Rotating Platform Knees

An Emerging Clinical Standard. In Opposition

Mark Pagnano, R. Michael Menghini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As surgeons, we share the common goals of making total knee arthroplasty as reliable, as reproducible, and as durable as we can. For that reason, we are almost compelled to investigate the rotating platform knee because of the contentions that it might improve patellar tracking, decrease lateral release rates, improve flexion, or perhaps give better wear characteristics over the long term. But when we take a step back and carefully examine the scientific data from 20 years of clinical experience with the rotating platform knee, the data speak for itself. To date, there are no demonstrated clinical advantages in regard to wear, survivorship, kinematics, range of motion, or patellar function. The rotating platform design then is really just another knee design, clinically indistinguishable from many well-functioning, fixed-bearing total knee designs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)37-39
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume21
Issue number4 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Knee
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Articular Range of Motion
Biomechanical Phenomena

Keywords

  • fixed-bearing design
  • rotating platform knee
  • total knee arthroplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Rotating Platform Knees : An Emerging Clinical Standard. In Opposition. / Pagnano, Mark; Menghini, R. Michael.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 21, No. 4 SUPPL., 01.06.2006, p. 37-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pagnano, Mark ; Menghini, R. Michael. / Rotating Platform Knees : An Emerging Clinical Standard. In Opposition. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2006 ; Vol. 21, No. 4 SUPPL. pp. 37-39.
@article{2cecacd285594ecba8da1a7b6aadd492,
title = "Rotating Platform Knees: An Emerging Clinical Standard. In Opposition",
abstract = "As surgeons, we share the common goals of making total knee arthroplasty as reliable, as reproducible, and as durable as we can. For that reason, we are almost compelled to investigate the rotating platform knee because of the contentions that it might improve patellar tracking, decrease lateral release rates, improve flexion, or perhaps give better wear characteristics over the long term. But when we take a step back and carefully examine the scientific data from 20 years of clinical experience with the rotating platform knee, the data speak for itself. To date, there are no demonstrated clinical advantages in regard to wear, survivorship, kinematics, range of motion, or patellar function. The rotating platform design then is really just another knee design, clinically indistinguishable from many well-functioning, fixed-bearing total knee designs.",
keywords = "fixed-bearing design, rotating platform knee, total knee arthroplasty",
author = "Mark Pagnano and Menghini, {R. Michael}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "37--39",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "4 SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rotating Platform Knees

T2 - An Emerging Clinical Standard. In Opposition

AU - Pagnano, Mark

AU - Menghini, R. Michael

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - As surgeons, we share the common goals of making total knee arthroplasty as reliable, as reproducible, and as durable as we can. For that reason, we are almost compelled to investigate the rotating platform knee because of the contentions that it might improve patellar tracking, decrease lateral release rates, improve flexion, or perhaps give better wear characteristics over the long term. But when we take a step back and carefully examine the scientific data from 20 years of clinical experience with the rotating platform knee, the data speak for itself. To date, there are no demonstrated clinical advantages in regard to wear, survivorship, kinematics, range of motion, or patellar function. The rotating platform design then is really just another knee design, clinically indistinguishable from many well-functioning, fixed-bearing total knee designs.

AB - As surgeons, we share the common goals of making total knee arthroplasty as reliable, as reproducible, and as durable as we can. For that reason, we are almost compelled to investigate the rotating platform knee because of the contentions that it might improve patellar tracking, decrease lateral release rates, improve flexion, or perhaps give better wear characteristics over the long term. But when we take a step back and carefully examine the scientific data from 20 years of clinical experience with the rotating platform knee, the data speak for itself. To date, there are no demonstrated clinical advantages in regard to wear, survivorship, kinematics, range of motion, or patellar function. The rotating platform design then is really just another knee design, clinically indistinguishable from many well-functioning, fixed-bearing total knee designs.

KW - fixed-bearing design

KW - rotating platform knee

KW - total knee arthroplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744971835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744971835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.022

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.022

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 37

EP - 39

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 4 SUPPL.

ER -