Reproducibility and Precision of CT Scans to Evaluate Tibial Component Rotation

Derek F. Amanatullah, Matthieu P. Ollivier, Graham D. Pallante, Matthew Abdel, Henry D. Clarke, Tad M. Mabry, Michael J. Taunton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Component rotation likely plays a greater role on the survivorship and outcomes of total knee arthroplasties than is currently known. Our goal was to evaluate the precision, interobserver reliability, and intrarater reliability of tibial component rotation as measured by computed tomography (CT) scan, regardless of measurement technique. Methods: Three fellowship-trained, academic arthroplasty surgeons independently measured tibial component rotation on CT scans of 62 total knee arthroplasties using their methods of choice. Measurements were repeated at least 2 weeks after the initial measurement. The precision of the measurements was assessed using a formal 8-step protocol as the gold standard. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate precision, interobserver agreement, and intrarater reliability. Results: The interobserver agreement between the 3 surgeons for tibial component rotation was also moderate (ICC = 0.52). The intrarater reliability of tibial rotation was excellent (ICC = 0.81). Comparison of surgeons' measurement to a validated gold standard revealed only moderate precision for tibial component rotation (ICC = 0.64). Conclusion: Practicing surgeons measuring tibial rotation were internally consistent, but failed to demonstrate satisfactory precision and interobserver agreement. We support the adoption of standardized criteria for the measurement of tibial component rotation on CT scans.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 19 2016

Fingerprint

Tomography
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Arthroplasty
Survival Rate
Surgeons

Keywords

  • CT scan
  • Interobserver agreement
  • Intrarater reliability
  • Precision
  • Tibial component rotation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Amanatullah, D. F., Ollivier, M. P., Pallante, G. D., Abdel, M., Clarke, H. D., Mabry, T. M., & Taunton, M. J. (Accepted/In press). Reproducibility and Precision of CT Scans to Evaluate Tibial Component Rotation. Journal of Arthroplasty. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.040

Reproducibility and Precision of CT Scans to Evaluate Tibial Component Rotation. / Amanatullah, Derek F.; Ollivier, Matthieu P.; Pallante, Graham D.; Abdel, Matthew; Clarke, Henry D.; Mabry, Tad M.; Taunton, Michael J.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, 19.07.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Amanatullah, Derek F. ; Ollivier, Matthieu P. ; Pallante, Graham D. ; Abdel, Matthew ; Clarke, Henry D. ; Mabry, Tad M. ; Taunton, Michael J. / Reproducibility and Precision of CT Scans to Evaluate Tibial Component Rotation. In: Journal of Arthroplasty. 2016.
@article{438b9fdef4ca4d588488f607a8af6455,
title = "Reproducibility and Precision of CT Scans to Evaluate Tibial Component Rotation",
abstract = "Background: Component rotation likely plays a greater role on the survivorship and outcomes of total knee arthroplasties than is currently known. Our goal was to evaluate the precision, interobserver reliability, and intrarater reliability of tibial component rotation as measured by computed tomography (CT) scan, regardless of measurement technique. Methods: Three fellowship-trained, academic arthroplasty surgeons independently measured tibial component rotation on CT scans of 62 total knee arthroplasties using their methods of choice. Measurements were repeated at least 2 weeks after the initial measurement. The precision of the measurements was assessed using a formal 8-step protocol as the gold standard. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate precision, interobserver agreement, and intrarater reliability. Results: The interobserver agreement between the 3 surgeons for tibial component rotation was also moderate (ICC = 0.52). The intrarater reliability of tibial rotation was excellent (ICC = 0.81). Comparison of surgeons' measurement to a validated gold standard revealed only moderate precision for tibial component rotation (ICC = 0.64). Conclusion: Practicing surgeons measuring tibial rotation were internally consistent, but failed to demonstrate satisfactory precision and interobserver agreement. We support the adoption of standardized criteria for the measurement of tibial component rotation on CT scans.",
keywords = "CT scan, Interobserver agreement, Intrarater reliability, Precision, Tibial component rotation",
author = "Amanatullah, {Derek F.} and Ollivier, {Matthieu P.} and Pallante, {Graham D.} and Matthew Abdel and Clarke, {Henry D.} and Mabry, {Tad M.} and Taunton, {Michael J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.040",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproducibility and Precision of CT Scans to Evaluate Tibial Component Rotation

AU - Amanatullah, Derek F.

AU - Ollivier, Matthieu P.

AU - Pallante, Graham D.

AU - Abdel, Matthew

AU - Clarke, Henry D.

AU - Mabry, Tad M.

AU - Taunton, Michael J.

PY - 2016/7/19

Y1 - 2016/7/19

N2 - Background: Component rotation likely plays a greater role on the survivorship and outcomes of total knee arthroplasties than is currently known. Our goal was to evaluate the precision, interobserver reliability, and intrarater reliability of tibial component rotation as measured by computed tomography (CT) scan, regardless of measurement technique. Methods: Three fellowship-trained, academic arthroplasty surgeons independently measured tibial component rotation on CT scans of 62 total knee arthroplasties using their methods of choice. Measurements were repeated at least 2 weeks after the initial measurement. The precision of the measurements was assessed using a formal 8-step protocol as the gold standard. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate precision, interobserver agreement, and intrarater reliability. Results: The interobserver agreement between the 3 surgeons for tibial component rotation was also moderate (ICC = 0.52). The intrarater reliability of tibial rotation was excellent (ICC = 0.81). Comparison of surgeons' measurement to a validated gold standard revealed only moderate precision for tibial component rotation (ICC = 0.64). Conclusion: Practicing surgeons measuring tibial rotation were internally consistent, but failed to demonstrate satisfactory precision and interobserver agreement. We support the adoption of standardized criteria for the measurement of tibial component rotation on CT scans.

AB - Background: Component rotation likely plays a greater role on the survivorship and outcomes of total knee arthroplasties than is currently known. Our goal was to evaluate the precision, interobserver reliability, and intrarater reliability of tibial component rotation as measured by computed tomography (CT) scan, regardless of measurement technique. Methods: Three fellowship-trained, academic arthroplasty surgeons independently measured tibial component rotation on CT scans of 62 total knee arthroplasties using their methods of choice. Measurements were repeated at least 2 weeks after the initial measurement. The precision of the measurements was assessed using a formal 8-step protocol as the gold standard. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to evaluate precision, interobserver agreement, and intrarater reliability. Results: The interobserver agreement between the 3 surgeons for tibial component rotation was also moderate (ICC = 0.52). The intrarater reliability of tibial rotation was excellent (ICC = 0.81). Comparison of surgeons' measurement to a validated gold standard revealed only moderate precision for tibial component rotation (ICC = 0.64). Conclusion: Practicing surgeons measuring tibial rotation were internally consistent, but failed to demonstrate satisfactory precision and interobserver agreement. We support the adoption of standardized criteria for the measurement of tibial component rotation on CT scans.

KW - CT scan

KW - Interobserver agreement

KW - Intrarater reliability

KW - Precision

KW - Tibial component rotation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018646184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018646184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.040

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.040

M3 - Article

C2 - 28434699

AN - SCOPUS:85018646184

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

ER -