Review and evaluation of online tobacco dependence treatment training programs for health care practitioners

Peter Selby, Karina Goncharenko, Megan Barker, Myra Fahim, Valerie Timothy, Rosa Dragonetti, Katherine Kemper, Marilyn Herie, James Taylor Hays

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Training health care professionals is associated with increased capacity to deliver evidence-based smoking cessation interventions and increased quit rates among their patients. Online training programs hold promise to provide training but questions remain regarding the quality and usability of available programs. Objective: The aim was to assess the quality of English-language online courses in tobacco dependence treatment using a validated instrument. Methods: An environmental scan was conducted using the Google search engine to identify available online tobacco dependence treatment courses. The identified courses were then evaluated using the Peer Review Rubric for Online Learning, which was selected based on its ability to evaluate instructional design. It also has clear and concise criteria descriptions to ensure uniformity of evaluations by trained experts. Results: A total of 39 courses were identified, of which 24 unique courses were assessed based on their accessibility and functionality during the period of evaluation. Overall, the course ratings indicated that 17 of 24 courses evaluated failed to meet minimal quality standards and none of the courses evaluated could be ranked as superior. However, many excelled in providing effective navigation, course rationale, and content. Many were weak in the use of instructional design elements, such as teaching effectiveness, learning strategies, instructor's role, and assessment and evaluation. Evaluation results and suggestions for improvement were shared with course administrators. Conclusions: Based on the courses evaluated in this review, course developers are encouraged to employ best practices in instructional design, such as cohesiveness of material, linearity of design, practice exercises, problem solving, and ongoing evaluation to improve existing courses and in the design of new online learning opportunities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e97
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Tobacco Use Disorder
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Learning
Therapeutics
Search Engine
Peer Review
Aptitude
Smoking Cessation
Administrative Personnel
Practice Guidelines
Teaching
Language
Exercise

Keywords

  • Continuing medical education
  • Distance education
  • Health care
  • Program evaluation
  • Smoking cessation
  • Tobacco dependence
  • Tobacco use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Review and evaluation of online tobacco dependence treatment training programs for health care practitioners. / Selby, Peter; Goncharenko, Karina; Barker, Megan; Fahim, Myra; Timothy, Valerie; Dragonetti, Rosa; Kemper, Katherine; Herie, Marilyn; Hays, James Taylor.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. e97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Selby, P, Goncharenko, K, Barker, M, Fahim, M, Timothy, V, Dragonetti, R, Kemper, K, Herie, M & Hays, JT 2015, 'Review and evaluation of online tobacco dependence treatment training programs for health care practitioners', Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. e97. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3284
Selby, Peter ; Goncharenko, Karina ; Barker, Megan ; Fahim, Myra ; Timothy, Valerie ; Dragonetti, Rosa ; Kemper, Katherine ; Herie, Marilyn ; Hays, James Taylor. / Review and evaluation of online tobacco dependence treatment training programs for health care practitioners. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. e97.
@article{aeed8edccfcc483199c8154805eb6359,
title = "Review and evaluation of online tobacco dependence treatment training programs for health care practitioners",
abstract = "Background: Training health care professionals is associated with increased capacity to deliver evidence-based smoking cessation interventions and increased quit rates among their patients. Online training programs hold promise to provide training but questions remain regarding the quality and usability of available programs. Objective: The aim was to assess the quality of English-language online courses in tobacco dependence treatment using a validated instrument. Methods: An environmental scan was conducted using the Google search engine to identify available online tobacco dependence treatment courses. The identified courses were then evaluated using the Peer Review Rubric for Online Learning, which was selected based on its ability to evaluate instructional design. It also has clear and concise criteria descriptions to ensure uniformity of evaluations by trained experts. Results: A total of 39 courses were identified, of which 24 unique courses were assessed based on their accessibility and functionality during the period of evaluation. Overall, the course ratings indicated that 17 of 24 courses evaluated failed to meet minimal quality standards and none of the courses evaluated could be ranked as superior. However, many excelled in providing effective navigation, course rationale, and content. Many were weak in the use of instructional design elements, such as teaching effectiveness, learning strategies, instructor's role, and assessment and evaluation. Evaluation results and suggestions for improvement were shared with course administrators. Conclusions: Based on the courses evaluated in this review, course developers are encouraged to employ best practices in instructional design, such as cohesiveness of material, linearity of design, practice exercises, problem solving, and ongoing evaluation to improve existing courses and in the design of new online learning opportunities.",
keywords = "Continuing medical education, Distance education, Health care, Program evaluation, Smoking cessation, Tobacco dependence, Tobacco use",
author = "Peter Selby and Karina Goncharenko and Megan Barker and Myra Fahim and Valerie Timothy and Rosa Dragonetti and Katherine Kemper and Marilyn Herie and Hays, {James Taylor}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.3284",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "e97",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review and evaluation of online tobacco dependence treatment training programs for health care practitioners

