Risk stratification of rhabdomyosarcoma: a moving target

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Known prognostic factors for rhabdomyosarcoma include primary site, stage, group (amount of tumor remaining after initial surgery before chemotherapy), lymph node involvement, age, and histology. These factors are taken into account when determining risk stratification for treatment allocation, with some differences between the European and U.S. approaches. The relationship of fusion status for PAX-3 of PAX-7 FOXO1 to outcome has been analyzed by a number of groups, but many of the studies are troubled by problems inherent in the use of convenience cohorts and the fact that patients in the analyzed groups are not always treated in a uniform fashion. One recent study analyzed outcome of patients treated in a similar fashion on the same protocol and found that patients with alveolar histology who were fusion negative had an outcome similar to those with embryonal histology. This article reviews many of the studies surrounding fusion status and outcome, risk stratification issues, and outcome of risk groups. The time is rapidly approaching in which fusion status will be used to allocate therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma.

Fingerprint

Rhabdomyosarcoma
Histology
Lymph Nodes
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Drug Therapy
Therapeutics
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{a662b386b0cb434fb9fe2846dd65e5f6,
title = "Risk stratification of rhabdomyosarcoma: a moving target",
abstract = "Known prognostic factors for rhabdomyosarcoma include primary site, stage, group (amount of tumor remaining after initial surgery before chemotherapy), lymph node involvement, age, and histology. These factors are taken into account when determining risk stratification for treatment allocation, with some differences between the European and U.S. approaches. The relationship of fusion status for PAX-3 of PAX-7 FOXO1 to outcome has been analyzed by a number of groups, but many of the studies are troubled by problems inherent in the use of convenience cohorts and the fact that patients in the analyzed groups are not always treated in a uniform fashion. One recent study analyzed outcome of patients treated in a similar fashion on the same protocol and found that patients with alveolar histology who were fusion negative had an outcome similar to those with embryonal histology. This article reviews many of the studies surrounding fusion status and outcome, risk stratification issues, and outcome of risk groups. The time is rapidly approaching in which fusion status will be used to allocate therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma.",
author = "Arndt, {Carola A.S.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.415",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "415--419",
journal = "American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting",
issn = "1548-8756",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Oncology",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk stratification of rhabdomyosarcoma

T2 - a moving target

AU - Arndt, Carola A.S.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Known prognostic factors for rhabdomyosarcoma include primary site, stage, group (amount of tumor remaining after initial surgery before chemotherapy), lymph node involvement, age, and histology. These factors are taken into account when determining risk stratification for treatment allocation, with some differences between the European and U.S. approaches. The relationship of fusion status for PAX-3 of PAX-7 FOXO1 to outcome has been analyzed by a number of groups, but many of the studies are troubled by problems inherent in the use of convenience cohorts and the fact that patients in the analyzed groups are not always treated in a uniform fashion. One recent study analyzed outcome of patients treated in a similar fashion on the same protocol and found that patients with alveolar histology who were fusion negative had an outcome similar to those with embryonal histology. This article reviews many of the studies surrounding fusion status and outcome, risk stratification issues, and outcome of risk groups. The time is rapidly approaching in which fusion status will be used to allocate therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma.

AB - Known prognostic factors for rhabdomyosarcoma include primary site, stage, group (amount of tumor remaining after initial surgery before chemotherapy), lymph node involvement, age, and histology. These factors are taken into account when determining risk stratification for treatment allocation, with some differences between the European and U.S. approaches. The relationship of fusion status for PAX-3 of PAX-7 FOXO1 to outcome has been analyzed by a number of groups, but many of the studies are troubled by problems inherent in the use of convenience cohorts and the fact that patients in the analyzed groups are not always treated in a uniform fashion. One recent study analyzed outcome of patients treated in a similar fashion on the same protocol and found that patients with alveolar histology who were fusion negative had an outcome similar to those with embryonal histology. This article reviews many of the studies surrounding fusion status and outcome, risk stratification issues, and outcome of risk groups. The time is rapidly approaching in which fusion status will be used to allocate therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929422337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929422337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.415

DO - 10.1200/EdBook_AM.2013.33.415

M3 - Review article

C2 - 23714563

AN - SCOPUS:84929422337

SP - 415

EP - 419

JO - American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting

JF - American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book / ASCO. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Meeting

SN - 1548-8756

ER -