Risk Prediction for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in 11 United States-Based Case-Control Studies: Incorporation of Epidemiologic Risk Factors and 17 Confirmed Genetic Loci

Merlise A. Clyde, Rachel Palmieri Weber, Edwin S. Iversen, Elizabeth M. Poole, Jennifer A. Doherty, Marc T. Goodman, Roberta B. Ness, Harvey A. Risch, Mary Anne Rossing, Kathryn L. Terry, Nicolas Wentzensen, Alice S. Whittemore, Hoda Anton-Culver, Elisa V. Bandera, Andrew Berchuck, Michael E. Carney, Daniel W. Cramer, Julie M Cunningham, Kara L. Cushing-Haugen, Robert P. EdwardsBrooke L. Fridley, Ellen L Goode, Galina Lurie, Valerie McGuire, Francesmary Modugno, Kirsten B. Moysich, Sara H. Olson, Celeste Leigh Pearce, Malcolm C. Pike, Joseph H. Rothstein, Thomas A. Sellers, Weiva Sieh, Daniel Stram, Pamela J. Thompson, Robert A. Vierkant, Kristine G. Wicklund, Anna H. Wu, Argyrios Ziogas, Shelley S. Tworoger, Joellen M. Schildkraut

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Previously developed models for predicting absolute risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have included a limited number of risk factors and have had low discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) < 0.60). Because of this, we developed and internally validated a relative risk prediction model that incorporates 17 established epidemiologic risk factors and 17 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using data from 11 case-control studies in the United States (5,793 cases; 9,512 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (data accrued from 1992 to 2010). We developed a hierarchical logistic regression model for predicting case-control status that included imputation of missing data. We randomly divided the data into an 80% training sample and used the remaining 20% for model evaluation. The AUC for the full model was 0.664. A reduced model without SNPs performed similarly (AUC = 0.649). Both models performed better than a baseline model that included age and study site only (AUC = 0.563). The best predictive power was obtained in the full model among women younger than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.714); however, the addition of SNPs increased the AUC the most for women older than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.638 vs. 0.616). Adapting this improved model to estimate absolute risk and evaluating it in prospective data sets is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)555-569
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume184
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Factors
Genetic Loci
Area Under Curve
Case-Control Studies
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Logistic Models
Ovarian epithelial cancer
ROC Curve
Ovarian Neoplasms
Genome

Keywords

  • Genetic risk polymorphisms
  • model evaluation
  • ovarian cancer
  • risk model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Risk Prediction for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in 11 United States-Based Case-Control Studies : Incorporation of Epidemiologic Risk Factors and 17 Confirmed Genetic Loci. / Clyde, Merlise A.; Palmieri Weber, Rachel; Iversen, Edwin S.; Poole, Elizabeth M.; Doherty, Jennifer A.; Goodman, Marc T.; Ness, Roberta B.; Risch, Harvey A.; Rossing, Mary Anne; Terry, Kathryn L.; Wentzensen, Nicolas; Whittemore, Alice S.; Anton-Culver, Hoda; Bandera, Elisa V.; Berchuck, Andrew; Carney, Michael E.; Cramer, Daniel W.; Cunningham, Julie M; Cushing-Haugen, Kara L.; Edwards, Robert P.; Fridley, Brooke L.; Goode, Ellen L; Lurie, Galina; McGuire, Valerie; Modugno, Francesmary; Moysich, Kirsten B.; Olson, Sara H.; Pearce, Celeste Leigh; Pike, Malcolm C.; Rothstein, Joseph H.; Sellers, Thomas A.; Sieh, Weiva; Stram, Daniel; Thompson, Pamela J.; Vierkant, Robert A.; Wicklund, Kristine G.; Wu, Anna H.; Ziogas, Argyrios; Tworoger, Shelley S.; Schildkraut, Joellen M.

