TY - JOUR
T1 - Resilience in Vulnerable Populations With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension
T2 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Pesantes, M. Amalia
AU - Lazo-Porras, María
AU - Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain
AU - Ávila-Ramírez, Jaime R.
AU - Caycho, María
AU - Villamonte, Georgina Y.
AU - Sánchez-Pérez, Grecia P.
AU - Málaga, Germán
AU - Bernabé-Ortiz, Antonio
AU - Miranda, J. Jaime
N1 - Funding Information:
M.A.P., M.L-P., A.B-O., G.M., and J.J.M. are with the CRONICAS Centre of Excellence in Chronic Diseases at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under contract No. HHSN268200900033C. M.A.P. is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONCYTEC). M.L-P. is supported by Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health (R21TW009982). A.B-O. is a Wellcome Trust Research Training Fellow in Public Health and Tropical Medicine (103994/Z/14/Z). J.J.M. is supported by Fogarty International Centre (R21TW009982), Grand Challenges Canada (0335-04), International Development Research Centre Canada (106887-001), Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI CRN3036), Medical Research Council UK (M007405), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U01HL114180), and National Institutes of Mental Health (U19MH098780). The funders had no role in the decision to publish or in preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Canadian Cardiovascular Society.
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - Background: Patients with chronic conditions and limited access to health care experience stressful challenges resulting from the burden of managing both their conditions and their daily life demands. Resilience provides a mechanism of adapting to stressful experiences. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the evidence about interventions to enhance resiliency in managing hypertension or type 2 diabetes in vulnerable populations and to assess the efficacy of these interventions on clinical outcomes. Methods: We searched multiple databases from early inception through February 2015 including randomized controlled trials that enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes or hypertension. All interventions that targeted resilience in vulnerable populations were included. Data were synthesized to describe the characteristics and efficacy of resiliency interventions. We pooled the total effects by calculating standardized mean difference using the random-effects model. Results: The final search yielded 17 studies. All studies were conducted in the United States and generally targeted minority participants. Resiliency interventions used diverse strategies; discussion groups or workshops were the most common approach. Conclusions: Interventions aimed at enhancing the resiliency of patients from vulnerable groups are diverse. Outcomes were not fully conclusive. There was some evidence that resiliency interventions had a positive effect on hemoglobin A1C levels but not blood pressure. The incorporation of resiliency-oriented interventions into the arsenal of preventing and managing chronic conditions appears to be an opportunity that remains to be better investigated and exploited, and there is need to pursue further understanding of the core components of any intervention that claims to enhance resilience.
AB - Background: Patients with chronic conditions and limited access to health care experience stressful challenges resulting from the burden of managing both their conditions and their daily life demands. Resilience provides a mechanism of adapting to stressful experiences. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the evidence about interventions to enhance resiliency in managing hypertension or type 2 diabetes in vulnerable populations and to assess the efficacy of these interventions on clinical outcomes. Methods: We searched multiple databases from early inception through February 2015 including randomized controlled trials that enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes or hypertension. All interventions that targeted resilience in vulnerable populations were included. Data were synthesized to describe the characteristics and efficacy of resiliency interventions. We pooled the total effects by calculating standardized mean difference using the random-effects model. Results: The final search yielded 17 studies. All studies were conducted in the United States and generally targeted minority participants. Resiliency interventions used diverse strategies; discussion groups or workshops were the most common approach. Conclusions: Interventions aimed at enhancing the resiliency of patients from vulnerable groups are diverse. Outcomes were not fully conclusive. There was some evidence that resiliency interventions had a positive effect on hemoglobin A1C levels but not blood pressure. The incorporation of resiliency-oriented interventions into the arsenal of preventing and managing chronic conditions appears to be an opportunity that remains to be better investigated and exploited, and there is need to pursue further understanding of the core components of any intervention that claims to enhance resilience.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940796946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940796946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.06.003
DO - 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.06.003
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26239007
AN - SCOPUS:84940796946
SN - 0828-282X
VL - 31
SP - 1180
EP - 1188
JO - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
JF - Canadian Journal of Cardiology
IS - 9
ER -