Sacral tumor resection

The effect of surgical staging on patient outcomes, resource management, and hospital cost

Michael J. Brown, Daryl J Kor, Timothy B Curry, Matthew Warner, Eduardo S. Rodrigues, Steven H. Rose, Mark B. Dekutoski, James P. Moriarty, Kirsten Hall Long, Peter S. Rose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. Single-institution retrospective study. Objective. To assess the effect surgical staging (i.e., sequencing) has on clinical and economic outcomes for patients undergoing sacropelvic tumor resection requiring lumbopelvic stabilization. Summary of Background Data. Sacral corpectomy with lumbopelvic stabilization is an extensive surgical procedure that can be performed in either a single episode or multiple episodes of care on different days. The impact of varied sequencing of surgical episodes of care on patient, resource, and financial outcomes is unknown. Methods. This single-center retrospective case series identified all cases of sacropelvic tumor resection requiring lumbopelvic stabilization over an 8-year period. We assessed and compared clinical and economic outcomes for patients whose anterior exposure and posterior resection were separated into two distinct surgical episodes of care (staged) versus patients whose anterior exposure and posterior resection occurred in a single encounter (nonstaged procedures). Primary endpoints included procedural outcomes (operative and after-hours surgical time), resuscitative requirements, adverse perioperative events, mortality, and direct medical costs (hospital and physician) associated with the surgical episodes of interest. Results. From January 1, 2000, to July 15, 2008, a total of 25 patients were identified. Eight patients had their procedure staged. Surgical staging was associated with a significant increase in intensive care unit free days (P = 0.03), ventilator free days (P < 0.01), and reduced morbidity (P < 0.01). Surgical staging significantly reduced postoperative red blood cell (P = 0.03), and after-hours red blood cell (P < 0.01) and component requirements (P = 0.04). Mean total inpatient costs were $89,132 lower for patients undergoing the staged procedure (95% confidence interval of mean cost difference = -$178,899 to -$4661). Conclusion. Separating the anterior exposure and posterior resection phases of complex sacral tumor resection into two separate surgical episodes of care is associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced inpatient cost.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1570-1578
Number of pages9
JournalSpine
Volume36
Issue number19
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

Hospital Costs
Episode of Care
Neoplasms
Costs and Cost Analysis
Inpatients
Erythrocytes
Economics
Mechanical Ventilators
Operative Time
Intensive Care Units
Retrospective Studies
Confidence Intervals
Morbidity
Physicians
Mortality

Keywords

  • clinical outcomes
  • cost of care
  • resource utilization
  • sacrectomy
  • surgical staging

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Sacral tumor resection : The effect of surgical staging on patient outcomes, resource management, and hospital cost. / Brown, Michael J.; Kor, Daryl J; Curry, Timothy B; Warner, Matthew; Rodrigues, Eduardo S.; Rose, Steven H.; Dekutoski, Mark B.; Moriarty, James P.; Long, Kirsten Hall; Rose, Peter S.

In: Spine, Vol. 36, No. 19, 01.09.2011, p. 1570-1578.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Michael J. ; Kor, Daryl J ; Curry, Timothy B ; Warner, Matthew ; Rodrigues, Eduardo S. ; Rose, Steven H. ; Dekutoski, Mark B. ; Moriarty, James P. ; Long, Kirsten Hall ; Rose, Peter S. / Sacral tumor resection : The effect of surgical staging on patient outcomes, resource management, and hospital cost. In: Spine. 2011 ; Vol. 36, No. 19. pp. 1570-1578.
@article{3dd326437a6f4953a6767064d17f55fa,
title = "Sacral tumor resection: The effect of surgical staging on patient outcomes, resource management, and hospital cost",
abstract = "Study Design. Single-institution retrospective study. Objective. To assess the effect surgical staging (i.e., sequencing) has on clinical and economic outcomes for patients undergoing sacropelvic tumor resection requiring lumbopelvic stabilization. Summary of Background Data. Sacral corpectomy with lumbopelvic stabilization is an extensive surgical procedure that can be performed in either a single episode or multiple episodes of care on different days. The impact of varied sequencing of surgical episodes of care on patient, resource, and financial outcomes is unknown. Methods. This single-center retrospective case series identified all cases of sacropelvic tumor resection requiring lumbopelvic stabilization over an 8-year period. We assessed and compared clinical and economic outcomes for patients whose anterior exposure and posterior resection were separated into two distinct surgical episodes of care (staged) versus patients whose anterior exposure and posterior resection occurred in a single encounter (nonstaged procedures). Primary endpoints included procedural outcomes (operative and after-hours surgical time), resuscitative requirements, adverse perioperative events, mortality, and direct medical costs (hospital and physician) associated with the surgical episodes of interest. Results. From January 1, 2000, to July 15, 2008, a total of 25 patients were identified. Eight patients had their procedure staged. Surgical staging was associated with a significant increase in intensive care unit free days (P = 0.03), ventilator free days (P < 0.01), and reduced morbidity (P < 0.01). Surgical staging significantly reduced postoperative red blood cell (P = 0.03), and after-hours red blood cell (P < 0.01) and component requirements (P = 0.04). Mean total inpatient costs were $89,132 lower for patients undergoing the staged procedure (95{\%} confidence interval of mean cost difference = -$178,899 to -$4661). Conclusion. Separating the anterior exposure and posterior resection phases of complex sacral tumor resection into two separate surgical episodes of care is associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced inpatient cost.",
keywords = "clinical outcomes, cost of care, resource utilization, sacrectomy, surgical staging",
author = "Brown, {Michael J.} and Kor, {Daryl J} and Curry, {Timothy B} and Matthew Warner and Rodrigues, {Eduardo S.} and Rose, {Steven H.} and Dekutoski, {Mark B.} and Moriarty, {James P.} and Long, {Kirsten Hall} and Rose, {Peter S.}",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f6137d",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "1570--1578",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "19",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sacral tumor resection

