TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Venous Thromboembolism Among Patients With Incident ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
T2 - A 20-Year Population-Based Cohort Study
AU - Berti, Alvise
AU - Matteson, Eric L.
AU - Crowson, Cynthia S.
AU - Specks, Ulrich
AU - Cornec, Divi
N1 - Funding Information:
Grant Support: This study was made possible by the Rochester Epidemiology Project (grant number R01-AG034676; Principal Investigators: Walter A. Rocca, MD, and Jennifer L. St Sauver, PhD). The work was also supported by Clinical and Translational Science Awards grant UL1 TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Objective: To assess the cardiovascular disease (CVD) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risks among patients with newly diagnosed antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). Patients and Methods: A population-based incident AAV cohort of 58 patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2015 in Olmsted County, MN, was identified by medical record review. For each patient, 3 age- and sex-matched non-AAV comparators were randomly selected from the same population and assigned an index date corresponding to the AAV incidence date. Medical records of cases and comparators were reviewed for CVD events, which included cardiac events (coronary artery disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and VTE, which included deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Results: Baseline total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and current smoking rate were lower in AAV than in comparators (P=.03, P=.01, and P=.04, respectively), whereas other CVD risk factors and Framingham risk score were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The CVD events developed in 13 patients and 17 comparators, corresponding to a more than 3-fold increased risk (hazard ratio [HR], 3.15; 95% CI, 1.51-6.57). By subtypes, risks were increased for cardiac events (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.42-6.15) and CVA (HR, 8.16; 95% CI, 2.45-27.15), but not for PVD. The HR for VTE was 3.26 (95% CI, 0.84-12.60), significantly increased for DVT (HR, 6.25; 95% CI, 1.16-33.60), but not for PE (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.23-7.54). Conclusion: Despite a similar prevalence of CVD risk factors at baseline, the risk of CVD is more than 3-fold higher and for CVA 8-fold higher in patients with incident AAV than in matched comparator subjects.
AB - Objective: To assess the cardiovascular disease (CVD) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risks among patients with newly diagnosed antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). Patients and Methods: A population-based incident AAV cohort of 58 patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2015 in Olmsted County, MN, was identified by medical record review. For each patient, 3 age- and sex-matched non-AAV comparators were randomly selected from the same population and assigned an index date corresponding to the AAV incidence date. Medical records of cases and comparators were reviewed for CVD events, which included cardiac events (coronary artery disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation), cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), peripheral vascular disease (PVD), and VTE, which included deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Results: Baseline total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and current smoking rate were lower in AAV than in comparators (P=.03, P=.01, and P=.04, respectively), whereas other CVD risk factors and Framingham risk score were not significantly different between the 2 groups. The CVD events developed in 13 patients and 17 comparators, corresponding to a more than 3-fold increased risk (hazard ratio [HR], 3.15; 95% CI, 1.51-6.57). By subtypes, risks were increased for cardiac events (HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.42-6.15) and CVA (HR, 8.16; 95% CI, 2.45-27.15), but not for PVD. The HR for VTE was 3.26 (95% CI, 0.84-12.60), significantly increased for DVT (HR, 6.25; 95% CI, 1.16-33.60), but not for PE (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.23-7.54). Conclusion: Despite a similar prevalence of CVD risk factors at baseline, the risk of CVD is more than 3-fold higher and for CVA 8-fold higher in patients with incident AAV than in matched comparator subjects.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044341953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044341953&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.02.010
DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.02.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 29588079
AN - SCOPUS:85044341953
SN - 0025-6196
VL - 93
SP - 597
EP - 606
JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings
IS - 5
ER -