Relationship between muscle stress and intramuscular pressure during dynamic muscle contractions

Samuel R. Ward, Jennifer Davis, Kenton R Kaufman, Richard L. Lieber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intramuscular pressure (IMP) has been used to estimate muscle stress indirectly. However, the ability of this technique to estimate muscle stress under dynamic conditions is poorly characterized. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which IMP is a valid surrogate for muscle stress during dynamic contractions. IMP and muscle stress were compared under steady-state isotonic conditions and during complex dynamic length changes. During concentric contractions the shape of the IMP-velocity curve mimicked the basic shape of the force-velocity curve but with much higher variability. For eccentric contractions, a precipitous drop in IMP was observed despite increased muscle stress. The dissociation between muscle stress and IMP during dynamic contractions was partially explained by sensor movement. When the muscle was not moving, IMP explained 89% ± 5% of the variance in muscle force. However, when transducer movement occurred the linear relationship between IMP and stress was no longer observed. These findings demonstrate the difficulty in interpreting IMP under dynamic conditions when sensor movement occurs. They also illustrate the need to control transducer movement if muscle stress is to be inferred from IMP measurements such as might be desired during clinical gait testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)313-319
Number of pages7
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Muscle Contraction
Pressure
Muscles
Transducers
Gait

Keywords

  • Fluid mechanics
  • Force-velocity relationship
  • Interstitial fluid pressure
  • Intramuscular pressure
  • Isotonic contraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Relationship between muscle stress and intramuscular pressure during dynamic muscle contractions. / Ward, Samuel R.; Davis, Jennifer; Kaufman, Kenton R; Lieber, Richard L.

In: Muscle and Nerve, Vol. 36, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 313-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ward, Samuel R. ; Davis, Jennifer ; Kaufman, Kenton R ; Lieber, Richard L. / Relationship between muscle stress and intramuscular pressure during dynamic muscle contractions. In: Muscle and Nerve. 2007 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 313-319.
@article{0d80e401acbf4ed1ba59c168042e31b6,
title = "Relationship between muscle stress and intramuscular pressure during dynamic muscle contractions",
abstract = "Intramuscular pressure (IMP) has been used to estimate muscle stress indirectly. However, the ability of this technique to estimate muscle stress under dynamic conditions is poorly characterized. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which IMP is a valid surrogate for muscle stress during dynamic contractions. IMP and muscle stress were compared under steady-state isotonic conditions and during complex dynamic length changes. During concentric contractions the shape of the IMP-velocity curve mimicked the basic shape of the force-velocity curve but with much higher variability. For eccentric contractions, a precipitous drop in IMP was observed despite increased muscle stress. The dissociation between muscle stress and IMP during dynamic contractions was partially explained by sensor movement. When the muscle was not moving, IMP explained 89{\%} ± 5{\%} of the variance in muscle force. However, when transducer movement occurred the linear relationship between IMP and stress was no longer observed. These findings demonstrate the difficulty in interpreting IMP under dynamic conditions when sensor movement occurs. They also illustrate the need to control transducer movement if muscle stress is to be inferred from IMP measurements such as might be desired during clinical gait testing.",
keywords = "Fluid mechanics, Force-velocity relationship, Interstitial fluid pressure, Intramuscular pressure, Isotonic contraction",
author = "Ward, {Samuel R.} and Jennifer Davis and Kaufman, {Kenton R} and Lieber, {Richard L.}",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/mus.20828",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "313--319",
journal = "Muscle and Nerve",
issn = "0148-639X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between muscle stress and intramuscular pressure during dynamic muscle contractions

AU - Ward, Samuel R.

AU - Davis, Jennifer

AU - Kaufman, Kenton R

AU - Lieber, Richard L.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Intramuscular pressure (IMP) has been used to estimate muscle stress indirectly. However, the ability of this technique to estimate muscle stress under dynamic conditions is poorly characterized. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which IMP is a valid surrogate for muscle stress during dynamic contractions. IMP and muscle stress were compared under steady-state isotonic conditions and during complex dynamic length changes. During concentric contractions the shape of the IMP-velocity curve mimicked the basic shape of the force-velocity curve but with much higher variability. For eccentric contractions, a precipitous drop in IMP was observed despite increased muscle stress. The dissociation between muscle stress and IMP during dynamic contractions was partially explained by sensor movement. When the muscle was not moving, IMP explained 89% ± 5% of the variance in muscle force. However, when transducer movement occurred the linear relationship between IMP and stress was no longer observed. These findings demonstrate the difficulty in interpreting IMP under dynamic conditions when sensor movement occurs. They also illustrate the need to control transducer movement if muscle stress is to be inferred from IMP measurements such as might be desired during clinical gait testing.

AB - Intramuscular pressure (IMP) has been used to estimate muscle stress indirectly. However, the ability of this technique to estimate muscle stress under dynamic conditions is poorly characterized. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which IMP is a valid surrogate for muscle stress during dynamic contractions. IMP and muscle stress were compared under steady-state isotonic conditions and during complex dynamic length changes. During concentric contractions the shape of the IMP-velocity curve mimicked the basic shape of the force-velocity curve but with much higher variability. For eccentric contractions, a precipitous drop in IMP was observed despite increased muscle stress. The dissociation between muscle stress and IMP during dynamic contractions was partially explained by sensor movement. When the muscle was not moving, IMP explained 89% ± 5% of the variance in muscle force. However, when transducer movement occurred the linear relationship between IMP and stress was no longer observed. These findings demonstrate the difficulty in interpreting IMP under dynamic conditions when sensor movement occurs. They also illustrate the need to control transducer movement if muscle stress is to be inferred from IMP measurements such as might be desired during clinical gait testing.

KW - Fluid mechanics

KW - Force-velocity relationship

KW - Interstitial fluid pressure

KW - Intramuscular pressure

KW - Isotonic contraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548246084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548246084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mus.20828

DO - 10.1002/mus.20828

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 313

EP - 319

JO - Muscle and Nerve

JF - Muscle and Nerve

SN - 0148-639X

IS - 3

ER -