T2 - The effect of surgical staging on patient outcomes, resource management, and hospital cost

AU - Brown, Michael J.

AU - Kor, Daryl J

AU - Curry, Timothy B

AU - Warner, Matthew

AU - Rodrigues, Eduardo S.

AU - Rose, Steven H.

AU - Dekutoski, Mark B.

AU - Moriarty, James P.

AU - Long, Kirsten Hall

AU - Rose, Peter S.

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - Study Design. Single-institution retrospective study. Objective. To assess the effect surgical staging (i.e., sequencing) has on clinical and economic outcomes for patients undergoing sacropelvic tumor resection requiring lumbopelvic stabilization. Summary of Background Data. Sacral corpectomy with lumbopelvic stabilization is an extensive surgical procedure that can be performed in either a single episode or multiple episodes of care on different days. The impact of varied sequencing of surgical episodes of care on patient, resource, and financial outcomes is unknown. Methods. This single-center retrospective case series identified all cases of sacropelvic tumor resection requiring lumbopelvic stabilization over an 8-year period. We assessed and compared clinical and economic outcomes for patients whose anterior exposure and posterior resection were separated into two distinct surgical episodes of care (staged) versus patients whose anterior exposure and posterior resection occurred in a single encounter (nonstaged procedures). Primary endpoints included procedural outcomes (operative and after-hours surgical time), resuscitative requirements, adverse perioperative events, mortality, and direct medical costs (hospital and physician) associated with the surgical episodes of interest. Results. From January 1, 2000, to July 15, 2008, a total of 25 patients were identified. Eight patients had their procedure staged. Surgical staging was associated with a significant increase in intensive care unit free days (P = 0.03), ventilator free days (P < 0.01), and reduced morbidity (P < 0.01). Surgical staging significantly reduced postoperative red blood cell (P = 0.03), and after-hours red blood cell (P < 0.01) and component requirements (P = 0.04). Mean total inpatient costs were $89,132 lower for patients undergoing the staged procedure (95% confidence interval of mean cost difference = -$178,899 to -$4661). Conclusion. Separating the anterior exposure and posterior resection phases of complex sacral tumor resection into two separate surgical episodes of care is associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced inpatient cost.

AB - Study Design. Single-institution retrospective study. Objective. To assess the effect surgical staging (i.e., sequencing) has on clinical and economic outcomes for patients undergoing sacropelvic tumor resection requiring lumbopelvic stabilization. Summary of Background Data. Sacral corpectomy with lumbopelvic stabilization is an extensive surgical procedure that can be performed in either a single episode or multiple episodes of care on different days. The impact of varied sequencing of surgical episodes of care on patient, resource, and financial outcomes is unknown. Methods. This single-center retrospective case series identified all cases of sacropelvic tumor resection requiring lumbopelvic stabilization over an 8-year period. We assessed and compared clinical and economic outcomes for patients whose anterior exposure and posterior resection were separated into two distinct surgical episodes of care (staged) versus patients whose anterior exposure and posterior resection occurred in a single encounter (nonstaged procedures). Primary endpoints included procedural outcomes (operative and after-hours surgical time), resuscitative requirements, adverse perioperative events, mortality, and direct medical costs (hospital and physician) associated with the surgical episodes of interest. Results. From January 1, 2000, to July 15, 2008, a total of 25 patients were identified. Eight patients had their procedure staged. Surgical staging was associated with a significant increase in intensive care unit free days (P = 0.03), ventilator free days (P < 0.01), and reduced morbidity (P < 0.01). Surgical staging significantly reduced postoperative red blood cell (P = 0.03), and after-hours red blood cell (P < 0.01) and component requirements (P = 0.04). Mean total inpatient costs were $89,132 lower for patients undergoing the staged procedure (95% confidence interval of mean cost difference = -$178,899 to -$4661). Conclusion. Separating the anterior exposure and posterior resection phases of complex sacral tumor resection into two separate surgical episodes of care is associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced inpatient cost.

KW - clinical outcomes

KW - cost of care

KW - resource utilization

KW - sacrectomy

KW - surgical staging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052272958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052272958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f6137d

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f6137d

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 1570

EP - 1578

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 19

ER -