Rethinking guidelines for VTE risk among nursing home residents: A population-based study merging medical record detail with standardized nursing home assessments

Cynthia L. Leibson, Tanya M. Petterson, Carin Y. Smith, Kent R. Bailey, Jane A. Emerson, Aneel A. Ashrani, Paul Y. Takahashi, John A. Heit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nursing home (NH) residents are at increased risk for both VTE and bleeding from pharmacologic prophylaxis. Construction of prophylaxis guidelines is hampered by NHspecific limitations with VTE case identification and characterization of risk. We addressed these limitations by merging detailed provider-linked Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Minimum Data Set (MDS) NH assessments. METHODS: This population-based nested case-control study identified all Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents with first-lifetime VTE October 1, 1998, through December 31, 2005, while a resident of an NH (N = 91) and one to two age-, sex-, and calendar year-matched NH non-VTE control subjects. For each NH case without hospitalization 3 months before VTE (n = 23), we additionally identified three to four nonhospitalized NH control subjects. REP and MDS records were reviewed before index date (VTE date for cases; respective REP encounter date for control subjects) for numerous characteristics previously associated with VTE in non-NH populations. Data were modeled using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The multivariate model consisting of all cases and control subjects identified only three characteristics independently associated with VTE: respiratory infection vs no infection (OR, 5.9; 95% CI, 2.6-13.1), extensive or total assistance with walking in room (5.6, 2.5-12.6), and general surgery (3.3, 1.0-10.8). In analyses limited to nonhospitalized cases and control subjects, only nonrespiratory infection vs no infection was independently associated with VTE (8.8, 2.7-29.2). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous assumptions, most VTE risk factors identified in non-NH populations do not apply to the NH population. NH residents with infection, substantial mobility limitations, or recent general surgery should be considered potential candidates for VTE prophylaxis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)412-421
Number of pages10
JournalChest
Volume146
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking guidelines for VTE risk among nursing home residents: A population-based study merging medical record detail with standardized nursing home assessments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this