Rural/urban differences in chemical dependency treatment. Results from the Minnesota Adult Household Survey.

T. J. Beebe, P. A. Harrison, J. A. McRae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research at the national level suggests fairly similar rates of substance abuse in rural and urban areas, with data for 1996 showing a slightly higher rate of drug use in urban areas but no difference in the rates of heavy alcohol use. The current study assesses differences between rural and urban areas in substance abuse and dependence, service utilization, and perceived barriers to services in Minnesota. Analysis of responses of a random sample of 7,508 adults stratified by residence reveals few differences between rural and urban settings. While urban residents have a slightly higher (marginally significant) rate of dependence on drugs and rural residents have a significantly greater tendency to talk to clergy about their problem, the subsamples exhibit remarkably similar patterns of abuse, need for treatment, propensity to seek treatment, service utilization, and perceived barriers to treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-50
Number of pages5
JournalMinnesota Medicine
Volume82
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Substance-Related Disorders
Clergy
Therapeutics
Alcohols
Dependency (Psychology)
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Rural/urban differences in chemical dependency treatment. Results from the Minnesota Adult Household Survey. / Beebe, T. J.; Harrison, P. A.; McRae, J. A.

In: Minnesota Medicine, Vol. 82, No. 11, 11.1999, p. 46-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beebe, T. J. ; Harrison, P. A. ; McRae, J. A. / Rural/urban differences in chemical dependency treatment. Results from the Minnesota Adult Household Survey. In: Minnesota Medicine. 1999 ; Vol. 82, No. 11. pp. 46-50.
@article{2ee1eaafb215499cbf427870de08d57f,
title = "Rural/urban differences in chemical dependency treatment. Results from the Minnesota Adult Household Survey.",
abstract = "Research at the national level suggests fairly similar rates of substance abuse in rural and urban areas, with data for 1996 showing a slightly higher rate of drug use in urban areas but no difference in the rates of heavy alcohol use. The current study assesses differences between rural and urban areas in substance abuse and dependence, service utilization, and perceived barriers to services in Minnesota. Analysis of responses of a random sample of 7,508 adults stratified by residence reveals few differences between rural and urban settings. While urban residents have a slightly higher (marginally significant) rate of dependence on drugs and rural residents have a significantly greater tendency to talk to clergy about their problem, the subsamples exhibit remarkably similar patterns of abuse, need for treatment, propensity to seek treatment, service utilization, and perceived barriers to treatment.",
author = "Beebe, {T. J.} and Harrison, {P. A.} and McRae, {J. A.}",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "82",
pages = "46--50",
journal = "Minnesota medicine.",
issn = "0026-556X",
publisher = "Minnesota Medical Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rural/urban differences in chemical dependency treatment. Results from the Minnesota Adult Household Survey.

AU - Beebe, T. J.

AU - Harrison, P. A.

AU - McRae, J. A.

PY - 1999/11

Y1 - 1999/11

N2 - Research at the national level suggests fairly similar rates of substance abuse in rural and urban areas, with data for 1996 showing a slightly higher rate of drug use in urban areas but no difference in the rates of heavy alcohol use. The current study assesses differences between rural and urban areas in substance abuse and dependence, service utilization, and perceived barriers to services in Minnesota. Analysis of responses of a random sample of 7,508 adults stratified by residence reveals few differences between rural and urban settings. While urban residents have a slightly higher (marginally significant) rate of dependence on drugs and rural residents have a significantly greater tendency to talk to clergy about their problem, the subsamples exhibit remarkably similar patterns of abuse, need for treatment, propensity to seek treatment, service utilization, and perceived barriers to treatment.

AB - Research at the national level suggests fairly similar rates of substance abuse in rural and urban areas, with data for 1996 showing a slightly higher rate of drug use in urban areas but no difference in the rates of heavy alcohol use. The current study assesses differences between rural and urban areas in substance abuse and dependence, service utilization, and perceived barriers to services in Minnesota. Analysis of responses of a random sample of 7,508 adults stratified by residence reveals few differences between rural and urban settings. While urban residents have a slightly higher (marginally significant) rate of dependence on drugs and rural residents have a significantly greater tendency to talk to clergy about their problem, the subsamples exhibit remarkably similar patterns of abuse, need for treatment, propensity to seek treatment, service utilization, and perceived barriers to treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033220499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033220499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10589212

AN - SCOPUS:0033220499

VL - 82

SP - 46

EP - 50

JO - Minnesota medicine.

JF - Minnesota medicine.

SN - 0026-556X

IS - 11

ER -