Resource utilization and procedure parameters for the Stretta procedure: Comparison with endoscopic ultrasonography and colonoscopy

Herbert C. Wolfsen, Lois Hemminger, Mark E. Stark, Sami R. Achem, David S. Loeb, Timothy A. Woodward, Kenneth R. DeVault

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: No data are available regarding resource utilization of the Stretta procedure and its impact on endoscopy units in comparison with other endoscopy procedures. Methods: This observational cohort study compared the demographic data and procedural parameters for our first 13 cases undergoing the Stretta procedure, with similar endoscopic colonoscopy and ultrasonography (EUS) cases. Results: The characteristics of the patients were similar among these groups. The patients undergoing the Stretta procedure required significantly more sedative medication than those undergoing colonoscopy or EUS. The Stretta procedure time and recovery time were significantly longer than the colonoscopy procedure time and recovery time. The Stretta procedure time was also significantly longer than the EUS procedure time, but the Stretta recovery time was not significantly longer than the EUS recovery time. Conclusions: Although this study is small and not randomized, it provides useful information regarding how endoscopic procedures compare with one another. Furthermore, these findings have implications for determining endoscopy unit staffing, work equivalency, and appropriate reimbursement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-294
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A
Volume13
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Fingerprint

Endosonography
Colonoscopy
Endoscopy
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Observational Studies
Cohort Studies
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Wolfsen, H. C., Hemminger, L., Stark, M. E., Achem, S. R., Loeb, D. S., Woodward, T. A., & DeVault, K. R. (2003). Resource utilization and procedure parameters for the Stretta procedure: Comparison with endoscopic ultrasonography and colonoscopy. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A, 13(5), 291-294.

Resource utilization and procedure parameters for the Stretta procedure : Comparison with endoscopic ultrasonography and colonoscopy. / Wolfsen, Herbert C.; Hemminger, Lois; Stark, Mark E.; Achem, Sami R.; Loeb, David S.; Woodward, Timothy A.; DeVault, Kenneth R.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A, Vol. 13, No. 5, 10.2003, p. 291-294.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wolfsen, Herbert C. ; Hemminger, Lois ; Stark, Mark E. ; Achem, Sami R. ; Loeb, David S. ; Woodward, Timothy A. ; DeVault, Kenneth R. / Resource utilization and procedure parameters for the Stretta procedure : Comparison with endoscopic ultrasonography and colonoscopy. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A. 2003 ; Vol. 13, No. 5. pp. 291-294.
@article{6da4eb25e509432780e93d83207d5416,
title = "Resource utilization and procedure parameters for the Stretta procedure: Comparison with endoscopic ultrasonography and colonoscopy",
abstract = "Background: No data are available regarding resource utilization of the Stretta procedure and its impact on endoscopy units in comparison with other endoscopy procedures. Methods: This observational cohort study compared the demographic data and procedural parameters for our first 13 cases undergoing the Stretta procedure, with similar endoscopic colonoscopy and ultrasonography (EUS) cases. Results: The characteristics of the patients were similar among these groups. The patients undergoing the Stretta procedure required significantly more sedative medication than those undergoing colonoscopy or EUS. The Stretta procedure time and recovery time were significantly longer than the colonoscopy procedure time and recovery time. The Stretta procedure time was also significantly longer than the EUS procedure time, but the Stretta recovery time was not significantly longer than the EUS recovery time. Conclusions: Although this study is small and not randomized, it provides useful information regarding how endoscopic procedures compare with one another. Furthermore, these findings have implications for determining endoscopy unit staffing, work equivalency, and appropriate reimbursement.",
author = "Wolfsen, {Herbert C.} and Lois Hemminger and Stark, {Mark E.} and Achem, {Sami R.} and Loeb, {David S.} and Woodward, {Timothy A.} and DeVault, {Kenneth R.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "291--294",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resource utilization and procedure parameters for the Stretta procedure

T2 - Comparison with endoscopic ultrasonography and colonoscopy

AU - Wolfsen, Herbert C.

AU - Hemminger, Lois

AU - Stark, Mark E.

AU - Achem, Sami R.

AU - Loeb, David S.

AU - Woodward, Timothy A.

AU - DeVault, Kenneth R.

PY - 2003/10

Y1 - 2003/10

N2 - Background: No data are available regarding resource utilization of the Stretta procedure and its impact on endoscopy units in comparison with other endoscopy procedures. Methods: This observational cohort study compared the demographic data and procedural parameters for our first 13 cases undergoing the Stretta procedure, with similar endoscopic colonoscopy and ultrasonography (EUS) cases. Results: The characteristics of the patients were similar among these groups. The patients undergoing the Stretta procedure required significantly more sedative medication than those undergoing colonoscopy or EUS. The Stretta procedure time and recovery time were significantly longer than the colonoscopy procedure time and recovery time. The Stretta procedure time was also significantly longer than the EUS procedure time, but the Stretta recovery time was not significantly longer than the EUS recovery time. Conclusions: Although this study is small and not randomized, it provides useful information regarding how endoscopic procedures compare with one another. Furthermore, these findings have implications for determining endoscopy unit staffing, work equivalency, and appropriate reimbursement.

AB - Background: No data are available regarding resource utilization of the Stretta procedure and its impact on endoscopy units in comparison with other endoscopy procedures. Methods: This observational cohort study compared the demographic data and procedural parameters for our first 13 cases undergoing the Stretta procedure, with similar endoscopic colonoscopy and ultrasonography (EUS) cases. Results: The characteristics of the patients were similar among these groups. The patients undergoing the Stretta procedure required significantly more sedative medication than those undergoing colonoscopy or EUS. The Stretta procedure time and recovery time were significantly longer than the colonoscopy procedure time and recovery time. The Stretta procedure time was also significantly longer than the EUS procedure time, but the Stretta recovery time was not significantly longer than the EUS recovery time. Conclusions: Although this study is small and not randomized, it provides useful information regarding how endoscopic procedures compare with one another. Furthermore, these findings have implications for determining endoscopy unit staffing, work equivalency, and appropriate reimbursement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0141889072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0141889072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14617384

AN - SCOPUS:0141889072

VL - 13

SP - 291

EP - 294

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 5

ER -