In: American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 184, No. 8, 15.10.2016, p. 555-569.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Clyde, MA, Palmieri Weber, R, Iversen, ES, Poole, EM, Doherty, JA, Goodman, MT, Ness, RB, Risch, HA, Rossing, MA, Terry, KL, Wentzensen, N, Whittemore, AS, Anton-Culver, H, Bandera, EV, Berchuck, A, Carney, ME, Cramer, DW, Cunningham, JM, Cushing-Haugen, KL, Edwards, RP, Fridley, BL, Goode, EL, Lurie, G, McGuire, V, Modugno, F, Moysich, KB, Olson, SH, Pearce, CL, Pike, MC, Rothstein, JH, Sellers, TA, Sieh, W, Stram, D, Thompson, PJ, Vierkant, RA, Wicklund, KG, Wu, AH, Ziogas, A, Tworoger, SS & Schildkraut, JM 2016, 'Risk Prediction for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in 11 United States-Based Case-Control Studies: Incorporation of Epidemiologic Risk Factors and 17 Confirmed Genetic Loci', American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 184, no. 8, pp. 555-569. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kww091
Clyde, Merlise A. ; Palmieri Weber, Rachel ; Iversen, Edwin S. ; Poole, Elizabeth M. ; Doherty, Jennifer A. ; Goodman, Marc T. ; Ness, Roberta B. ; Risch, Harvey A. ; Rossing, Mary Anne ; Terry, Kathryn L. ; Wentzensen, Nicolas ; Whittemore, Alice S. ; Anton-Culver, Hoda ; Bandera, Elisa V. ; Berchuck, Andrew ; Carney, Michael E. ; Cramer, Daniel W. ; Cunningham, Julie M ; Cushing-Haugen, Kara L. ; Edwards, Robert P. ; Fridley, Brooke L. ; Goode, Ellen L ; Lurie, Galina ; McGuire, Valerie ; Modugno, Francesmary ; Moysich, Kirsten B. ; Olson, Sara H. ; Pearce, Celeste Leigh ; Pike, Malcolm C. ; Rothstein, Joseph H. ; Sellers, Thomas A. ; Sieh, Weiva ; Stram, Daniel ; Thompson, Pamela J. ; Vierkant, Robert A. ; Wicklund, Kristine G. ; Wu, Anna H. ; Ziogas, Argyrios ; Tworoger, Shelley S. ; Schildkraut, Joellen M. / Risk Prediction for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in 11 United States-Based Case-Control Studies : Incorporation of Epidemiologic Risk Factors and 17 Confirmed Genetic Loci. In: American Journal of Epidemiology. 2016 ; Vol. 184, No. 8. pp. 555-569.
@article{224680d73d2c40acacac83845c59c482,
title = "Risk Prediction for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in 11 United States-Based Case-Control Studies: Incorporation of Epidemiologic Risk Factors and 17 Confirmed Genetic Loci",
abstract = "Previously developed models for predicting absolute risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have included a limited number of risk factors and have had low discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) < 0.60). Because of this, we developed and internally validated a relative risk prediction model that incorporates 17 established epidemiologic risk factors and 17 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using data from 11 case-control studies in the United States (5,793 cases; 9,512 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (data accrued from 1992 to 2010). We developed a hierarchical logistic regression model for predicting case-control status that included imputation of missing data. We randomly divided the data into an 80{\%} training sample and used the remaining 20{\%} for model evaluation. The AUC for the full model was 0.664. A reduced model without SNPs performed similarly (AUC = 0.649). Both models performed better than a baseline model that included age and study site only (AUC = 0.563). The best predictive power was obtained in the full model among women younger than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.714); however, the addition of SNPs increased the AUC the most for women older than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.638 vs. 0.616). Adapting this improved model to estimate absolute risk and evaluating it in prospective data sets is warranted.",
keywords = "Genetic risk polymorphisms, model evaluation, ovarian cancer, risk model",
author = "Clyde, {Merlise A.} and {Palmieri Weber}, Rachel and Iversen, {Edwin S.} and Poole, {Elizabeth M.} and Doherty, {Jennifer A.} and Goodman, {Marc T.} and Ness, {Roberta B.} and Risch, {Harvey A.} and Rossing, {Mary Anne} and Terry, {Kathryn L.} and Nicolas Wentzensen and Whittemore, {Alice S.} and Hoda Anton-Culver and Bandera, {Elisa V.} and Andrew Berchuck and Carney, {Michael E.} and Cramer, {Daniel W.} and Cunningham, {Julie M} and Cushing-Haugen, {Kara L.} and Edwards, {Robert P.} and Fridley, {Brooke L.} and Goode, {Ellen L} and Galina Lurie and Valerie McGuire and Francesmary Modugno and Moysich, {Kirsten B.} and Olson, {Sara H.} and Pearce, {Celeste Leigh} and Pike, {Malcolm C.} and Rothstein, {Joseph H.} and Sellers, {Thomas A.} and Weiva Sieh and Daniel Stram and Thompson, {Pamela J.} and Vierkant, {Robert A.} and Wicklund, {Kristine G.} and Wu, {Anna H.} and Argyrios Ziogas and Tworoger, {Shelley S.} and Schildkraut, {Joellen M.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1093/aje/kww091",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "184",
pages = "555--569",
journal = "American Journal of Epidemiology",
issn = "0002-9262",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk Prediction for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in 11 United States-Based Case-Control Studies

T2 - Incorporation of Epidemiologic Risk Factors and 17 Confirmed Genetic Loci

AU - Clyde, Merlise A.

