TY - JOUR
T1 - Report of an international workshop to standardize baseline evaluation and response criteria for primary CNS lymphoma
AU - Abrey, Lauren E.
AU - Batchelor, Tracy T.
AU - Ferreri, Andrés J.M.
AU - Gospodarowicz, Mary
AU - Pulczynski, Elisa J.
AU - Zucca, Emanuele
AU - Smith, Justine R.
AU - Korfel, Agnieszka
AU - Soussain, Carole
AU - DeAngelis, Lisa M.
AU - Neuwelt, Edward A.
AU - O'Neill, Brian Patrick
AU - Thiel, Eckhard
AU - Shenkier, Tamara
AU - Graus, Fransesc
AU - van den Bent, Martin
AU - Seymour, John F.
AU - Poortmans, Philip
AU - Armitage, James O.
AU - Cavalli, Franco
PY - 2005/12/1
Y1 - 2005/12/1
N2 - Standardized guidelines for the baseline evaluation and response assessment of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) are critical to ensure comparability among clinical trials for newly diagnosed patients. The relative rarity of this tumor precludes rapid completion of large-scale phase III trials and, therefore, our reliance on the results of well-designed phase II trials is critical. To formulate this recommendation, an international group of experts representing hematologic oncology, medical oncology, neuro-oncology, neurology, radiation oncology, neurosurgery, and ophthalmology met to review current standards of reporting and to formulate a consensus opinion regarding minimum baseline evaluation and common standards for assessing response to therapy. The response guidelines were based on the results of neuroimaging, corticosteroid use, ophthalmologic examination, and CSF cytology. A critical issue that requires additional study is the optimal method to assess the neurocognitive impact of therapy and address the quality of life of PCNSL survivors. We hope that these guidelines will improve communication among investigators and comparability among clinical trials in a way that will allow us to develop better therapies for patients.
AB - Standardized guidelines for the baseline evaluation and response assessment of primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) are critical to ensure comparability among clinical trials for newly diagnosed patients. The relative rarity of this tumor precludes rapid completion of large-scale phase III trials and, therefore, our reliance on the results of well-designed phase II trials is critical. To formulate this recommendation, an international group of experts representing hematologic oncology, medical oncology, neuro-oncology, neurology, radiation oncology, neurosurgery, and ophthalmology met to review current standards of reporting and to formulate a consensus opinion regarding minimum baseline evaluation and common standards for assessing response to therapy. The response guidelines were based on the results of neuroimaging, corticosteroid use, ophthalmologic examination, and CSF cytology. A critical issue that requires additional study is the optimal method to assess the neurocognitive impact of therapy and address the quality of life of PCNSL survivors. We hope that these guidelines will improve communication among investigators and comparability among clinical trials in a way that will allow us to develop better therapies for patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24644432553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24644432553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2005.13.524
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2005.13.524
M3 - Review article
C2 - 15955902
AN - SCOPUS:24644432553
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 23
SP - 5034
EP - 5043
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 22
ER -