Renal transplants: Can acute rejection and acute tubular necrosis be differentiated with MR imaging?

Johnson T.S. Liou, Joseph K.T. Lee, Jay P. Heiken, William G. Totty, Paul L. Molina, Wayne M. Flye

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was used in 40 renal transplant recipients to determine whether this modality can enable distinction of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and acute rejection by means of corticomedullary differentiation (CMD). Each patient underwent initial MR imaging after allograft renal transplantation. Twenty-nine of these 40 patients (72%) also underwent subsequent follow-up MR imaging. Seventeen studies were obtained during episodes of ATN; 12 of these studies (71%) showed poor CMD. Eleven studies were obtained during episodes of acute rejection; eight of these studies (73%) showed poor CMD. In addition, six of seven studies (86%) showing various combinations of renal disease (ATN, acute rejection, chronic rejection, and cyclosporine toxicity) also showed poor CMD. Loss of CMD is reversible after improvement of ATN and acute rejection. Because loss of CMD is a nonspecific though sensitive sign reflecting renal transplant dysfunction, MR imaging is of limited value in the differentiation of ATN from acute rejection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-65
Number of pages5
JournalRadiology
Volume179
Issue number1
StatePublished - Apr 1991

Keywords

  • Kidney, MR studies, 81.1214
  • Kidney, necrosis, 81.4553
  • Kidney, transplantation, 81.4552

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Renal transplants: Can acute rejection and acute tubular necrosis be differentiated with MR imaging?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this