Resource Utilization in Emergency Department Patients with Known or Suspected Poisoning

Stephen Traub, Soroush Saghafian, Matthew R. Buras, M. Hamed Temkit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Previous work has shown poisoning-related emergency department (ED) visits are increasing, and these visits are resource-intensive. Little is known, however, about how resource utilization for patients with known or suspected poisoning differs from that of general ED patients. Methods: We reviewed 4 years of operational data at a single ED. We identified visits due to known or suspected poisoning (index cases), and paired them with time-matched controls. In the primary analysis, we compared the groups with respect to a broad array of resource utilization characteristics. In a secondary analysis, we performed the same comparison after excluding patients ultimately transferred to a psychiatric facility. Results: There were 405 index cases and 802 controls in the primary analysis, and 374 index cases and 741 controls in the secondary analysis. In the primary/secondary analyses, patients with known or suspected poisoning had longer ED lengths of stay in minutes (370 vs. 232/295 vs. 234), higher rates of laboratory results per patient (40.4 vs. 26.8/39.6 vs. 26.8), greater administration of intravenous medications and fluids per patient (2.0 vs. 1.6/2.1 vs. 1.6), higher rates of transfer to a psychiatric facility (7.7 vs. 0.2%/not applicable), and higher rates of both admission (40.2 vs. 32.8/43.6 vs. 33.1%) and admission to an advanced care bed (21.5 vs. 7.6/23.3 vs. 7.8%). Patients with known or suspected poisoning had lower rates of imaging per patient, for both plain radiographs (0.4 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5) and advanced imaging studies (0.3 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5). Conclusions: ED patients with known or suspected poisoning are more resource intensive than general ED patients. These results may have implications for both resource allocation (particularly for departments that might see a high volume of such patients) and ED operations management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)238-244
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Medical Toxicology
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Poisoning
Hospital Emergency Service
Imaging techniques
Resource allocation
Fluids
Psychiatry
Resource Allocation
Intravenous Administration
Length of Stay

Keywords

  • Emergency department
  • Poisoning
  • Resource utilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Resource Utilization in Emergency Department Patients with Known or Suspected Poisoning. / Traub, Stephen; Saghafian, Soroush; Buras, Matthew R.; Temkit, M. Hamed.

In: Journal of Medical Toxicology, Vol. 13, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 238-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Traub, Stephen ; Saghafian, Soroush ; Buras, Matthew R. ; Temkit, M. Hamed. / Resource Utilization in Emergency Department Patients with Known or Suspected Poisoning. In: Journal of Medical Toxicology. 2017 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 238-244.
@article{f0c9896bff3e4d31b84dfaf44dac1982,
title = "Resource Utilization in Emergency Department Patients with Known or Suspected Poisoning",
abstract = "Introduction: Previous work has shown poisoning-related emergency department (ED) visits are increasing, and these visits are resource-intensive. Little is known, however, about how resource utilization for patients with known or suspected poisoning differs from that of general ED patients. Methods: We reviewed 4 years of operational data at a single ED. We identified visits due to known or suspected poisoning (index cases), and paired them with time-matched controls. In the primary analysis, we compared the groups with respect to a broad array of resource utilization characteristics. In a secondary analysis, we performed the same comparison after excluding patients ultimately transferred to a psychiatric facility. Results: There were 405 index cases and 802 controls in the primary analysis, and 374 index cases and 741 controls in the secondary analysis. In the primary/secondary analyses, patients with known or suspected poisoning had longer ED lengths of stay in minutes (370 vs. 232/295 vs. 234), higher rates of laboratory results per patient (40.4 vs. 26.8/39.6 vs. 26.8), greater administration of intravenous medications and fluids per patient (2.0 vs. 1.6/2.1 vs. 1.6), higher rates of transfer to a psychiatric facility (7.7 vs. 0.2{\%}/not applicable), and higher rates of both admission (40.2 vs. 32.8/43.6 vs. 33.1{\%}) and admission to an advanced care bed (21.5 vs. 7.6/23.3 vs. 7.8{\%}). Patients with known or suspected poisoning had lower rates of imaging per patient, for both plain radiographs (0.4 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5) and advanced imaging studies (0.3 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5). Conclusions: ED patients with known or suspected poisoning are more resource intensive than general ED patients. These results may have implications for both resource allocation (particularly for departments that might see a high volume of such patients) and ED operations management.",
keywords = "Emergency department, Poisoning, Resource utilization",
author = "Stephen Traub and Soroush Saghafian and Buras, {Matthew R.} and Temkit, {M. Hamed}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13181-017-0619-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "238--244",
journal = "Journal of Medical Toxicology",
issn = "1556-9039",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resource Utilization in Emergency Department Patients with Known or Suspected Poisoning

AU - Traub, Stephen

AU - Saghafian, Soroush

AU - Buras, Matthew R.

