Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in the neurocritically ill patient

Murat Yilmaz, Levent Dosemeci, Melike Cengiz, Suat Sanli, Ognjen Gajic, Atilla Ramazanoglu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous tracheostomy is a widely used and accepted method for long-term mechanical ventilation and airway protection. Neurocritically ill patients sometimes require repeat tracheostomy, which is traditionally considered a relative contraindication for percutaneous procedure. The aim of this study was to determine the safety of repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in neurocritically ill patients with a history of previous tracheostomy. Methods: In the 16-bed academic neurointensive care unit, we prospectively enrolled patients who needed new tracheostomy placement for airway protection or prolonged mechanical ventilation and had previously undergone percutaneous tracheostomy placement. We collected data on indications, procedure, periprocedural complications, and outcome of repeated tracheostomy. Results: Between January 2001 and October 2005, we enrolled 12 consecutive patients (mean age 35.4 ± 7.0 years) who underwent repeat percutaneous tracheostomy. Head injury was the most common underlying diagnosis (seven patients, 58%). Tracheostomy tube placement was easy and successful in all patients, and none of the patients needed conversion to surgical tracheostomy. In three patients, ultrasound-guided needle aspiration was used before the procedure to confirm the position of the trachea. No patients died or experienced serious complication related to the procedure. Two patients (17%) had a minor periprocedural bleeding, which was controlled with local compression. Long-term outcome was poor, with only two patients alive and off the ventilator at hospital discharge, both with serious disability. Conclusion: Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy can be performed safely in neurocritically ill patients who have undergone previous tracheostomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)120-123
Number of pages4
JournalNeurocritical Care
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

Tracheostomy
Artificial Respiration
Mechanical Ventilators
Trachea
Craniocerebral Trauma
Needles
Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Neurointensive care
  • Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in the neurocritically ill patient. / Yilmaz, Murat; Dosemeci, Levent; Cengiz, Melike; Sanli, Suat; Gajic, Ognjen; Ramazanoglu, Atilla.

In: Neurocritical Care, Vol. 5, No. 2, 10.2006, p. 120-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yilmaz, M, Dosemeci, L, Cengiz, M, Sanli, S, Gajic, O & Ramazanoglu, A 2006, 'Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in the neurocritically ill patient', Neurocritical Care, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 120-123. https://doi.org/10.1385/Neurocrit. Care 2006;05:120-123
Yilmaz, Murat ; Dosemeci, Levent ; Cengiz, Melike ; Sanli, Suat ; Gajic, Ognjen ; Ramazanoglu, Atilla. / Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in the neurocritically ill patient. In: Neurocritical Care. 2006 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 120-123.
@article{b4075a1274134c42a28b28cbcd88f795,
title = "Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in the neurocritically ill patient",
abstract = "Introduction: Percutaneous tracheostomy is a widely used and accepted method for long-term mechanical ventilation and airway protection. Neurocritically ill patients sometimes require repeat tracheostomy, which is traditionally considered a relative contraindication for percutaneous procedure. The aim of this study was to determine the safety of repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in neurocritically ill patients with a history of previous tracheostomy. Methods: In the 16-bed academic neurointensive care unit, we prospectively enrolled patients who needed new tracheostomy placement for airway protection or prolonged mechanical ventilation and had previously undergone percutaneous tracheostomy placement. We collected data on indications, procedure, periprocedural complications, and outcome of repeated tracheostomy. Results: Between January 2001 and October 2005, we enrolled 12 consecutive patients (mean age 35.4 ± 7.0 years) who underwent repeat percutaneous tracheostomy. Head injury was the most common underlying diagnosis (seven patients, 58{\%}). Tracheostomy tube placement was easy and successful in all patients, and none of the patients needed conversion to surgical tracheostomy. In three patients, ultrasound-guided needle aspiration was used before the procedure to confirm the position of the trachea. No patients died or experienced serious complication related to the procedure. Two patients (17{\%}) had a minor periprocedural bleeding, which was controlled with local compression. Long-term outcome was poor, with only two patients alive and off the ventilator at hospital discharge, both with serious disability. Conclusion: Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy can be performed safely in neurocritically ill patients who have undergone previous tracheostomy.",
keywords = "Neurointensive care, Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy",
author = "Murat Yilmaz and Levent Dosemeci and Melike Cengiz and Suat Sanli and Ognjen Gajic and Atilla Ramazanoglu",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1385/Neurocrit. Care 2006;05:120-123",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "120--123",
journal = "Neurocritical Care",
issn = "1541-6933",
publisher = "Humana Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in the neurocritically ill patient

