Responsiveness of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in adults undergoing strabismus surgery

Sarah R. Hatt, David A. Leske, Jonathan M Holmes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the responsiveness of 2 health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires, the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25), to changes in HRQOL after strabismus surgery. Design: Cohort study. Participants: We included 106 adults (aged 1884 years; median, 48.5) undergoing strabismus surgery, 80 (75%) with diplopia and 26 (25%) without diplopia. Methods: All participants completed AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires preoperatively and a median of 7 weeks (range, 413) postoperatively. Using predefined clinical criteria, postoperative outcomes were graded as either "success" (n = 65), "partial success" (n = 32), or "failure" (n = 9). Main Outcome Measures: For each questionnaire, mean composite and subscale scores (range, 0100; worst to best HRQOL) were calculated for each patient. Median change in scores pre- to postoperatively was compared for successes, partial successes, and failures, and the proportion of patients whose scores exceeded 95% limits of agreement was calculated. Results: Successfully aligned diplopic patients (n = 46) showed greater improvement than failures (n = 7) using both the AS-20 questionnaire (21.3 [quartiles 12.535.0] vs. 8.8 [3.812.5]; P = 0.002) and the VFQ-25 questionnaire (18.3 [8.626.1] vs 8.3 [0.813.5]; P = 0.02). Successfully aligned nondiplopic patients (n = 19) also showed greater improvement than failures (n = 2; AS-20, 23.8 [10.032.5] vs -3.1 [-10.0 to 3.8]; P = 0.05). In nondiplopic patients, changes on VFQ-25 were small but significantly greater for successes than failures (5.0 [0.010.1] vs -15.4 [-19.4 to -11.4]; P = 0.03). More successfully aligned patients showed improvement exceeding the 95% limits of agreement for AS-20 scores than VFQ-25 scores (67% vs 65% [P = 0.8] for diplopic patients and 63% vs 21% [P = 0.005] for nondiplopic patients). Conclusions: The AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires are responsive to improved HRQOL in adults undergoing successful strabismus surgery. Changes on VFQ-25 were smaller, particularly for nondiplopic strabismus. The AS-20 is more responsive than the VFQ-25 across the range of adult strabismus. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalOphthalmology
Volume117
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Strabismus
Quality of Life
Diplopia
Surveys and Questionnaires
National Eye Institute (U.S.)
Disclosure
Cohort Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Responsiveness of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in adults undergoing strabismus surgery. / Hatt, Sarah R.; Leske, David A.; Holmes, Jonathan M.

In: Ophthalmology, Vol. 117, No. 12, 12.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90c2f6071b1b4a1fb3e4d28c1bc369a3,
title = "Responsiveness of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in adults undergoing strabismus surgery",
abstract = "Objective: To evaluate the responsiveness of 2 health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires, the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25), to changes in HRQOL after strabismus surgery. Design: Cohort study. Participants: We included 106 adults (aged 1884 years; median, 48.5) undergoing strabismus surgery, 80 (75{\%}) with diplopia and 26 (25{\%}) without diplopia. Methods: All participants completed AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires preoperatively and a median of 7 weeks (range, 413) postoperatively. Using predefined clinical criteria, postoperative outcomes were graded as either {"}success{"} (n = 65), {"}partial success{"} (n = 32), or {"}failure{"} (n = 9). Main Outcome Measures: For each questionnaire, mean composite and subscale scores (range, 0100; worst to best HRQOL) were calculated for each patient. Median change in scores pre- to postoperatively was compared for successes, partial successes, and failures, and the proportion of patients whose scores exceeded 95{\%} limits of agreement was calculated. Results: Successfully aligned diplopic patients (n = 46) showed greater improvement than failures (n = 7) using both the AS-20 questionnaire (21.3 [quartiles 12.535.0] vs. 8.8 [3.812.5]; P = 0.002) and the VFQ-25 questionnaire (18.3 [8.626.1] vs 8.3 [0.813.5]; P = 0.02). Successfully aligned nondiplopic patients (n = 19) also showed greater improvement than failures (n = 2; AS-20, 23.8 [10.032.5] vs -3.1 [-10.0 to 3.8]; P = 0.05). In nondiplopic patients, changes on VFQ-25 were small but significantly greater for successes than failures (5.0 [0.010.1] vs -15.4 [-19.4 to -11.4]; P = 0.03). More successfully aligned patients showed improvement exceeding the 95{\%} limits of agreement for AS-20 scores than VFQ-25 scores (67{\%} vs 65{\%} [P = 0.8] for diplopic patients and 63{\%} vs 21{\%} [P = 0.005] for nondiplopic patients). Conclusions: The AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires are responsive to improved HRQOL in adults undergoing successful strabismus surgery. Changes on VFQ-25 were smaller, particularly for nondiplopic strabismus. The AS-20 is more responsive than the VFQ-25 across the range of adult strabismus. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.",
author = "Hatt, {Sarah R.} and Leske, {David A.} and Holmes, {Jonathan M}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
journal = "Ophthalmology",
issn = "0161-6420",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsiveness of health-related quality-of-life questionnaires in adults undergoing strabismus surgery

AU - Hatt, Sarah R.