AU - Palmieri Weber, Rachel

AU - Iversen, Edwin S.

AU - Poole, Elizabeth M.

AU - Doherty, Jennifer A.

AU - Goodman, Marc T.

AU - Ness, Roberta B.

AU - Risch, Harvey A.

AU - Rossing, Mary Anne

AU - Terry, Kathryn L.

AU - Wentzensen, Nicolas

AU - Whittemore, Alice S.

AU - Anton-Culver, Hoda

AU - Bandera, Elisa V.

AU - Berchuck, Andrew

AU - Carney, Michael E.

AU - Cramer, Daniel W.

AU - Cunningham, Julie M

AU - Cushing-Haugen, Kara L.

AU - Edwards, Robert P.

AU - Fridley, Brooke L.

AU - Goode, Ellen L

AU - Lurie, Galina

AU - McGuire, Valerie

AU - Modugno, Francesmary

AU - Moysich, Kirsten B.

AU - Olson, Sara H.

AU - Pearce, Celeste Leigh

AU - Pike, Malcolm C.

AU - Rothstein, Joseph H.

AU - Sellers, Thomas A.

AU - Sieh, Weiva

AU - Stram, Daniel

AU - Thompson, Pamela J.

AU - Vierkant, Robert A.

AU - Wicklund, Kristine G.

AU - Wu, Anna H.

AU - Ziogas, Argyrios

AU - Tworoger, Shelley S.

AU - Schildkraut, Joellen M.

PY - 2016/10/15

Y1 - 2016/10/15

N2 - Previously developed models for predicting absolute risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have included a limited number of risk factors and have had low discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) < 0.60). Because of this, we developed and internally validated a relative risk prediction model that incorporates 17 established epidemiologic risk factors and 17 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using data from 11 case-control studies in the United States (5,793 cases; 9,512 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (data accrued from 1992 to 2010). We developed a hierarchical logistic regression model for predicting case-control status that included imputation of missing data. We randomly divided the data into an 80% training sample and used the remaining 20% for model evaluation. The AUC for the full model was 0.664. A reduced model without SNPs performed similarly (AUC = 0.649). Both models performed better than a baseline model that included age and study site only (AUC = 0.563). The best predictive power was obtained in the full model among women younger than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.714); however, the addition of SNPs increased the AUC the most for women older than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.638 vs. 0.616). Adapting this improved model to estimate absolute risk and evaluating it in prospective data sets is warranted.

AB - Previously developed models for predicting absolute risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have included a limited number of risk factors and have had low discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) < 0.60). Because of this, we developed and internally validated a relative risk prediction model that incorporates 17 established epidemiologic risk factors and 17 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using data from 11 case-control studies in the United States (5,793 cases; 9,512 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (data accrued from 1992 to 2010). We developed a hierarchical logistic regression model for predicting case-control status that included imputation of missing data. We randomly divided the data into an 80% training sample and used the remaining 20% for model evaluation. The AUC for the full model was 0.664. A reduced model without SNPs performed similarly (AUC = 0.649). Both models performed better than a baseline model that included age and study site only (AUC = 0.563). The best predictive power was obtained in the full model among women younger than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.714); however, the addition of SNPs increased the AUC the most for women older than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.638 vs. 0.616). Adapting this improved model to estimate absolute risk and evaluating it in prospective data sets is warranted.

KW - Genetic risk polymorphisms

KW - model evaluation

KW - ovarian cancer

KW - risk model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994152183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994152183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/aje/kww091

DO - 10.1093/aje/kww091

M3 - Article

C2 - 27698005

AN - SCOPUS:84994152183

VL - 184

SP - 555

EP - 569

JO - American Journal of Epidemiology

JF - American Journal of Epidemiology

SN - 0002-9262

IS - 8

ER -