Revascularization for acute mesenteric ischemia

Evan J. Ryer, Manju Kalra, Gustavo S. Oderich, Audra A. Duncan, Peter Gloviczki, Stephen Cha, Thomas C. Bower

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

86 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) remains difficult to diagnose, carries a high rate of complications, and is associated with significant mortality. We evaluated our experience with AMI over the last 2 decades to evaluate changes in management and assess current outcomes. Methods: Data from consecutive patients who underwent arterial revascularization for AMI over a 20-year period (January 1990-January 2010) were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, treatment modalities, and outcomes over the last decade (2000-2010) were compared with those of the preceding decade (1990-1999) previously reported. Results: Over the last 2 decades, 93 patients with AMI underwent emergency arterial revascularization. Forty-five patients were treated during the 1990s and 48 during the 2000s. The majority of these patients were transferred from outside facilities. Patient demographics and risk factors were similar between the 2 decades with the exception that the more contemporary patients were significantly older (65.1 ± 14 vs 71.3 ± 14; P =.04). Etiology remained constant between the groups with in situ thrombosis being the most common followed by arterial embolus. The majority of patients were treated with open revascularization. Endovascular therapy alone or as a hybrid procedure was used in 11 total patients, eight of which were treated in the last 10 years. The use of second-look laparotomy was much more liberal in the last decade (80% vs 48%; P =.003) Thirty-day mortality was 27% in the 1990s and 17% during the 2000s (P = 0.28). Major adverse events occurred in 47% of patients with no difference between decades. There was no significant difference in outcomes between open and endovascular revascularization. On univariate analysis, elevated SVS comorbidity score, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease predicted early death, while a history of chronic mesenteric ischemia appeared protective. On multivariate analysis, no factor independently predicted perioperative mortality. Bowel resection and cerebrovascular disease predicted postoperative morbidity, while advanced age and connective tissue disease predicted long-term mortality. Conclusions: Morbidity and mortality from AMI continues to be high. Revascularization by endovascular means, although more frequent in the last decade, was still utilized in a minority of patients with severe AMI. Advanced ischemia with bowel infarction at presentation, and markers of generalized atherosclerosis are predictors of poor outcome, while history of chronic mesenteric ischemia is associated with better outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1682-1689
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of vascular surgery
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Revascularization for acute mesenteric ischemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Ryer, E. J., Kalra, M., Oderich, G. S., Duncan, A. A., Gloviczki, P., Cha, S., & Bower, T. C. (2012). Revascularization for acute mesenteric ischemia. Journal of vascular surgery, 55(6), 1682-1689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.12.017