AU - Leske, David A.

AU - Holmes, Jonathan M

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Objective: To evaluate the responsiveness of 2 health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires, the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25), to changes in HRQOL after strabismus surgery. Design: Cohort study. Participants: We included 106 adults (aged 1884 years; median, 48.5) undergoing strabismus surgery, 80 (75%) with diplopia and 26 (25%) without diplopia. Methods: All participants completed AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires preoperatively and a median of 7 weeks (range, 413) postoperatively. Using predefined clinical criteria, postoperative outcomes were graded as either "success" (n = 65), "partial success" (n = 32), or "failure" (n = 9). Main Outcome Measures: For each questionnaire, mean composite and subscale scores (range, 0100; worst to best HRQOL) were calculated for each patient. Median change in scores pre- to postoperatively was compared for successes, partial successes, and failures, and the proportion of patients whose scores exceeded 95% limits of agreement was calculated. Results: Successfully aligned diplopic patients (n = 46) showed greater improvement than failures (n = 7) using both the AS-20 questionnaire (21.3 [quartiles 12.535.0] vs. 8.8 [3.812.5]; P = 0.002) and the VFQ-25 questionnaire (18.3 [8.626.1] vs 8.3 [0.813.5]; P = 0.02). Successfully aligned nondiplopic patients (n = 19) also showed greater improvement than failures (n = 2; AS-20, 23.8 [10.032.5] vs -3.1 [-10.0 to 3.8]; P = 0.05). In nondiplopic patients, changes on VFQ-25 were small but significantly greater for successes than failures (5.0 [0.010.1] vs -15.4 [-19.4 to -11.4]; P = 0.03). More successfully aligned patients showed improvement exceeding the 95% limits of agreement for AS-20 scores than VFQ-25 scores (67% vs 65% [P = 0.8] for diplopic patients and 63% vs 21% [P = 0.005] for nondiplopic patients). Conclusions: The AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires are responsive to improved HRQOL in adults undergoing successful strabismus surgery. Changes on VFQ-25 were smaller, particularly for nondiplopic strabismus. The AS-20 is more responsive than the VFQ-25 across the range of adult strabismus. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

AB - Objective: To evaluate the responsiveness of 2 health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires, the Adult Strabismus-20 (AS-20) and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25), to changes in HRQOL after strabismus surgery. Design: Cohort study. Participants: We included 106 adults (aged 1884 years; median, 48.5) undergoing strabismus surgery, 80 (75%) with diplopia and 26 (25%) without diplopia. Methods: All participants completed AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires preoperatively and a median of 7 weeks (range, 413) postoperatively. Using predefined clinical criteria, postoperative outcomes were graded as either "success" (n = 65), "partial success" (n = 32), or "failure" (n = 9). Main Outcome Measures: For each questionnaire, mean composite and subscale scores (range, 0100; worst to best HRQOL) were calculated for each patient. Median change in scores pre- to postoperatively was compared for successes, partial successes, and failures, and the proportion of patients whose scores exceeded 95% limits of agreement was calculated. Results: Successfully aligned diplopic patients (n = 46) showed greater improvement than failures (n = 7) using both the AS-20 questionnaire (21.3 [quartiles 12.535.0] vs. 8.8 [3.812.5]; P = 0.002) and the VFQ-25 questionnaire (18.3 [8.626.1] vs 8.3 [0.813.5]; P = 0.02). Successfully aligned nondiplopic patients (n = 19) also showed greater improvement than failures (n = 2; AS-20, 23.8 [10.032.5] vs -3.1 [-10.0 to 3.8]; P = 0.05). In nondiplopic patients, changes on VFQ-25 were small but significantly greater for successes than failures (5.0 [0.010.1] vs -15.4 [-19.4 to -11.4]; P = 0.03). More successfully aligned patients showed improvement exceeding the 95% limits of agreement for AS-20 scores than VFQ-25 scores (67% vs 65% [P = 0.8] for diplopic patients and 63% vs 21% [P = 0.005] for nondiplopic patients). Conclusions: The AS-20 and VFQ-25 questionnaires are responsive to improved HRQOL in adults undergoing successful strabismus surgery. Changes on VFQ-25 were smaller, particularly for nondiplopic strabismus. The AS-20 is more responsive than the VFQ-25 across the range of adult strabismus. Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649805268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649805268&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.042

DO - 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.042

M3 - Article

C2 - 20832120

AN - SCOPUS:78649805268

VL - 117

JO - Ophthalmology

JF - Ophthalmology

SN - 0161-6420

IS - 12

ER -