AU - Yilmaz, Murat

AU - Dosemeci, Levent

AU - Cengiz, Melike

AU - Sanli, Suat

AU - Gajic, Ognjen

AU - Ramazanoglu, Atilla

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - Introduction: Percutaneous tracheostomy is a widely used and accepted method for long-term mechanical ventilation and airway protection. Neurocritically ill patients sometimes require repeat tracheostomy, which is traditionally considered a relative contraindication for percutaneous procedure. The aim of this study was to determine the safety of repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in neurocritically ill patients with a history of previous tracheostomy. Methods: In the 16-bed academic neurointensive care unit, we prospectively enrolled patients who needed new tracheostomy placement for airway protection or prolonged mechanical ventilation and had previously undergone percutaneous tracheostomy placement. We collected data on indications, procedure, periprocedural complications, and outcome of repeated tracheostomy. Results: Between January 2001 and October 2005, we enrolled 12 consecutive patients (mean age 35.4 ± 7.0 years) who underwent repeat percutaneous tracheostomy. Head injury was the most common underlying diagnosis (seven patients, 58%). Tracheostomy tube placement was easy and successful in all patients, and none of the patients needed conversion to surgical tracheostomy. In three patients, ultrasound-guided needle aspiration was used before the procedure to confirm the position of the trachea. No patients died or experienced serious complication related to the procedure. Two patients (17%) had a minor periprocedural bleeding, which was controlled with local compression. Long-term outcome was poor, with only two patients alive and off the ventilator at hospital discharge, both with serious disability. Conclusion: Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy can be performed safely in neurocritically ill patients who have undergone previous tracheostomy.

AB - Introduction: Percutaneous tracheostomy is a widely used and accepted method for long-term mechanical ventilation and airway protection. Neurocritically ill patients sometimes require repeat tracheostomy, which is traditionally considered a relative contraindication for percutaneous procedure. The aim of this study was to determine the safety of repeat percutaneous tracheostomy in neurocritically ill patients with a history of previous tracheostomy. Methods: In the 16-bed academic neurointensive care unit, we prospectively enrolled patients who needed new tracheostomy placement for airway protection or prolonged mechanical ventilation and had previously undergone percutaneous tracheostomy placement. We collected data on indications, procedure, periprocedural complications, and outcome of repeated tracheostomy. Results: Between January 2001 and October 2005, we enrolled 12 consecutive patients (mean age 35.4 ± 7.0 years) who underwent repeat percutaneous tracheostomy. Head injury was the most common underlying diagnosis (seven patients, 58%). Tracheostomy tube placement was easy and successful in all patients, and none of the patients needed conversion to surgical tracheostomy. In three patients, ultrasound-guided needle aspiration was used before the procedure to confirm the position of the trachea. No patients died or experienced serious complication related to the procedure. Two patients (17%) had a minor periprocedural bleeding, which was controlled with local compression. Long-term outcome was poor, with only two patients alive and off the ventilator at hospital discharge, both with serious disability. Conclusion: Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy can be performed safely in neurocritically ill patients who have undergone previous tracheostomy.

KW - Neurointensive care

KW - Repeat percutaneous tracheostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750897775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750897775&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1385/Neurocrit. Care 2006;05:120-123

DO - 10.1385/Neurocrit. Care 2006;05:120-123

M3 - Article

C2 - 17099258

AN - SCOPUS:33750897775

VL - 5

SP - 120

EP - 123

JO - Neurocritical Care

JF - Neurocritical Care

SN - 1541-6933

IS - 2

ER -