunnar
AU - Higgins, Robert
AU - Mason, Philip
AU - Torpey, Nicholas
AU - Chandraker, Anil
AU - Cooper, Matthew
AU - El-Amm, Jose
AU - Osama Gaber, A.
AU - Mannon, Roslyn
AU - Marsh, Christopher
AU - Patel, Anup
AU - Vincenti, Flavio
AU - West-Thielke, Patricia
AU - Wolf, Joshua
AU - Woodle, Steve
N1 - Funding Information:
Nizam Mamode was funded/supported by the National Institute for UK Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. The authors acknowledge Sorcha Mc Ginty and Ruth Gandolfo (Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK) who provided medical writing assistance in the production of the manuscript (funded by Alexion Pharmaceuticals) and Ram Gudavalli (Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA) for statistical support. The authors acknowledge the contributions of Emanuele Cozzi, Carmen Lefaucheur, and Christophe Legendre (synopsis and protocol development), Luan Truong and Volker Nickeleit (pathology evaluations), Karen Nelson (synopsis and protocol development, histocompatibility testing), Frans Claas and Dave Roelen (histocompatibility testing), Stanley Jordan (initial concept and early design [desensitization]), and Russell Wesson (protocol development and implementation).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - We report results of a phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open-label, two-arm study evaluating the safety and efficacy of eculizumab in preventing acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized recipients of living-donor kidney transplants requiring pretransplant desensitization (NCT01399593). In total, 102 patients underwent desensitization. Posttransplant, 51 patients received standard of care (SOC) and 51 received eculizumab. The primary end point was week 9 posttransplant treatment failure rate, a composite of: biopsy-proven acute AMR (Banff 2007 grade II or III; assessed by blinded central pathology); graft loss; death; or loss to follow-up. Eculizumab was well tolerated with no new safety concerns. No significant difference in treatment failure rate was observed between eculizumab (9.8%) and SOC (13.7%; P =.760). To determine whether data assessment assumptions affected study outcome, biopsies were reanalyzed by central pathologists using clinical information. The resulting treatment failure rates were 11.8% and 21.6% for the eculizumab and SOC groups, respectively (nominal P =.288). When reassessment included grade I AMR, the treatment failure rates were 11.8% (eculizumab) and 29.4% (SOC; nominal P =.048). This finding suggests a potential benefit for eculizumab compared with SOC in preventing acute AMR in recipients sensitized to their living-donor kidney transplants (EudraCT 2010-019630-28).
AB - We report results of a phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open-label, two-arm study evaluating the safety and efficacy of eculizumab in preventing acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in sensitized recipients of living-donor kidney transplants requiring pretransplant desensitization (NCT01399593). In total, 102 patients underwent desensitization. Posttransplant, 51 patients received standard of care (SOC) and 51 received eculizumab. The primary end point was week 9 posttransplant treatment failure rate, a composite of: biopsy-proven acute AMR (Banff 2007 grade II or III; assessed by blinded central pathology); graft loss; death; or loss to follow-up. Eculizumab was well tolerated with no new safety concerns. No significant difference in treatment failure rate was observed between eculizumab (9.8%) and SOC (13.7%; P =.760). To determine whether data assessment assumptions affected study outcome, biopsies were reanalyzed by central pathologists using clinical information. The resulting treatment failure rates were 11.8% and 21.6% for the eculizumab and SOC groups, respectively (nominal P =.288). When reassessment included grade I AMR, the treatment failure rates were 11.8% (eculizumab) and 29.4% (SOC; nominal P =.048). This finding suggests a potential benefit for eculizumab compared with SOC in preventing acute AMR in recipients sensitized to their living-donor kidney transplants (EudraCT 2010-019630-28).
KW - clinical research/practice
KW - complement biology
KW - donors and donation: living
KW - immunosuppressant - fusion proteins and monoclonal antibodies
KW - kidney transplantation/nephrology
KW - rejection: antibody-mediated (ABMR)
KW - sensitization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064656599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064656599&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ajt.15364
DO - 10.1111/ajt.15364
M3 - Article
C2 - 30887675
AN - SCOPUS:85064656599
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 19
SP - 2876
EP - 2888
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
IS - 10
ER -