Report on The Society for Fetal Urology panel discussion on the selection criteria and intervention for fetal bladder outlet obstruction

M. K. Farrugia, M. C. Braun, C. A. Peters, Rodrigo Ruano, C. D. Herndon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction The Society for Fetal Urology panel section at the 2016 Fall Congress featured a multidisciplinary discussion on appropriate patient selection, the conservative versus surgical management, and postnatal renal outcome of fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO). Selection criteria for intervention Rodrigo Ruano shared his experience of prenatal intervention, presenting the outcome of 111 fetuses with severe LUTO treated with vesicoamniotic shunting (VAS) (n = 16), cystoscopy (n = 34) or no intervention (n = 61) in a non-randomized series. Multivariate analysis at the 6-month follow-up suggested a significantly higher probability of survival with fetal intervention versus no intervention. A clear trend for normal renal function was present in the fetal cystoscopy group, but not in the VAS group. In cases in which there was a postnatal diagnosis of posterior urethral valves (n = 57), fetal cystoscopy was effective in improving both the 6-month survival rate and renal function, while VAS was associated with an improvement in the 6-month survival rate. In an attempt to better define which fetuses would benefit from intervention, Michael Braun explained the proposed LUTO classification system that incorporates: (1) fetal urinary biomarkers of renal injury; (2) amniotic fluid levels as a surrogate for the severity of obstruction; and (3) imaging studies to identify signs of renal dysplastic or cystic changes. Intervention was not recommended in patients at low risk of either renal disease or pulmonary hypoplasia (Stage 1). Vesicoamniotic shunting was performed in patients at high risk of either progressive renal injury or pulmonary hypoplasia without evidence of severe pre-existing renal damage (Stage 2). For those patients, who at the time of evaluation had evidence of severe renal disease (Stage 3), fetal intervention was individualized and often based on bladder capacity and bladder refilling after vesicocentesis. He went on to present the nephrologic outcome of fetuses managed over the last 3 years utilizing the selection criteria. Craig Peters supported the concept of selective criteria and discussed the cautious viewpoint, namely: (1) the procedure may be unnecessary, as it is possible for patients to do well, in spite of severe prenatal obstruction; and (2) the risk of giving partial treatment by allowing the baby to survive to delivery with the daunting postnatal journey of renal and pulmonary insufficiency. Conclusion Standardized patient selection utilizing a staging system is undoubtedly the way forward and will enable comparable long-term renal and bladder functional outcome studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-351
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pediatric Urology
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

Urinary Bladder Neck Obstruction
Urology
Patient Selection
Kidney
Cystoscopy
Fetus
Urinary Tract
Urinary Bladder
Survival Rate
Lung Injury
Amniotic Fluid
Lung Diseases
Renal Insufficiency
Multivariate Analysis
Biomarkers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Congenital bladder outlet obstruction
  • Fetal cystoscopy
  • Fetal intervention
  • Lower urinary tract obstruction
  • Posterior urethral valves
  • Vesicoamniotic shunting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Urology

Cite this

Report on The Society for Fetal Urology panel discussion on the selection criteria and intervention for fetal bladder outlet obstruction. / Farrugia, M. K.; Braun, M. C.; Peters, C. A.; Ruano, Rodrigo; Herndon, C. D.

In: Journal of Pediatric Urology, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.08.2017, p. 345-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0df2bb28c0ee4a52972ba47c8c98fda1,
title = "Report on The Society for Fetal Urology panel discussion on the selection criteria and intervention for fetal bladder outlet obstruction",
abstract = "Introduction The Society for Fetal Urology panel section at the 2016 Fall Congress featured a multidisciplinary discussion on appropriate patient selection, the conservative versus surgical management, and postnatal renal outcome of fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO). Selection criteria for intervention Rodrigo Ruano shared his experience of prenatal intervention, presenting the outcome of 111 fetuses with severe LUTO treated with vesicoamniotic shunting (VAS) (n = 16), cystoscopy (n = 34) or no intervention (n = 61) in a non-randomized series. Multivariate analysis at the 6-month follow-up suggested a significantly higher probability of survival with fetal intervention versus no intervention. A clear trend for normal renal function was present in the fetal cystoscopy group, but not in the VAS group. In cases in which there was a postnatal diagnosis of posterior urethral valves (n = 57), fetal cystoscopy was effective in improving both the 6-month survival rate and renal function, while VAS was associated with an improvement in the 6-month survival rate. In an attempt to better define which fetuses would benefit from intervention, Michael Braun explained the proposed LUTO classification system that incorporates: (1) fetal urinary biomarkers of renal injury; (2) amniotic fluid levels as a surrogate for the severity of obstruction; and (3) imaging studies to identify signs of renal dysplastic or cystic changes. Intervention was not recommended in patients at low risk of either renal disease or pulmonary hypoplasia (Stage 1). Vesicoamniotic shunting was performed in patients at high risk of either progressive renal injury or pulmonary hypoplasia without evidence of severe pre-existing renal damage (Stage 2). For those patients, who at the time of evaluation had evidence of severe renal disease (Stage 3), fetal intervention was individualized and often based on bladder capacity and bladder refilling after vesicocentesis. He went on to present the nephrologic outcome of fetuses managed over the last 3 years utilizing the selection criteria. Craig Peters supported the concept of selective criteria and discussed the cautious viewpoint, namely: (1) the procedure may be unnecessary, as it is possible for patients to do well, in spite of severe prenatal obstruction; and (2) the risk of giving partial treatment by allowing the baby to survive to delivery with the daunting postnatal journey of renal and pulmonary insufficiency. Conclusion Standardized patient selection utilizing a staging system is undoubtedly the way forward and will enable comparable long-term renal and bladder functional outcome studies.",
keywords = "Congenital bladder outlet obstruction, Fetal cystoscopy, Fetal intervention, Lower urinary tract obstruction, Posterior urethral valves, Vesicoamniotic shunting",
author = "Farrugia, {M. K.} and Braun, {M. C.} and Peters, {C. A.} and Rodrigo Ruano and Herndon, {C. D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.02.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "345--351",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Urology",
issn = "1477-5131",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Report on The Society for Fetal Urology panel discussion on the selection criteria and intervention for fetal bladder outlet obstruction

AU - Farrugia, M. K.

