Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention

Nassir M. Thalji, Rakesh M. Suri, Kevin L. Greason, Hartzell V Schaff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surgical risk models estimate operative outcomes while controlling for heterogeneity in 'case mix' within and between institutions. In cardiac surgery, risk models are used for patient counselling, surgical decision-making, clinical research, quality assurance and improvement, and financial reimbursement. Importantly, risk models are only as good as the databases from which they are derived; physicians and investigators should, therefore, be aware of shortcomings of clinical and administrative databases used for modelling risk estimates. The most frequently modelled outcome in cardiac surgery is 30-day mortality. However, results of randomized trials to compare conventional surgery versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) indicate attrition of surgical patients at 2-4 months postoperatively, suggesting that 3-month survival or mortality might be an appropriate procedural end point worth modelling. Risk models are increasingly used to identify patients who might be better-suited for TAVI. However, the appropriateness of available statistical models in this application is controversial, particularly given the tendency of risk models to misestimate operative mortality in high-risk patient subsets. Incorporation of new risk factors (such as previous mediastinal radiation, liver failure, and frailty) in future surgical or interventional risk-prediction tools might enhance model performance, and thereby optimize patient selection for TAVI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)704-714
Number of pages11
JournalNature Reviews Cardiology
Volume11
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 11 2014

Fingerprint

Thoracic Surgery
Mortality
Databases
Anatomic Models
Diagnosis-Related Groups
Liver Failure
Statistical Models
Quality Improvement
Patient Selection
Counseling
Research Personnel
Radiation
Physicians
Survival
Research
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention. / Thalji, Nassir M.; Suri, Rakesh M.; Greason, Kevin L.; Schaff, Hartzell V.

In: Nature Reviews Cardiology, Vol. 11, No. 12, 11.12.2014, p. 704-714.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thalji, Nassir M. ; Suri, Rakesh M. ; Greason, Kevin L. ; Schaff, Hartzell V. / Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention. In: Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2014 ; Vol. 11, No. 12. pp. 704-714.
@article{ece59479a23e4b2bb0c4cee0f75d2ab8,
title = "Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention",
abstract = "Surgical risk models estimate operative outcomes while controlling for heterogeneity in 'case mix' within and between institutions. In cardiac surgery, risk models are used for patient counselling, surgical decision-making, clinical research, quality assurance and improvement, and financial reimbursement. Importantly, risk models are only as good as the databases from which they are derived; physicians and investigators should, therefore, be aware of shortcomings of clinical and administrative databases used for modelling risk estimates. The most frequently modelled outcome in cardiac surgery is 30-day mortality. However, results of randomized trials to compare conventional surgery versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) indicate attrition of surgical patients at 2-4 months postoperatively, suggesting that 3-month survival or mortality might be an appropriate procedural end point worth modelling. Risk models are increasingly used to identify patients who might be better-suited for TAVI. However, the appropriateness of available statistical models in this application is controversial, particularly given the tendency of risk models to misestimate operative mortality in high-risk patient subsets. Incorporation of new risk factors (such as previous mediastinal radiation, liver failure, and frailty) in future surgical or interventional risk-prediction tools might enhance model performance, and thereby optimize patient selection for TAVI.",
author = "Thalji, {Nassir M.} and Suri, {Rakesh M.} and Greason, {Kevin L.} and Schaff, {Hartzell V}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1038/nrcardio.2014.136",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "704--714",
journal = "Nature Reviews Cardiology",
issn = "1759-5002",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention

AU - Thalji, Nassir M.

AU - Suri, Rakesh M.

AU - Greason, Kevin L.

AU - Schaff, Hartzell V

PY - 2014/12/11

Y1 - 2014/12/11

N2 - Surgical risk models estimate operative outcomes while controlling for heterogeneity in 'case mix' within and between institutions. In cardiac surgery, risk models are used for patient counselling, surgical decision-making, clinical research, quality assurance and improvement, and financial reimbursement. Importantly, risk models are only as good as the databases from which they are derived; physicians and investigators should, therefore, be aware of shortcomings of clinical and administrative databases used for modelling risk estimates. The most frequently modelled outcome in cardiac surgery is 30-day mortality. However, results of randomized trials to compare conventional surgery versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) indicate attrition of surgical patients at 2-4 months postoperatively, suggesting that 3-month survival or mortality might be an appropriate procedural end point worth modelling. Risk models are increasingly used to identify patients who might be better-suited for TAVI. However, the appropriateness of available statistical models in this application is controversial, particularly given the tendency of risk models to misestimate operative mortality in high-risk patient subsets. Incorporation of new risk factors (such as previous mediastinal radiation, liver failure, and frailty) in future surgical or interventional risk-prediction tools might enhance model performance, and thereby optimize patient selection for TAVI.

AB - Surgical risk models estimate operative outcomes while controlling for heterogeneity in 'case mix' within and between institutions. In cardiac surgery, risk models are used for patient counselling, surgical decision-making, clinical research, quality assurance and improvement, and financial reimbursement. Importantly, risk models are only as good as the databases from which they are derived; physicians and investigators should, therefore, be aware of shortcomings of clinical and administrative databases used for modelling risk estimates. The most frequently modelled outcome in cardiac surgery is 30-day mortality. However, results of randomized trials to compare conventional surgery versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) indicate attrition of surgical patients at 2-4 months postoperatively, suggesting that 3-month survival or mortality might be an appropriate procedural end point worth modelling. Risk models are increasingly used to identify patients who might be better-suited for TAVI. However, the appropriateness of available statistical models in this application is controversial, particularly given the tendency of risk models to misestimate operative mortality in high-risk patient subsets. Incorporation of new risk factors (such as previous mediastinal radiation, liver failure, and frailty) in future surgical or interventional risk-prediction tools might enhance model performance, and thereby optimize patient selection for TAVI.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927564491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927564491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.136

DO - 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.136

M3 - Article

C2 - 25245832

AN - SCOPUS:84927564491

VL - 11

SP - 704

EP - 714

JO - Nature Reviews Cardiology

JF - Nature Reviews Cardiology

SN - 1759-5002

IS - 12

ER -