Role and timing of coronary intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Karim D. Mahmoud, David Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has become the most common presentation of acute myocardial infarction. Its treatment is challenging and often less straightforward compared with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). First, clinicians must decide whether an initial invasive or an initial conservative treatment is appropriate for their NSTEMI patient. If an invasive strategy is chosen, subsequent decisions on the optimal timing of coronary angiography and possible intervention have to be made. Both aggressive and conservative strategies have their own potential risks and benefits. Aggressive strategies may result in more procedural complications, which is especially unwanted in patients otherwise at low risk of events. By contrast, conservative strategies may be harmful in high-risk patients who benefit most from early reperfusion therapy. We aim to discuss the evidence base of this decision process where risk stratification is of paramount importance with the goal of obtaining the optimal outcome for the individual patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)183-198
Number of pages16
JournalInterventional Cardiology (London)
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Secondary Prevention
Coronary Angiography
Reperfusion
Myocardial Infarction
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
Therapeutics
Conservative Treatment
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

  • acute coronary syndrome
  • angiography
  • coronary artery bypass grafting delay
  • coronary artery disease
  • myocardial infarction
  • percutaneous coronary intervention
  • risk stratification
  • strategy
  • timing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Role and timing of coronary intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. / Mahmoud, Karim D.; Holmes, David.

In: Interventional Cardiology (London), Vol. 6, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 183-198.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{7ff860c5224a488b9bb987825b6bc613,
title = "Role and timing of coronary intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction",
abstract = "Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has become the most common presentation of acute myocardial infarction. Its treatment is challenging and often less straightforward compared with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). First, clinicians must decide whether an initial invasive or an initial conservative treatment is appropriate for their NSTEMI patient. If an invasive strategy is chosen, subsequent decisions on the optimal timing of coronary angiography and possible intervention have to be made. Both aggressive and conservative strategies have their own potential risks and benefits. Aggressive strategies may result in more procedural complications, which is especially unwanted in patients otherwise at low risk of events. By contrast, conservative strategies may be harmful in high-risk patients who benefit most from early reperfusion therapy. We aim to discuss the evidence base of this decision process where risk stratification is of paramount importance with the goal of obtaining the optimal outcome for the individual patient.",
keywords = "acute coronary syndrome, angiography, coronary artery bypass grafting delay, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, risk stratification, strategy, timing",
author = "Mahmoud, {Karim D.} and David Holmes",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2217/ica.14.7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "183--198",
journal = "Interventional Cardiology (London)",
issn = "1755-5302",
publisher = "Future Medicine Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role and timing of coronary intervention in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

AU - Mahmoud, Karim D.

AU - Holmes, David

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has become the most common presentation of acute myocardial infarction. Its treatment is challenging and often less straightforward compared with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). First, clinicians must decide whether an initial invasive or an initial conservative treatment is appropriate for their NSTEMI patient. If an invasive strategy is chosen, subsequent decisions on the optimal timing of coronary angiography and possible intervention have to be made. Both aggressive and conservative strategies have their own potential risks and benefits. Aggressive strategies may result in more procedural complications, which is especially unwanted in patients otherwise at low risk of events. By contrast, conservative strategies may be harmful in high-risk patients who benefit most from early reperfusion therapy. We aim to discuss the evidence base of this decision process where risk stratification is of paramount importance with the goal of obtaining the optimal outcome for the individual patient.

AB - Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) has become the most common presentation of acute myocardial infarction. Its treatment is challenging and often less straightforward compared with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). First, clinicians must decide whether an initial invasive or an initial conservative treatment is appropriate for their NSTEMI patient. If an invasive strategy is chosen, subsequent decisions on the optimal timing of coronary angiography and possible intervention have to be made. Both aggressive and conservative strategies have their own potential risks and benefits. Aggressive strategies may result in more procedural complications, which is especially unwanted in patients otherwise at low risk of events. By contrast, conservative strategies may be harmful in high-risk patients who benefit most from early reperfusion therapy. We aim to discuss the evidence base of this decision process where risk stratification is of paramount importance with the goal of obtaining the optimal outcome for the individual patient.

KW - acute coronary syndrome

KW - angiography

KW - coronary artery bypass grafting delay

KW - coronary artery disease

KW - myocardial infarction

KW - percutaneous coronary intervention

KW - risk stratification

KW - strategy

KW - timing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84900454680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84900454680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2217/ica.14.7

DO - 10.2217/ica.14.7

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84900454680

VL - 6

SP - 183

EP - 198

JO - Interventional Cardiology (London)

JF - Interventional Cardiology (London)

SN - 1755-5302

IS - 2

ER -