AU - Selby, Peter

AU - Goncharenko, Karina

AU - Barker, Megan

AU - Fahim, Myra

AU - Timothy, Valerie

AU - Dragonetti, Rosa

AU - Kemper, Katherine

AU - Herie, Marilyn

AU - Hays, James Taylor

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Background: Training health care professionals is associated with increased capacity to deliver evidence-based smoking cessation interventions and increased quit rates among their patients. Online training programs hold promise to provide training but questions remain regarding the quality and usability of available programs. Objective: The aim was to assess the quality of English-language online courses in tobacco dependence treatment using a validated instrument. Methods: An environmental scan was conducted using the Google search engine to identify available online tobacco dependence treatment courses. The identified courses were then evaluated using the Peer Review Rubric for Online Learning, which was selected based on its ability to evaluate instructional design. It also has clear and concise criteria descriptions to ensure uniformity of evaluations by trained experts. Results: A total of 39 courses were identified, of which 24 unique courses were assessed based on their accessibility and functionality during the period of evaluation. Overall, the course ratings indicated that 17 of 24 courses evaluated failed to meet minimal quality standards and none of the courses evaluated could be ranked as superior. However, many excelled in providing effective navigation, course rationale, and content. Many were weak in the use of instructional design elements, such as teaching effectiveness, learning strategies, instructor's role, and assessment and evaluation. Evaluation results and suggestions for improvement were shared with course administrators. Conclusions: Based on the courses evaluated in this review, course developers are encouraged to employ best practices in instructional design, such as cohesiveness of material, linearity of design, practice exercises, problem solving, and ongoing evaluation to improve existing courses and in the design of new online learning opportunities.

AB - Background: Training health care professionals is associated with increased capacity to deliver evidence-based smoking cessation interventions and increased quit rates among their patients. Online training programs hold promise to provide training but questions remain regarding the quality and usability of available programs. Objective: The aim was to assess the quality of English-language online courses in tobacco dependence treatment using a validated instrument. Methods: An environmental scan was conducted using the Google search engine to identify available online tobacco dependence treatment courses. The identified courses were then evaluated using the Peer Review Rubric for Online Learning, which was selected based on its ability to evaluate instructional design. It also has clear and concise criteria descriptions to ensure uniformity of evaluations by trained experts. Results: A total of 39 courses were identified, of which 24 unique courses were assessed based on their accessibility and functionality during the period of evaluation. Overall, the course ratings indicated that 17 of 24 courses evaluated failed to meet minimal quality standards and none of the courses evaluated could be ranked as superior. However, many excelled in providing effective navigation, course rationale, and content. Many were weak in the use of instructional design elements, such as teaching effectiveness, learning strategies, instructor's role, and assessment and evaluation. Evaluation results and suggestions for improvement were shared with course administrators. Conclusions: Based on the courses evaluated in this review, course developers are encouraged to employ best practices in instructional design, such as cohesiveness of material, linearity of design, practice exercises, problem solving, and ongoing evaluation to improve existing courses and in the design of new online learning opportunities.

KW - Continuing medical education

KW - Distance education

KW - Health care

KW - Program evaluation

KW - Smoking cessation

KW - Tobacco dependence

KW - Tobacco use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929247925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84929247925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.3284

DO - 10.2196/jmir.3284

M3 - Article

C2 - 25887187

AN - SCOPUS:84929247925

VL - 17

SP - e97

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 4

ER -