Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: An analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007

David A. Wetter, James A. Yiannias, Amy V. Prakash, Mark D P Davis, Sara A. Farmer, Rokea A. El-Azhary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patch testing to a standard screening series of allergens in combination with supplemental cosmetic allergens is often used to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis due to personal care products. Objective: To report results of patch testing to skin care product allergens contained in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series and to compare efficacy of this combined series in detecting positive reactions to personal care product allergens with the efficacy of various standard screening series. Methods: Positive reaction rates to skin care product allergens were tabulated for patients who underwent patch testing to both standard and cosmetic series allergens at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2007. Data were compared with skin care allergens detected on standard screening series, including the thin-layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) test. Results: Of 945 patch-tested patients, 68.4% had at least one positive reaction and 47.3% had at least two positive reactions. Also, 49.4% of patients reacted to at least one preservative; 31.2% reacted to at least one fragrance/botanical additive. Compared with use of our standard series and cosmetic series, use of the TRUE test would have missed 22.5% of patients with preservative allergy, 11.3% with fragrance/botanical allergy, and 17.3% with vehicle allergy. Limitations: Various allergens tested over time, patch test reading by residents, and lack of confirmation of allergen in personal care products. Conclusion: Standard patch-test screening series miss a substantial number of patients with skin care product ingredient allergy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)789-798
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume63
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Contact Dermatitis
Cosmetics
Allergens
Skin Care
Hypersensitivity
Patch Tests
Allergic Contact Dermatitis
Reading

Keywords

  • allergens
  • contact dermatitis
  • cosmetics
  • patch tests
  • skin care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series : An analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007. / Wetter, David A.; Yiannias, James A.; Prakash, Amy V.; Davis, Mark D P; Farmer, Sara A.; El-Azhary, Rokea A.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, Vol. 63, No. 5, 11.2010, p. 789-798.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{67c56fe51e07433f8ef6b650a12004c9,
title = "Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: An analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007",
abstract = "Background: Patch testing to a standard screening series of allergens in combination with supplemental cosmetic allergens is often used to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis due to personal care products. Objective: To report results of patch testing to skin care product allergens contained in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series and to compare efficacy of this combined series in detecting positive reactions to personal care product allergens with the efficacy of various standard screening series. Methods: Positive reaction rates to skin care product allergens were tabulated for patients who underwent patch testing to both standard and cosmetic series allergens at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2007. Data were compared with skin care allergens detected on standard screening series, including the thin-layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) test. Results: Of 945 patch-tested patients, 68.4{\%} had at least one positive reaction and 47.3{\%} had at least two positive reactions. Also, 49.4{\%} of patients reacted to at least one preservative; 31.2{\%} reacted to at least one fragrance/botanical additive. Compared with use of our standard series and cosmetic series, use of the TRUE test would have missed 22.5{\%} of patients with preservative allergy, 11.3{\%} with fragrance/botanical allergy, and 17.3{\%} with vehicle allergy. Limitations: Various allergens tested over time, patch test reading by residents, and lack of confirmation of allergen in personal care products. Conclusion: Standard patch-test screening series miss a substantial number of patients with skin care product ingredient allergy.",
keywords = "allergens, contact dermatitis, cosmetics, patch tests, skin care",
author = "Wetter, {David A.} and Yiannias, {James A.} and Prakash, {Amy V.} and Davis, {Mark D P} and Farmer, {Sara A.} and El-Azhary, {Rokea A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "789--798",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology",
issn = "0190-9622",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series

T2 - An analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007

AU - Wetter, David A.

AU - Yiannias, James A.

AU - Prakash, Amy V.

AU - Davis, Mark D P

AU - Farmer, Sara A.

AU - El-Azhary, Rokea A.

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Background: Patch testing to a standard screening series of allergens in combination with supplemental cosmetic allergens is often used to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis due to personal care products. Objective: To report results of patch testing to skin care product allergens contained in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series and to compare efficacy of this combined series in detecting positive reactions to personal care product allergens with the efficacy of various standard screening series. Methods: Positive reaction rates to skin care product allergens were tabulated for patients who underwent patch testing to both standard and cosmetic series allergens at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2007. Data were compared with skin care allergens detected on standard screening series, including the thin-layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) test. Results: Of 945 patch-tested patients, 68.4% had at least one positive reaction and 47.3% had at least two positive reactions. Also, 49.4% of patients reacted to at least one preservative; 31.2% reacted to at least one fragrance/botanical additive. Compared with use of our standard series and cosmetic series, use of the TRUE test would have missed 22.5% of patients with preservative allergy, 11.3% with fragrance/botanical allergy, and 17.3% with vehicle allergy. Limitations: Various allergens tested over time, patch test reading by residents, and lack of confirmation of allergen in personal care products. Conclusion: Standard patch-test screening series miss a substantial number of patients with skin care product ingredient allergy.

AB - Background: Patch testing to a standard screening series of allergens in combination with supplemental cosmetic allergens is often used to diagnose allergic contact dermatitis due to personal care products. Objective: To report results of patch testing to skin care product allergens contained in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series and to compare efficacy of this combined series in detecting positive reactions to personal care product allergens with the efficacy of various standard screening series. Methods: Positive reaction rates to skin care product allergens were tabulated for patients who underwent patch testing to both standard and cosmetic series allergens at Mayo Clinic between 2000 and 2007. Data were compared with skin care allergens detected on standard screening series, including the thin-layer rapid use epicutaneous (TRUE) test. Results: Of 945 patch-tested patients, 68.4% had at least one positive reaction and 47.3% had at least two positive reactions. Also, 49.4% of patients reacted to at least one preservative; 31.2% reacted to at least one fragrance/botanical additive. Compared with use of our standard series and cosmetic series, use of the TRUE test would have missed 22.5% of patients with preservative allergy, 11.3% with fragrance/botanical allergy, and 17.3% with vehicle allergy. Limitations: Various allergens tested over time, patch test reading by residents, and lack of confirmation of allergen in personal care products. Conclusion: Standard patch-test screening series miss a substantial number of patients with skin care product ingredient allergy.

KW - allergens

KW - contact dermatitis

KW - cosmetics

KW - patch tests

KW - skin care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957994994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957994994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033

DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.033

M3 - Article

C2 - 20643495

AN - SCOPUS:77957994994

VL - 63

SP - 789

EP - 798

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

SN - 0190-9622

IS - 5

ER -