Reproducibility of 3 histologic classifications and 3 staging systems for thymic epithelial neoplasms and its effect on prognosis

Anja Roden, Eunhee S. Yi, Sarah M. Jenkins, Kelly K. Edwards, Janis L. Donovan, Jean E. Lewis, Stephen D. Cassivi, Randolph Stuart Marks, Yolanda Isabel Garces, Marie Christine Aubry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data regarding the prognostic significance of the histopathologic classifications of thymic epithelial neoplasms are contradictory, perhaps reflecting issues in reproducibility. We studied the effect of reproducibility of 3 histopathologic classifications on prognosis and investigated the interobserver agreement on invasion and its effect on staging and prognosis. A total of 456 patients who underwent surgery for thymic epithelial neoplasm at Mayo Clinic Rochester (1942 to 2008) were staged (modified Masaoka, proposed Moran, proposed IASLC/ITMIG) and independently classified by 3 thoracic pathologists (World Health Organization, proposed Suster & Moran [S&M], and Bernatz). Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial for all histopathologic classifications (k values: 0.65, 0.52, 0.74 for World Health Organization, Bernatz, and S&M, respectively). All histopathologic classifications were significant for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (all reviewers). If adjusted for Masaoka, only Bernatz classification for one reviewer and all histopathologic classifications for another reviewer were significant for OS. Interobserver agreement for invasion was substantial (k=0.61) and almost perfect for Masaoka, Moran, and IASLC/ ITMIG stage (k values: 0.85, 0.81, and 0.92, respectively). The correlation coefficient for Masaoka and Moran staging was 0.93. Masaoka and IASLC/ITMIG staging were significant for OS and DFS (all reviewers). If adjusted for any histopathologic classification, Masaoka was significant for OS and DFS (all reviewers). In conclusion, reproducibility of histopathologic classifications has some effect on outcome. S&M is the most reproducible classification. Reproducibility of invasion has no effect on the prognostic value of staging. Masaoka, Moran, and IASLC/ITMIG staging are almost perfectly reproducible. The strong correlation between Masaoka and Moran staging suggests similar prognostic strength.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)427-441
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgical Pathology
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 30 2015

Fingerprint

Thymus Neoplasms
Glandular and Epithelial Neoplasms
Disease-Free Survival
Survival
Thorax

Keywords

  • interobserver variability
  • modified Masaoka staging
  • Moran staging
  • prognosis
  • thymoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Surgery

Cite this

Reproducibility of 3 histologic classifications and 3 staging systems for thymic epithelial neoplasms and its effect on prognosis. / Roden, Anja; Yi, Eunhee S.; Jenkins, Sarah M.; Edwards, Kelly K.; Donovan, Janis L.; Lewis, Jean E.; Cassivi, Stephen D.; Marks, Randolph Stuart; Garces, Yolanda Isabel; Aubry, Marie Christine.

In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Vol. 39, No. 4, 30.03.2015, p. 427-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roden, Anja ; Yi, Eunhee S. ; Jenkins, Sarah M. ; Edwards, Kelly K. ; Donovan, Janis L. ; Lewis, Jean E. ; Cassivi, Stephen D. ; Marks, Randolph Stuart ; Garces, Yolanda Isabel ; Aubry, Marie Christine. / Reproducibility of 3 histologic classifications and 3 staging systems for thymic epithelial neoplasms and its effect on prognosis. In: American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2015 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 427-441.
@article{6252c99a8ed044a889e6b82ef29a7309,
title = "Reproducibility of 3 histologic classifications and 3 staging systems for thymic epithelial neoplasms and its effect on prognosis",
abstract = "Data regarding the prognostic significance of the histopathologic classifications of thymic epithelial neoplasms are contradictory, perhaps reflecting issues in reproducibility. We studied the effect of reproducibility of 3 histopathologic classifications on prognosis and investigated the interobserver agreement on invasion and its effect on staging and prognosis. A total of 456 patients who underwent surgery for thymic epithelial neoplasm at Mayo Clinic Rochester (1942 to 2008) were staged (modified Masaoka, proposed Moran, proposed IASLC/ITMIG) and independently classified by 3 thoracic pathologists (World Health Organization, proposed Suster & Moran [S&M], and Bernatz). Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial for all histopathologic classifications (k values: 0.65, 0.52, 0.74 for World Health Organization, Bernatz, and S&M, respectively). All histopathologic classifications were significant for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (all reviewers). If adjusted for Masaoka, only Bernatz classification for one reviewer and all histopathologic classifications for another reviewer were significant for OS. Interobserver agreement for invasion was substantial (k=0.61) and almost perfect for Masaoka, Moran, and IASLC/ ITMIG stage (k values: 0.85, 0.81, and 0.92, respectively). The correlation coefficient for Masaoka and Moran staging was 0.93. Masaoka and IASLC/ITMIG staging were significant for OS and DFS (all reviewers). If adjusted for any histopathologic classification, Masaoka was significant for OS and DFS (all reviewers). In conclusion, reproducibility of histopathologic classifications has some effect on outcome. S&M is the most reproducible classification. Reproducibility of invasion has no effect on the prognostic value of staging. Masaoka, Moran, and IASLC/ITMIG staging are almost perfectly reproducible. The strong correlation between Masaoka and Moran staging suggests similar prognostic strength.",
keywords = "interobserver variability, modified Masaoka staging, Moran staging, prognosis, thymoma",
author = "Anja Roden and Yi, {Eunhee S.} and Jenkins, {Sarah M.} and Edwards, {Kelly K.} and Donovan, {Janis L.} and Lewis, {Jean E.} and Cassivi, {Stephen D.} and Marks, {Randolph Stuart} and Garces, {Yolanda Isabel} and Aubry, {Marie Christine}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1097/PAS.0000000000000391",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "427--441",
journal = "American Journal of Surgical Pathology",
issn = "0147-5185",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility of 3 histologic classifications and 3 staging systems for thymic epithelial neoplasms and its effect on prognosis