AU - Braun, M. C.

AU - Peters, C. A.

AU - Ruano, Rodrigo

AU - Herndon, C. D.

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Introduction The Society for Fetal Urology panel section at the 2016 Fall Congress featured a multidisciplinary discussion on appropriate patient selection, the conservative versus surgical management, and postnatal renal outcome of fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO). Selection criteria for intervention Rodrigo Ruano shared his experience of prenatal intervention, presenting the outcome of 111 fetuses with severe LUTO treated with vesicoamniotic shunting (VAS) (n = 16), cystoscopy (n = 34) or no intervention (n = 61) in a non-randomized series. Multivariate analysis at the 6-month follow-up suggested a significantly higher probability of survival with fetal intervention versus no intervention. A clear trend for normal renal function was present in the fetal cystoscopy group, but not in the VAS group. In cases in which there was a postnatal diagnosis of posterior urethral valves (n = 57), fetal cystoscopy was effective in improving both the 6-month survival rate and renal function, while VAS was associated with an improvement in the 6-month survival rate. In an attempt to better define which fetuses would benefit from intervention, Michael Braun explained the proposed LUTO classification system that incorporates: (1) fetal urinary biomarkers of renal injury; (2) amniotic fluid levels as a surrogate for the severity of obstruction; and (3) imaging studies to identify signs of renal dysplastic or cystic changes. Intervention was not recommended in patients at low risk of either renal disease or pulmonary hypoplasia (Stage 1). Vesicoamniotic shunting was performed in patients at high risk of either progressive renal injury or pulmonary hypoplasia without evidence of severe pre-existing renal damage (Stage 2). For those patients, who at the time of evaluation had evidence of severe renal disease (Stage 3), fetal intervention was individualized and often based on bladder capacity and bladder refilling after vesicocentesis. He went on to present the nephrologic outcome of fetuses managed over the last 3 years utilizing the selection criteria. Craig Peters supported the concept of selective criteria and discussed the cautious viewpoint, namely: (1) the procedure may be unnecessary, as it is possible for patients to do well, in spite of severe prenatal obstruction; and (2) the risk of giving partial treatment by allowing the baby to survive to delivery with the daunting postnatal journey of renal and pulmonary insufficiency. Conclusion Standardized patient selection utilizing a staging system is undoubtedly the way forward and will enable comparable long-term renal and bladder functional outcome studies.

AB - Introduction The Society for Fetal Urology panel section at the 2016 Fall Congress featured a multidisciplinary discussion on appropriate patient selection, the conservative versus surgical management, and postnatal renal outcome of fetuses with lower urinary tract obstruction (LUTO). Selection criteria for intervention Rodrigo Ruano shared his experience of prenatal intervention, presenting the outcome of 111 fetuses with severe LUTO treated with vesicoamniotic shunting (VAS) (n = 16), cystoscopy (n = 34) or no intervention (n = 61) in a non-randomized series. Multivariate analysis at the 6-month follow-up suggested a significantly higher probability of survival with fetal intervention versus no intervention. A clear trend for normal renal function was present in the fetal cystoscopy group, but not in the VAS group. In cases in which there was a postnatal diagnosis of posterior urethral valves (n = 57), fetal cystoscopy was effective in improving both the 6-month survival rate and renal function, while VAS was associated with an improvement in the 6-month survival rate. In an attempt to better define which fetuses would benefit from intervention, Michael Braun explained the proposed LUTO classification system that incorporates: (1) fetal urinary biomarkers of renal injury; (2) amniotic fluid levels as a surrogate for the severity of obstruction; and (3) imaging studies to identify signs of renal dysplastic or cystic changes. Intervention was not recommended in patients at low risk of either renal disease or pulmonary hypoplasia (Stage 1). Vesicoamniotic shunting was performed in patients at high risk of either progressive renal injury or pulmonary hypoplasia without evidence of severe pre-existing renal damage (Stage 2). For those patients, who at the time of evaluation had evidence of severe renal disease (Stage 3), fetal intervention was individualized and often based on bladder capacity and bladder refilling after vesicocentesis. He went on to present the nephrologic outcome of fetuses managed over the last 3 years utilizing the selection criteria. Craig Peters supported the concept of selective criteria and discussed the cautious viewpoint, namely: (1) the procedure may be unnecessary, as it is possible for patients to do well, in spite of severe prenatal obstruction; and (2) the risk of giving partial treatment by allowing the baby to survive to delivery with the daunting postnatal journey of renal and pulmonary insufficiency. Conclusion Standardized patient selection utilizing a staging system is undoubtedly the way forward and will enable comparable long-term renal and bladder functional outcome studies.

KW - Congenital bladder outlet obstruction

KW - Fetal cystoscopy

KW - Fetal intervention

KW - Lower urinary tract obstruction

KW - Posterior urethral valves

KW - Vesicoamniotic shunting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018995099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018995099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.02.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.02.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 28476482

AN - SCOPUS:85018995099

VL - 13

SP - 345

EP - 351

JO - Journal of Pediatric Urology

JF - Journal of Pediatric Urology

SN - 1477-5131

IS - 4

ER -