Routine pelvic examinations: A descriptive cross-sectional survey of women's attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines

Juliana M. Kling, Suneela Vegunta, Mina Al-Badri, Stephanie S. Faubion, Heather E. Fields, Amit A. Shah, Mark Wallace, Barbara Ruddy, Michael Bryan, M'hamed Temkit, Kathy Mac Laughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Routine pelvic examinations have been a fundamental part of the annual female examination. The 2014 American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline recommends against routine pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, average-risk women. Our aim was to evaluate women's attitudes and beliefs about pelvic examinations and how knowledge of the new guidelines contributes to attitudes and beliefs. A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed using a self-administered written survey developed through literature review and pretested and revised on the basis of staff suggestions. Nonpregnant women age ≥ 21 years presenting to outpatient clinics at Mayo Clinic in Arizona or Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, received the survey. After being asked about pelvic examination practices and beliefs, participants were informed of the ACP guideline, to determine effect on attitudes and beliefs. Demographic characteristics and pertinent medical history questions were collected from participants. In total, 671 women who were predominantly white, married, and educated completed surveys. Participants described pelvic examinations as reassuring, and a majority believed the examinations were useful in detecting ovarian cancer (74.6%), necessary for screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (71.0%), or necessary before initiating contraception (67.0%). After reading the 2014 ACP guideline, significantly fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations (P < 0.001). Despite evidence to the contrary, women believed pelvic examinations were necessary for STI screening, contraception initiation, and ovarian cancer detection. After education on the ACP screening guideline, fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)60-64
Number of pages5
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume94
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Gynecological Examination
Cross-Sectional Studies
Guidelines
Physicians
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Contraception
Ovarian Neoplasms
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Reading
Demography
Education

Keywords

  • Pap smears
  • Patient education
  • Screening pelvic examination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Routine pelvic examinations : A descriptive cross-sectional survey of women's attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines. / Kling, Juliana M.; Vegunta, Suneela; Al-Badri, Mina; Faubion, Stephanie S.; Fields, Heather E.; Shah, Amit A.; Wallace, Mark; Ruddy, Barbara; Bryan, Michael; Temkit, M'hamed; Mac Laughlin, Kathy.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 94, 01.01.2017, p. 60-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kling, Juliana M. ; Vegunta, Suneela ; Al-Badri, Mina ; Faubion, Stephanie S. ; Fields, Heather E. ; Shah, Amit A. ; Wallace, Mark ; Ruddy, Barbara ; Bryan, Michael ; Temkit, M'hamed ; Mac Laughlin, Kathy. / Routine pelvic examinations : A descriptive cross-sectional survey of women's attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines. In: Preventive Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 94. pp. 60-64.
@article{50fac7ff4fa64904b80ee8fd1a4f6684,
title = "Routine pelvic examinations: A descriptive cross-sectional survey of women's attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines",
abstract = "Routine pelvic examinations have been a fundamental part of the annual female examination. The 2014 American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline recommends against routine pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, average-risk women. Our aim was to evaluate women's attitudes and beliefs about pelvic examinations and how knowledge of the new guidelines contributes to attitudes and beliefs. A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed using a self-administered written survey developed through literature review and pretested and revised on the basis of staff suggestions. Nonpregnant women age ≥ 21 years presenting to outpatient clinics at Mayo Clinic in Arizona or Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, received the survey. After being asked about pelvic examination practices and beliefs, participants were informed of the ACP guideline, to determine effect on attitudes and beliefs. Demographic characteristics and pertinent medical history questions were collected from participants. In total, 671 women who were predominantly white, married, and educated completed surveys. Participants described pelvic examinations as reassuring, and a majority believed the examinations were useful in detecting ovarian cancer (74.6{\%}), necessary for screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (71.0{\%}), or necessary before initiating contraception (67.0{\%}). After reading the 2014 ACP guideline, significantly fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations (P < 0.001). Despite evidence to the contrary, women believed pelvic examinations were necessary for STI screening, contraception initiation, and ovarian cancer detection. After education on the ACP screening guideline, fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations.",
keywords = "Pap smears, Patient education, Screening pelvic examination",
author = "Kling, {Juliana M.} and Suneela Vegunta and Mina Al-Badri and Faubion, {Stephanie S.} and Fields, {Heather E.} and Shah, {Amit A.} and Mark Wallace and Barbara Ruddy and Michael Bryan and M'hamed Temkit and {Mac Laughlin}, Kathy",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "60--64",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Routine pelvic examinations

T2 - A descriptive cross-sectional survey of women's attitudes and beliefs after new guidelines

AU - Kling, Juliana M.

AU - Vegunta, Suneela

AU - Al-Badri, Mina

AU - Faubion, Stephanie S.

AU - Fields, Heather E.

AU - Shah, Amit A.

AU - Wallace, Mark

AU - Ruddy, Barbara

AU - Bryan, Michael

AU - Temkit, M'hamed

AU - Mac Laughlin, Kathy

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Routine pelvic examinations have been a fundamental part of the annual female examination. The 2014 American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline recommends against routine pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, average-risk women. Our aim was to evaluate women's attitudes and beliefs about pelvic examinations and how knowledge of the new guidelines contributes to attitudes and beliefs. A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed using a self-administered written survey developed through literature review and pretested and revised on the basis of staff suggestions. Nonpregnant women age ≥ 21 years presenting to outpatient clinics at Mayo Clinic in Arizona or Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, received the survey. After being asked about pelvic examination practices and beliefs, participants were informed of the ACP guideline, to determine effect on attitudes and beliefs. Demographic characteristics and pertinent medical history questions were collected from participants. In total, 671 women who were predominantly white, married, and educated completed surveys. Participants described pelvic examinations as reassuring, and a majority believed the examinations were useful in detecting ovarian cancer (74.6%), necessary for screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (71.0%), or necessary before initiating contraception (67.0%). After reading the 2014 ACP guideline, significantly fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations (P < 0.001). Despite evidence to the contrary, women believed pelvic examinations were necessary for STI screening, contraception initiation, and ovarian cancer detection. After education on the ACP screening guideline, fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations.

AB - Routine pelvic examinations have been a fundamental part of the annual female examination. The 2014 American College of Physicians (ACP) guideline recommends against routine pelvic examinations in asymptomatic, nonpregnant, average-risk women. Our aim was to evaluate women's attitudes and beliefs about pelvic examinations and how knowledge of the new guidelines contributes to attitudes and beliefs. A descriptive cross-sectional study was performed using a self-administered written survey developed through literature review and pretested and revised on the basis of staff suggestions. Nonpregnant women age ≥ 21 years presenting to outpatient clinics at Mayo Clinic in Arizona or Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, received the survey. After being asked about pelvic examination practices and beliefs, participants were informed of the ACP guideline, to determine effect on attitudes and beliefs. Demographic characteristics and pertinent medical history questions were collected from participants. In total, 671 women who were predominantly white, married, and educated completed surveys. Participants described pelvic examinations as reassuring, and a majority believed the examinations were useful in detecting ovarian cancer (74.6%), necessary for screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (71.0%), or necessary before initiating contraception (67.0%). After reading the 2014 ACP guideline, significantly fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations (P < 0.001). Despite evidence to the contrary, women believed pelvic examinations were necessary for STI screening, contraception initiation, and ovarian cancer detection. After education on the ACP screening guideline, fewer women planned to continue yearly pelvic examinations.

KW - Pap smears

KW - Patient education

KW - Screening pelvic examination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85003914588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85003914588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 27856341

AN - SCOPUS:85003914588

VL - 94

SP - 60

EP - 64

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

ER -