AU - Roden, Anja

AU - Yi, Eunhee S.

AU - Jenkins, Sarah M.

AU - Edwards, Kelly K.

AU - Donovan, Janis L.

AU - Lewis, Jean E.

AU - Cassivi, Stephen D.

AU - Marks, Randolph Stuart

AU - Garces, Yolanda Isabel

AU - Aubry, Marie Christine

PY - 2015/3/30

Y1 - 2015/3/30

N2 - Data regarding the prognostic significance of the histopathologic classifications of thymic epithelial neoplasms are contradictory, perhaps reflecting issues in reproducibility. We studied the effect of reproducibility of 3 histopathologic classifications on prognosis and investigated the interobserver agreement on invasion and its effect on staging and prognosis. A total of 456 patients who underwent surgery for thymic epithelial neoplasm at Mayo Clinic Rochester (1942 to 2008) were staged (modified Masaoka, proposed Moran, proposed IASLC/ITMIG) and independently classified by 3 thoracic pathologists (World Health Organization, proposed Suster & Moran [S&M], and Bernatz). Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial for all histopathologic classifications (k values: 0.65, 0.52, 0.74 for World Health Organization, Bernatz, and S&M, respectively). All histopathologic classifications were significant for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (all reviewers). If adjusted for Masaoka, only Bernatz classification for one reviewer and all histopathologic classifications for another reviewer were significant for OS. Interobserver agreement for invasion was substantial (k=0.61) and almost perfect for Masaoka, Moran, and IASLC/ ITMIG stage (k values: 0.85, 0.81, and 0.92, respectively). The correlation coefficient for Masaoka and Moran staging was 0.93. Masaoka and IASLC/ITMIG staging were significant for OS and DFS (all reviewers). If adjusted for any histopathologic classification, Masaoka was significant for OS and DFS (all reviewers). In conclusion, reproducibility of histopathologic classifications has some effect on outcome. S&M is the most reproducible classification. Reproducibility of invasion has no effect on the prognostic value of staging. Masaoka, Moran, and IASLC/ITMIG staging are almost perfectly reproducible. The strong correlation between Masaoka and Moran staging suggests similar prognostic strength.

AB - Data regarding the prognostic significance of the histopathologic classifications of thymic epithelial neoplasms are contradictory, perhaps reflecting issues in reproducibility. We studied the effect of reproducibility of 3 histopathologic classifications on prognosis and investigated the interobserver agreement on invasion and its effect on staging and prognosis. A total of 456 patients who underwent surgery for thymic epithelial neoplasm at Mayo Clinic Rochester (1942 to 2008) were staged (modified Masaoka, proposed Moran, proposed IASLC/ITMIG) and independently classified by 3 thoracic pathologists (World Health Organization, proposed Suster & Moran [S&M], and Bernatz). Interobserver agreement was moderate to substantial for all histopathologic classifications (k values: 0.65, 0.52, 0.74 for World Health Organization, Bernatz, and S&M, respectively). All histopathologic classifications were significant for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (all reviewers). If adjusted for Masaoka, only Bernatz classification for one reviewer and all histopathologic classifications for another reviewer were significant for OS. Interobserver agreement for invasion was substantial (k=0.61) and almost perfect for Masaoka, Moran, and IASLC/ ITMIG stage (k values: 0.85, 0.81, and 0.92, respectively). The correlation coefficient for Masaoka and Moran staging was 0.93. Masaoka and IASLC/ITMIG staging were significant for OS and DFS (all reviewers). If adjusted for any histopathologic classification, Masaoka was significant for OS and DFS (all reviewers). In conclusion, reproducibility of histopathologic classifications has some effect on outcome. S&M is the most reproducible classification. Reproducibility of invasion has no effect on the prognostic value of staging. Masaoka, Moran, and IASLC/ITMIG staging are almost perfectly reproducible. The strong correlation between Masaoka and Moran staging suggests similar prognostic strength.

KW - interobserver variability

KW - modified Masaoka staging

KW - Moran staging

KW - prognosis

KW - thymoma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925939438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925939438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000391

DO - 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000391

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 427

EP - 441

JO - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Surgical Pathology

SN - 0147-5185

IS - 4

ER -