Responding to medical pluralism in practice: A principled ethical approach

Jon C Tilburt, Franklin G. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) raises a range of ethical issues for practicing clinicians. Principles of biomedical ethics define obligations of health care professionals, but applying principles in particular cases at the interface of CAM and biomedicine may be particularly challenging. "Recognition of medical pluralism"" can help clinicians' ethical deliberations related to CAM. Here we outline a 3-point practical approach to applying basic principles of biomedical ethics in light of medical pluralism: (1) inquiring about CAM use and the scientific evidence related to CAM, (2) acknowledging the health beliefs and practices of patients, and (3) accommodating diverse healing practices. Construed as such, recognition of medical pluralism encourages pragmatic willingness to examine the personal and cultural meaning associated with CAM use, the biases and assumptions of biomedicine, as well as the risk-benefit ratio of CAM practices. In this way, recognition of medical pluralism can help clinicians enhance patient care in a manner consistent with basic ethical principles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-494
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cultural Diversity
Complementary Therapies
Bioethics
Ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Responding to medical pluralism in practice : A principled ethical approach. / Tilburt, Jon C; Miller, Franklin G.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 5, 09.2007, p. 489-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d62fce90fd764fc6b743a76ac8600eb4,
title = "Responding to medical pluralism in practice: A principled ethical approach",
abstract = "The popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) raises a range of ethical issues for practicing clinicians. Principles of biomedical ethics define obligations of health care professionals, but applying principles in particular cases at the interface of CAM and biomedicine may be particularly challenging. {"}Recognition of medical pluralism{"}{"} can help clinicians' ethical deliberations related to CAM. Here we outline a 3-point practical approach to applying basic principles of biomedical ethics in light of medical pluralism: (1) inquiring about CAM use and the scientific evidence related to CAM, (2) acknowledging the health beliefs and practices of patients, and (3) accommodating diverse healing practices. Construed as such, recognition of medical pluralism encourages pragmatic willingness to examine the personal and cultural meaning associated with CAM use, the biases and assumptions of biomedicine, as well as the risk-benefit ratio of CAM practices. In this way, recognition of medical pluralism can help clinicians enhance patient care in a manner consistent with basic ethical principles.",
author = "Tilburt, {Jon C} and Miller, {Franklin G.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.060205",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "489--494",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responding to medical pluralism in practice

T2 - A principled ethical approach

AU - Tilburt, Jon C

AU - Miller, Franklin G.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - The popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) raises a range of ethical issues for practicing clinicians. Principles of biomedical ethics define obligations of health care professionals, but applying principles in particular cases at the interface of CAM and biomedicine may be particularly challenging. "Recognition of medical pluralism"" can help clinicians' ethical deliberations related to CAM. Here we outline a 3-point practical approach to applying basic principles of biomedical ethics in light of medical pluralism: (1) inquiring about CAM use and the scientific evidence related to CAM, (2) acknowledging the health beliefs and practices of patients, and (3) accommodating diverse healing practices. Construed as such, recognition of medical pluralism encourages pragmatic willingness to examine the personal and cultural meaning associated with CAM use, the biases and assumptions of biomedicine, as well as the risk-benefit ratio of CAM practices. In this way, recognition of medical pluralism can help clinicians enhance patient care in a manner consistent with basic ethical principles.

AB - The popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) raises a range of ethical issues for practicing clinicians. Principles of biomedical ethics define obligations of health care professionals, but applying principles in particular cases at the interface of CAM and biomedicine may be particularly challenging. "Recognition of medical pluralism"" can help clinicians' ethical deliberations related to CAM. Here we outline a 3-point practical approach to applying basic principles of biomedical ethics in light of medical pluralism: (1) inquiring about CAM use and the scientific evidence related to CAM, (2) acknowledging the health beliefs and practices of patients, and (3) accommodating diverse healing practices. Construed as such, recognition of medical pluralism encourages pragmatic willingness to examine the personal and cultural meaning associated with CAM use, the biases and assumptions of biomedicine, as well as the risk-benefit ratio of CAM practices. In this way, recognition of medical pluralism can help clinicians enhance patient care in a manner consistent with basic ethical principles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35348829697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35348829697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.060205

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.060205

M3 - Article

C2 - 17823467

AN - SCOPUS:35348829697

VL - 20

SP - 489

EP - 494

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 5

ER -