AU - Temkit, M. Hamed

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Introduction: Previous work has shown poisoning-related emergency department (ED) visits are increasing, and these visits are resource-intensive. Little is known, however, about how resource utilization for patients with known or suspected poisoning differs from that of general ED patients. Methods: We reviewed 4 years of operational data at a single ED. We identified visits due to known or suspected poisoning (index cases), and paired them with time-matched controls. In the primary analysis, we compared the groups with respect to a broad array of resource utilization characteristics. In a secondary analysis, we performed the same comparison after excluding patients ultimately transferred to a psychiatric facility. Results: There were 405 index cases and 802 controls in the primary analysis, and 374 index cases and 741 controls in the secondary analysis. In the primary/secondary analyses, patients with known or suspected poisoning had longer ED lengths of stay in minutes (370 vs. 232/295 vs. 234), higher rates of laboratory results per patient (40.4 vs. 26.8/39.6 vs. 26.8), greater administration of intravenous medications and fluids per patient (2.0 vs. 1.6/2.1 vs. 1.6), higher rates of transfer to a psychiatric facility (7.7 vs. 0.2%/not applicable), and higher rates of both admission (40.2 vs. 32.8/43.6 vs. 33.1%) and admission to an advanced care bed (21.5 vs. 7.6/23.3 vs. 7.8%). Patients with known or suspected poisoning had lower rates of imaging per patient, for both plain radiographs (0.4 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5) and advanced imaging studies (0.3 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5). Conclusions: ED patients with known or suspected poisoning are more resource intensive than general ED patients. These results may have implications for both resource allocation (particularly for departments that might see a high volume of such patients) and ED operations management.

AB - Introduction: Previous work has shown poisoning-related emergency department (ED) visits are increasing, and these visits are resource-intensive. Little is known, however, about how resource utilization for patients with known or suspected poisoning differs from that of general ED patients. Methods: We reviewed 4 years of operational data at a single ED. We identified visits due to known or suspected poisoning (index cases), and paired them with time-matched controls. In the primary analysis, we compared the groups with respect to a broad array of resource utilization characteristics. In a secondary analysis, we performed the same comparison after excluding patients ultimately transferred to a psychiatric facility. Results: There were 405 index cases and 802 controls in the primary analysis, and 374 index cases and 741 controls in the secondary analysis. In the primary/secondary analyses, patients with known or suspected poisoning had longer ED lengths of stay in minutes (370 vs. 232/295 vs. 234), higher rates of laboratory results per patient (40.4 vs. 26.8/39.6 vs. 26.8), greater administration of intravenous medications and fluids per patient (2.0 vs. 1.6/2.1 vs. 1.6), higher rates of transfer to a psychiatric facility (7.7 vs. 0.2%/not applicable), and higher rates of both admission (40.2 vs. 32.8/43.6 vs. 33.1%) and admission to an advanced care bed (21.5 vs. 7.6/23.3 vs. 7.8%). Patients with known or suspected poisoning had lower rates of imaging per patient, for both plain radiographs (0.4 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5) and advanced imaging studies (0.3 vs. 0.5/0.4 vs. 0.5). Conclusions: ED patients with known or suspected poisoning are more resource intensive than general ED patients. These results may have implications for both resource allocation (particularly for departments that might see a high volume of such patients) and ED operations management.

KW - Emergency department

KW - Poisoning

KW - Resource utilization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020110418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020110418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13181-017-0619-3

DO - 10.1007/s13181-017-0619-3

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 238

EP - 244

JO - Journal of Medical Toxicology

JF - Journal of Medical Toxicology

SN - 1556-9039

IS - 3

ER -